DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QDVO vs SPYI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • QDVOInvestors who want a covered-call overwrite written on the holdings themselves.
  • SPYIInvestors who want index call spreads structured for Section 1256 tax treatment.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

QDVO has lagged SPYI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.84% total return against 14.93%. Measured from Aug 2024 — the start of shared available history — QDVO has compounded at 20.76% a year versus 15.78% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Aug 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QDVO10.58%13.84%20.76%13.3%0.630.92-10.2%
SPYI10.68%14.93%15.78%10.8%0.871.24-7.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Aug 2024” measures every fund from August 22, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate and SEC yield

MetricQDVOSPYI
Forward distribution rate11.18%12.05%
Trailing 12-month yield10.53%11.93%
30-day SEC yield—0.46%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on SPYI vs SPY.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricQDVOSPYI
Full nameAmplify CWP Growth & Income ETFNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerAmplify ETFsNEOS
Underlying indexU.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlayS&P 500 Index
Last Close$29.90 as of September 30, 2026$53.17 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate11.18%12.05%
Trailing 12-month yield10.53%11.93%
30-day SEC yield—0.46%
Distribution Safety Score™ 8490
Safety-Adjusted Yield 9.39%10.85%
Expense ratio0.56%0.68%
AUM$779M$12.4B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
ObjectiveSeeks to provide high monthly income with the potential for capital appreciation by investing in quality U.S. dividend-paying equities and writing covered call options on those holdings.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date08/21/202408/29/2022
Beta0.93380.7
Last dividend$0.27866 payable today$0.5338
Ex-dividend date09/29/202609/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose QDVO if you want a covered-call overwrite written on the holdings themselves. Choose SPYI if you want index call spreads structured for Section 1256 tax treatment. QDVO and SPYI both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. QDVO and SPYI generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs46
Total AUM$16.8B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Amplify ETFs is known for offering specialized, thematic investment solutions across diverse market segments including digital assets, commodities, and dividend strategies. The issuer's lineup spans multiple fund families covering income-focused strategies, covered call approaches, commodity exposure, and thematic sectors such as cybersecurity, blockchain, gaming, and sustainable investing. Notable for tickers like BLOK (blockchain), HACK (cybersecurity), and DIVO (dividend), Amplify combines traditional income strategies with alternative themes and emerging asset classes, appealing to investors seeking both yield and exposure to innovation-driven sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QDVO.

ETFs19
Total AUM$34.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 12.05% vs 11.18% for QDVO. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QDVO is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.56% compared to 0.68%.

They have different reference exposures: QDVO is linked to U.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlay while SPYI is linked to S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPYI is the larger fund by assets ($12.4B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose QDVO

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

  • Want a covered-call overwrite on the stocks the fund holds.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.56% expense ratio vs 0.68% for SPYI.

Choose SPYI

NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF

  • Want index call spreads structured for Section 1256 tax treatment.
  • Want to maximize current income — SPYI distributes roughly 12.05% from selling options premium, vs 11.18% for QDVO.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.7 vs 0.9 for QDVO.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QDVO would generate roughly $93.17 cash per distribution, while SPYI would produce $100.42 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

QDVO yield11.18%
SPYI yield12.05%
Cash diff on $10K$7.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QDVO would cost approximately $560 in fees vs $680 for SPYI (simplified, not compounded). The $120.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QDVO ER0.56%
SPYI ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

QDVO tracks U.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlay with an options approach, while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an active approach. Beta is 0.9338 for QDVO and 0.7 for SPYI, making SPYI the less volatile of the two by this measure.

QDVO beta0.9338
SPYI beta0.7

Fund details

QDVO is managed by Amplify ETFs (launched 08/21/2024) with $779M in assets. SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $12.4B in assets.

QDVO AUM$779M
SPYI AUM$12.4B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for QDVO and SPYI?

QDVO currently distributes 11.18% and SPYI 12.05%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is QDVO or SPYI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QDVO and SPYI?

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) tracks U.S. large-cap value / dividend equities with a covered call overlay with an options approach, while SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an active approach. They are issued by Amplify ETFs and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both QDVO and SPYI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is QDVO or SPYI safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SPYI scores 90, QDVO scores 84, so SPYI's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. SPYI has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.70 vs 0.93 for QDVO). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, QDVO or SPYI?

QDVO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while SPYI charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QDVO vs SPYI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QDVO would generate roughly $93.17 cash per distribution ($1,118.00 annually). The same in SPYI would produce about $100.42 cash per distribution ($1,205.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QDVO or SPYI?

QDVO has lagged SPYI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.84% total return against 14.93%. Measured from Aug 2024 — the start of shared available history — QDVO has compounded at 20.76% a year versus 15.78% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

QDVO vs SPYI — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

QDVO and SPYI are both equity ETFs that generate high monthly income through covered call strategies overlaid on equity positions. QDVO invests in quality U.S. dividend-paying large-cap stocks and writes calls on those holdings, while SPYI uses a derivative overlay on the full S&P 500 Index. The key distinction is their underlying exposure: QDVO selects dividend-focused equities with active management, while SPYI tracks the broad S&P 500. SPYI's distribution rate is 12.05% compared to QDVO's 11.18%, though SPYI achieves this on a lower beta of 0.7 versus QDVO's 0.9338, suggesting a different risk-return tradeoff in how each fund generates income. SPYI is significantly larger with $12.4B in assets versus QDVO's $779M, and QDVO is substantially newer, having launched in 08/21/2024 compared to SPYI's 08/29/2022. Expense ratios are similar—0.68% for SPYI and 0.56% for QDVO—with QDVO's active management offset slightly by lower stated fees.

Who each is best for

QDVO: Fits investors seeking exposure to quality dividend-payers via active selection, willing to accept higher beta and concentration risk in exchange for what the fund's managers believe is better risk-adjusted income generation.

SPYI: Fits investors who want broad S&P 500 participation without stock-picking, preferring the systematic income generation of an index-based derivative overlay and the tax-efficiency that structure is designed to deliver.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at high distribution yields. Both funds pay out more than 10% annually; distributions that exceed underlying portfolio returns will gradually erode principal. At 11.18%, QDVO and 12.05%, SPYI both run this risk and warrant monitoring of NAV trends over time.
  • Covered call cap on upside. Both strategies write calls to fund income, which caps appreciation if the underlying holdings rally sharply. Investors trade away significant upside participation for monthly payouts.
  • QDVO's active selection and concentration risk. QDVO's focus on dividend-paying equities may concentrate exposure to certain sectors (utilities, REITs, energy) and introduces active management risk—there is no guarantee the stock selection outperforms the broader market to justify the strategy.
  • SPYI's early track record. Having launched in 08/29/2022, SPYI has less than two years of public performance history; the fund's ability to sustain its 12.05% yield and tax efficiency claims has yet to be tested through a full market cycle.
  • Options and derivative execution risk. Both funds rely on active options writing or derivatives to generate income. Market dislocations, rapid volatility spikes, or liquidity challenges in options markets could affect execution quality or cost.

Bottom line

QDVO appeals to investors comfortable with active management and dividend-stock concentration who believe selective buying justifies higher beta; SPYI suits those preferring index-level diversification and mechanical income generation with potential tax efficiency benefits. Both carry meaningful principal erosion risk given their distribution rates; the difference lies in whether you value active curation or systematic broad-market exposure. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.