DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

QYLD vs QQQI: Covered Call or NEOS Overlay?

A head-to-head of Global X's Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and NEOS's Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF covering option design, payout, cost, and tax approach.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • QQQIInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 14.20%, generated by selling options premium.
  • QYLDInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

QQQI has lagged QYLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.45% total return against 21.86%. Measured from Jan 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — QQQI has compounded at 18.95% a year versus 14.01% for QYLD. QYLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 11.2% against 16.5% for QQQI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Jan 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
QQQI9.73%16.45%18.95%16.5%0.650.91-9.6%
QYLD10.51%21.86%14.01%11.2%1.372.03-5.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2024” measures every fund from January 30, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricQQQIQYLD
Full nameNEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETFGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerNEOSGlobal X
Last Close$55.07 as of August 19, 2026$18.20 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield14.20%11.70%
Distribution Safety Score™ 8481
Expense ratio0.68%0.60%
AUM$14.2B$8.29B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexNASDAQ 100Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.Seeks monthly income by tracking the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index, holding the Nasdaq-100 stocks and writing a succession of one-month at-the-money covered call options on the index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date01/29/202412/11/2013
Beta1.05530.49
Last dividend$0.6518$0.1775
Ex-dividend date08/19/202607/20/2026

Bottom lineChoose QQQI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 14.20%, generated by selling options premium. Choose QYLD if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.

QYLD vs QQQI: how much Nasdaq upside is sold?

Both funds start with the Nasdaq-100 and turn option premium into monthly cash. QYLD is a systematic covered-call overwrite. QQQI is NEOS's tax-aware overlay and is built to keep more of a rally. The higher yield is usually the fund that sold more upside.

QQQIQYLD
Underlying exposureNASDAQ 100Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index
Income designNEOS tax-aware options overlaySystematic covered-call overwrite
Distribution yield14.20%11.70%
Expense ratio0.68%0.60%
Better fit forMonthly income with more upside retainedA full-index buy-write and a higher current payout
Main trade-offLower headline yield; more rally participationHigher cash yield; less of a sharp Nasdaq rally

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. QQQI and QYLD generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs19
Total AUM$32.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQI.

ETFs118
Total AUM$99.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Global X is known for developing thematic and alternative investment ETFs with a strong emphasis on income-generating strategies. Their 37-fund lineup spans diverse categories including covered call funds, SuperDividend income products, digital assets, commodities, and sector-specific investments, alongside traditional bond and risk-managed income options. Notable tickers like DIV, MLPA, and BCCC reflect their specialization in high-yield and alternative income strategies, positioning them as a provider focused on investors seeking yield-oriented and thematically-driven exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QYLD.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

QQQI offers the higher yield at 14.20% vs 11.70% for QYLD. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

QYLD is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.60% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQI is linked to NASDAQ 100 while QYLD tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

QQQI is the larger fund by assets ($14.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — QQQI distributes roughly 14.20% from selling options premium, vs 11.70% for QYLD.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Choose QYLD

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.60% expense ratio vs 0.68% for QQQI.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.5 vs 1.1 for QQQI.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQI would generate roughly $118.33/month, while QYLD would produce $97.50/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

QQQI yield14.20%
QYLD yield11.70%
Monthly diff on $10K$20.83

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQI would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $600 for QYLD (simplified, not compounded). The $80.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQI ER0.68%
QYLD ER0.60%

Strategy & risk

Both QQQI and QYLD wrap NASDAQ 100 with options-based income overlays (options and covered call). The practical differences are yield target, fee structure, and issuer track record — not the underlying mechanic. Beta is 1.0553 for QQQI and 0.49 for QYLD, making QYLD the less volatile of the two by this measure.

QQQI beta1.0553
QYLD beta0.49

Fund details

QQQI is managed by NEOS (launched 01/29/2024) with $14.2B in assets. QYLD is managed by Global X (launched 12/11/2013) with $8.29B in assets.

QQQI AUM$14.2B
QYLD AUM$8.29B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between QYLD and QQQI?

Both start with the Nasdaq-100 and sell options for cash, but they do not sell the same amount of upside. QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is a systematic covered-call fund that writes calls on the whole index and typically keeps less of a sharp rally. QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) uses NEOS's tax-aware overlay and is built to retain more upside while still paying monthly. As of August 2026 they distribute 14.20% and 11.70% at 0.68% and 0.60%. The higher payout is usually the fund that sold more upside, not the better fund. Compare total return and drawdown alongside those yields. Neither is universally better.

What is the current distribution yield for QQQI and QYLD?

