ETF Comparison
ROCQ vs QQQI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Data updated April 9, 2026
Side-by-side snapshot
| ROCQ | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF |
| Issuer | JPMorgan | NEOS |
| Price | $49.80 | $50.51 |
| Distribution yield | — | 14.32% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.68% |
| AUM | $105M | $9.3B |
| Distribution frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Underlying index | NASDAQ 100 | NASDAQ 100 |
| Objective | Covered Call | Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 03/19/2026 | 01/29/2024 |
| Beta | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Last dividend | — | $0.64 |
| Ex-dividend date | — | 01/21/2026 |
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Quick verdict
ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both popular monthly-pay covered call ETFs, but they take different approaches.
QQQI offers the higher yield at 14.32% vs for ROCQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
ROCQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.68%.
QQQI is the larger fund by assets ($9.3B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, ROCQ would generate roughly $0.00/month while QQQI would produce $119.33/month at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, ROCQ would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $680 for QQQI (simplified, not compounded). The $330.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
Strategy & risk
ROCQ tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach, while QQQI tracks NASDAQ 100 using a seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation. strategy. Beta is 0.0 for ROCQ and 0.0 for QQQI, indicating QQQI is less volatile relative to the market.
Fund details
ROCQ is managed by JPMorgan (launched 03/19/2026) with $105M in assets. QQQI is managed by NEOS (launched 01/29/2024) with $9.3B in assets.
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
Frequently asked questions
Is ROCQ or QQQI better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. QQQI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between ROCQ and QQQI?
ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call strategy, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) tracks NASDAQ 100 with a seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation. approach. They are issued by JPMorgan and NEOS respectively.
Can I hold both ROCQ and QQQI?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.
Which has lower fees, ROCQ or QQQI?
ROCQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQI charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in ROCQ vs QQQI generate?
At current yields, $10,000 in ROCQ would generate roughly $0.00 per month ($0.00 annually). The same in QQQI would produce about $119.33 per month ($1,432.00 annually).
More comparisons to explore
People also compare ROCQ with
People also compare QQQI with
Popular comparisons
Go deeper
Use the full ETF Comparator to add more funds, view radar charts, and generate AI reports.