ETF Comparison

PSI vs SOXX: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco Semiconductors ETF and iShares Semiconductor ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
Metric	PSI	SOXX
Full name	Invesco Semiconductors ETF	iShares Semiconductor ETF
Issuer	Invesco	iShares
Last Close	$150.97 as of August 13, 2026	$546.61 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield	0.04%	0.21%
Distribution Safety Score™	33	80
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.35%
AUM	$2.50B	$47.6B
Distribution frequency	Quarterly	Quarterly
Underlying index	—	ICE Semiconductor Index
Objective	—	Tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index of US-listed semiconductor companies.
Asset class	Equity	Equity
Inception date	06/23/2005	07/10/2001
Beta	2.36	2.32
Last dividend	$0.0160	$0.2830
Ex-dividend date	06/22/2026	06/15/2026

Bottom linePSI and SOXX are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar technology exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: SOXX is cheaper at 0.35% vs 0.57%.

Model this comparison:

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Invesco

ETFs248

Total AUM$976B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major ETF provider known for offering a comprehensive lineup spanning multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company specializes in income-focused products including dividend, covered call, and bond strategies, while also maintaining broad exposure across equity, factor-based, thematic, and ESG investing themes. Invesco's portfolio ranges from index-tracking funds to alternatives and specialized offerings like digital assets and BulletShares, making it one of the more expansive ETF families available to investors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on PSI.

See all Invesco ETFs

iShares

ETFs469

Total AUM$4661B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SOXX.

See all iShares ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

PSI has outpaced SOXX over the trailing twelve months, posting a 151.04% total return against 126.54%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — SOXX has compounded at 32.88% a year, ahead of PSI at 31.56%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
Symbol	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y	10Y	Since Jun 2005	Volatility	Sharpe	Sortino	Max drawdown
PSI	82.20%	151.04%	50.32%	28.90%	31.56%	18.01%	43.0%	0.85	1.19	-41.1%
SOXX	74.44%	126.54%	49.59%	30.12%	32.88%	18.59%	39.3%	0.91	1.30	-41.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2005” measures every fund from June 23, 2005 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SOXX offers the higher yield at 0.21% vs 0.04% for PSI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SOXX is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.57%.

SOXX is the larger fund by assets ($47.6B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Still deciding? Track PSI & SOXX for free

Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.

Add to my watchlist See what a free account includes

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, PSI would generate roughly $0.33/month, while SOXX would produce $1.75/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

PSI yield0.04%

SOXX yield0.21%

Monthly diff on $10K$1.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, PSI would cost approximately $570 in fees vs $350 for SOXX (simplified, not compounded). The $220.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

PSI ER0.57%

SOXX ER0.35%

Strategy & risk

PSI is an ETF, while SOXX tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. Beta is 2.36 for PSI and 2.32 for SOXX, indicating SOXX is less volatile relative to the market.

PSI beta2.36

SOXX beta2.32

Fund details

PSI is managed by Invesco (launched 06/23/2005) with $2.50B in assets. SOXX is managed by iShares (launched 07/10/2001) with $47.6B in assets.

PSI AUM$2.50B

SOXX AUM$47.6B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for PSI and SOXX?

PSI currently distributes 0.04% and SOXX 0.21%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is PSI or SOXX better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SOXX currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between PSI and SOXX?

PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) is an ETF, while SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They are issued by Invesco and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both PSI and SOXX?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is PSI or SOXX safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SOXX scores 80, PSI scores 33, so SOXX's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, PSI or SOXX?

PSI has an expense ratio of 0.57% while SOXX charges 0.35%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in PSI vs SOXX generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in PSI would generate roughly $0.33 per month ($4.00 annually). The same in SOXX would produce about $1.75 per month ($21.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, PSI or SOXX?

More comparisons to explore

People also compare PSI with

People also compare SOXX with

Popular comparisons

PSI vs SOXX — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

PSI and SOXX are both semiconductor-focused equity ETFs tracking US-listed chip companies, but they differ in size, cost, and underlying methodology. SOXX tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index as a passive fund, while PSI's strategy and index are not specified in available data. SOXX is substantially larger ($47.6B vs. $2.50B AUM) and charges a lower expense ratio, making it the dominant fund in the category.

How they differ

The biggest distinction is scale and index methodology: SOXX holds $47.6B in assets and explicitly tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index, whereas PSI's $2.50B AUM and underlying approach are not detailed. Cost matters here — SOXX's 0.35% expense ratio beats PSI's 0.57%, a 22 basis-point gap that compounds over decades. Both funds are volatile (beta of 2.26 for PSI, 2.24 for SOXX), but PSI pays out almost nothing (0.04% distribution rate) compared to SOXX's 0.21%, suggesting PSI tilts toward capital appreciation or holds lower-yielding names.

Who each is best for

PSI: Fits investors seeking pure semiconductor-sector exposure with minimal current income, emphasizing long-term capital growth in a high-beta technology pocket.

SOXX: Designed for investors wanting broad, transparent semiconductor-index exposure with the cost efficiency and liquidity that come with a significantly larger, passive fund structure.

Key risks to know

Semiconductor-sector concentration. Both funds are entirely exposed to chip companies, which face cyclical demand swings, geopolitical supply-chain disruption (particularly Taiwan exposure), and rapid technological obsolescence. A sector-wide downturn would affect both simultaneously.

High beta and volatility. Both funds carry beta near 2.24–2.26, meaning they tend to fall roughly twice as fast as the broad market during downturns. Investors uncomfortable with 40%+ drawdowns in severe bear markets should size accordingly.

PSI's strategy opacity. The underlying index and weighting methodology for PSI are not specified in available data, making it difficult to assess whether it tracks the same universe as SOXX or applies a different tilt. This opacity could mask hidden tracking error or sector tilts.

SOXX's concentration risk in mega-cap names. At $47.6B AUM tracking a semiconductor index, SOXX likely holds significant positions in the largest chip firms (NVIDIA, Intel, Broadcom, etc.), amplifying exposure to individual company earnings shocks and valuation swings in the sector's heavyweights.

Bottom line

SOXX offers a cheaper, larger, and more transparent path to semiconductor exposure if you want a passive index approach; PSI might appeal to investors willing to trade higher fees and opacity for a potentially different strategy, though that strategy isn't documented here. Both are volatile bets on the chip cycle — suitable only for investors with high risk tolerance and a long time horizon. Past performance in semiconductors doesn't predict future returns, especially given rapid product cycles and geopolitical risk.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener