DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QDTE vs QDTY: Nasdaq 0DTE Income Compared

QDTE and QDTY both pair Nasdaq-100 exposure with calls that expire on the day they are sold. Roundhill and YieldMax manage separate implementations; a shared index and a weekly payout goal do not make the return paths identical.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • QDTEInvestors who want Roundhill's same-day call implementation and accept equity losses.
  • QDTYInvestors who want YieldMax's same-day call implementation and accept equity losses.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested ยท ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

QDTE has outpaced QDTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 22.67% total return against 20.40%. Measured from Feb 2025 โ€” the start of shared available history โ€” QDTE has compounded at 19.21% a year versus 16.36% for QDTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Feb 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QDTE17.67%22.67%19.21%18.3%0.871.21-10.2%
QDTY15.00%20.40%16.36%18.8%0.751.06-11.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. โ€œSince Feb 2025โ€ measures every fund from February 13, 2025 โ€” the start of shared available history โ€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) โ€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window โ€” shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricQDTEQDTY
Forward distribution rate19.75%28.72%
Trailing 12-month yield44.08%36.60%
30-day SEC yieldโ€”-0.94%
Return of capital100.00%100.00%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on QDTE vs QQQ, QDTY vs QQQ.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricQDTEQDTY
Full nameRoundhill Nasdaq-100ยฎ 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETFYieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
IssuerRoundhill InvestmentsYieldMax
Last Close$29.21 as of September 30, 2026$38.91 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate19.75%28.72%
Trailing 12-month yield44.08%36.60%
30-day SEC yieldโ€”-0.94%
Distribution Safety Scoreโ„ข 7475
Safety-Adjusted Yield 14.62%21.54%
Expense ratio0.96%1.17%
AUM$983M$27.4M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Underlying indexNasdaq-100Nasdaq-100
ObjectiveSeeks weekly income by investing at least 80% of net assets in instruments that provide exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index and writing zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) call options against that exposure.Seeks weekly income through a synthetic covered call strategy that provides exposure to the price return of the Nasdaq-100 Index while selling call options on the index or on ETFs that track it.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/07/202402/12/2025
Beta1.19031.146
Last dividend$0.110957 declared, pays 10/02/2026$0.2149 declared, pays 10/01/2026
Ex-dividend date10/01/2026 upcoming09/30/2026

Bottom lineChoose QDTE if you want Roundhill's same-day call implementation and accept equity losses. Choose QDTY if you want YieldMax's same-day call implementation and accept equity losses. No. Cash paid can coincide with a falling NAV. Compare total return over the same available dates, then examine distribution variability, expenses and option positioning. A 0DTE call expires quickly, but it does not remove the underlying equity exposure or guarantee that premiums offset a market decline.

QDTE vs QDTY: Nasdaq 0DTE Income Compared

QDTE and QDTY both pair Nasdaq-100 exposure with calls that expire on the day they are sold. Roundhill and YieldMax manage separate implementations; a shared index and a weekly payout goal do not make the return paths identical.

QDTEQDTY
ApproachRoundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE strategyYieldMax Nasdaq-100 0DTE strategy
Risk reviewIndex declines and intraday option pathIndex declines and intraday option path
Expense ratio0.96%1.17%
Portfolio fitReview combined holdings and weightsReview combined holdings and weights

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. QDTE and QDTY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time โ€” the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs56
Total AUM$39.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks โ€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QDTE.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks โ€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QDTY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years โ€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

QDTE and QDTY both pair Nasdaq-100 exposure with calls that expire on the day they are sold. Roundhill and YieldMax manage separate implementations; a shared index and a weekly payout goal do not make the return paths identical.

No. Cash paid can coincide with a falling NAV. Compare total return over the same available dates, then examine distribution variability, expenses and option positioning. A 0DTE call expires quickly, but it does not remove the underlying equity exposure or guarantee that premiums offset a market decline.

Deep dive

Use a common observation window

Start at the later fund's available history and use the same end date. Comparing each fund since its own inception mixes different market conditions. A short shared history cannot establish performance across a full market cycle.

Continue the comparison

QDTY vs QQQ ยท QDTE vs QQQI

Strategy sources checked September 27, 2026: QDTE issuer material ยท QDTY issuer material.

Current metrics use the dated snapshot above. Distributions can vary and may include return of capital; a distribution rate is not an expected total return.

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor โ€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Does the higher weekly payout make QDTE or QDTY the better performer?

No. Cash paid can coincide with a falling NAV. Compare total return over the same available dates, then examine distribution variability, expenses and option positioning. A 0DTE call expires quickly, but it does not remove the underlying equity exposure or guarantee that premiums offset a market decline.

How should I compare risk and ownership costs?

Use matching dates and definitions for returns, distributions, and fees. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection. Check current bid-ask spreads and premiums or discounts; AUM alone does not determine the price available for your order.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings โ€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.