QQQI currently distributes 14.20% and QYLD 11.70%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is QQQI or QYLD better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. QQQI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both QQQI and QYLD?

You can, but expect significant overlap. Both funds use options-based income strategies on NASDAQ 100, so holding them together gives you two wrappers around effectively the same exposure — not true diversification. Weigh issuer, fee, and yield differences rather than treating them as complementary.

Is QQQI or QYLD safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — QQQI scores 84, QYLD scores 81, so QQQI's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. QYLD has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.49 vs 1.06 for QQQI). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, QQQI or QYLD?

QQQI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while QYLD charges 0.60%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQI vs QYLD generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQI would generate roughly $118.33 per month ($1,420.00 annually). The same in QYLD would produce about $97.50 per month ($1,170.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, QQQI or QYLD?

QQQI has lagged QYLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.45% total return against 21.86%. Measured from Jan 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — QQQI has compounded at 18.95% a year versus 14.01% for QYLD. QYLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 11.2% against 16.5% for QQQI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

QQQI vs QYLD — at a glance

Generated August 16, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

QQQI and QYLD are both monthly-income ETFs that overlay options strategies on Nasdaq-100 holdings, but they operate differently. QQQI, launched in early 2024, targets a 13.66% distribution rate through an unspecified high-income derivative overlay. QYLD, the longer-established fund since 2013, uses a systematic covered call strategy—holding Nasdaq-100 stocks and selling one-month at-the-money calls—to generate an 11.70% yield. The key distinction: QQQI chases higher current income through a less transparent strategy, while QYLD uses a rules-based covered call framework with a documented track record.

How they differ

QQQI's distribution rate runs 196 basis points higher than QYLD's (13.66% vs. 11.70%), but the fund's strategy mechanics are not fully disclosed beyond "high income" and "tax efficient." QYLD's covered call approach is transparent: sell calls monthly, collect the premium, cap upside at the strike price. That structural difference matters for NAV behavior and volatility—QYLD's beta of 0.49 suggests its covered calls meaningfully dampen stock-market swings, whereas QQQI's beta of 1.0553 is close to the underlying index, hinting that its income generation doesn't reduce equity exposure as much. Expense ratios are comparable (QYLD at 0.61%, QQQI at 0.68%), but QQQI's $14.2B in AUM dwarfs QYLD's $8.23B despite being a brand-new fund, suggesting heavy retail inflows chasing yield. QYLD has over a decade of live performance history; QQQI has less than a year.

Who each is best for

  • QQQI: Fits investors seeking maximum current monthly income from Nasdaq-100 exposure and willing to accept a newer fund with unspecified derivative mechanics in exchange for a higher distribution rate and tax-efficiency claims.
  • QYLD: Designed for investors who understand covered calls, value transparency and a long operating history, and accept capped upside (call exercise risk) as a known tradeoff for lower—but more predictable—income and reduced portfolio volatility.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at yields above 12%. Both funds distribute more than 11% annually. At QQQI's 13.66%, sustaining distributions without meaningful Nasdaq-100 price appreciation or call premium expansion will require eating into principal; over time, NAV per share tends to drift lower. QYLD at 11.70% carries similar but slightly less acute risk.
  • Call-capped upside and opportunity cost. Covered calls (QYLD's explicit strategy, and likely central to QQQI's approach) limit gains if Nasdaq-100 rallies sharply. During a multi-month bull run, these funds will lag the unhedged index—the tradeoff for current income.
  • Strategy opacity and risk in QQQI. QQQI's derivative overlay is not defined in detail. Without knowing the precise options structure, tenor, or strike selection, investors cannot fully model tail risk or understand how income is generated during market dislocations or volatility spikes.
  • Volatility clustering and derivative repricing. Both funds' income depends on options premiums. In low-volatility environments (falling VIX), premiums compress, distribution rates fall, and NAV may stall. In sharp market downturns, both funds face realized losses on held stocks, though QYLD's lower beta suggests its calls may offer some hedge benefit.
  • Concentration in Nasdaq-100. Both track the same 100-stock mega-cap index. Holdings overlap will be substantial, and both carry identical sector concentration in tech and communication services. An investor evaluating these two should verify their holdings overlap before allocating to both.

Bottom line

If you prioritize maximum current yield and are comfortable with a newly launched fund's lack of historical record, QQQI delivers a higher distribution; if you value transparency, decade-plus performance data, and predictable covered call mechanics, QYLD's established structure offers more clarity on how income is generated. Both carry meaningful principal-erosion risk at these distribution rates if the Nasdaq-100 stagnates. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.