DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ROCQ vs SPYI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs75
Total AUM$287B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

JPMorgan operates a diverse ETF lineup of 46 funds spanning bond, equity, factor, income, index, international, money market, municipal, and sector strategies, establishing itself as a broad-based player across multiple asset classes and investment approaches. The issuer is particularly known for its income-focused offerings, including popular tickers like JEPI (Equity Premium Income) and JEPQ (Equity Premium Income ETF), which employ covered call and options strategies to generate distributions. JPMorgan's portfolio ranges from core index and fixed income funds to specialized sector and international equity ETFs, positioning the firm to serve both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors across diversified markets.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROCQ.

ETFs19
Total AUM$30.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

Side-by-side snapshot

ROCQSPYI
Full nameJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETFNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerJPMorganNEOS
Last Close$54.91 as of July 21, 2026$53.01 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield11.43%12.02%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5090
Expense ratio0.35%0.68%
AUM$382M$10.7B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexNASDAQ 100S&P 500 Index
ObjectiveDesigned to deliver current yield while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation and total return.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/19/202608/29/2022
Beta0.7
Last dividend$0.5230$0.5310
Ex-dividend date07/01/202606/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose ROCQ if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose SPYI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 12.02%, generated by selling options premium.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SPYI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 12.3% against 19.3% for ROCQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Mar 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ROCQ13.26%13.26%19.3%1.722.50-5.7%
SPYI7.07%9.46%12.3%1.872.82-3.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Mar 2026” measures every fund from March 19, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Mar 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Mar 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 12.02% vs 11.43% for ROCQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

ROCQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: ROCQ is linked to NASDAQ 100 while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPYI has $10.7B in assets vs $382M for ROCQ, but ROCQ only launched March 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Who should choose each?

Choose ROCQ

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.35% expense ratio vs 0.68% for SPYI.

Choose SPYI

NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — SPYI distributes roughly 12.02% from selling options premium, vs 11.43% for ROCQ.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer an established track record — ROCQ only launched March 2026.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ROCQ would generate roughly $95.25/month, while SPYI would produce $100.17/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

ROCQ yield11.43%
SPYI yield12.02%
Monthly diff on $10K$4.92

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ROCQ would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $680 for SPYI (simplified, not compounded). The $330.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ROCQ ER0.35%
SPYI ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

ROCQ tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach, while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach.

ROCQ beta
SPYI beta0.7

Fund details

ROCQ is managed by JPMorgan (launched 03/19/2026) with $382M in assets. SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $10.7B in assets.

ROCQ AUM$382M
SPYI AUM$10.7B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is ROCQ or SPYI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between ROCQ and SPYI?

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach, while SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach. They are issued by JPMorgan and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both ROCQ and SPYI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, ROCQ or SPYI?

ROCQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SPYI charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ROCQ vs SPYI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in ROCQ would generate roughly $95.25 per month ($1,143.00 annually). The same in SPYI would produce about $100.17 per month ($1,202.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ROCQ or SPYI?

SPYI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 12.3% against 19.3% for ROCQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ROCQ vs SPYI — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

ROCQ and SPYI are both equity ETFs that use options overlay strategies to generate high monthly distributions from broad U.S. stock indexes. The key distinction: ROCQ overlays call options on the Nasdaq 100, targeting a tech-heavy portfolio with an 11.05% distribution rate, while SPYI writes calls against S&P 500 holdings and aims for tax efficiency alongside a higher 11.87% yield. Both use covered call strategies to fund distributions, but their underlying index exposure and distribution philosophy differ materially.

How they differ

The biggest difference is underlying index choice and risk profile. ROCQ targets the Nasdaq 100—concentrated in large-cap technology—while SPYI holds the broader S&P 500. This shows up in beta: ROCQ reports a beta of 0.0, suggesting the overlay substantially dampens market correlation, while SPYI carries a beta of 0.7, implying it moves with the market more naturally.

Second, SPYI has meaningfully larger assets ($10.5B vs. $377M), suggesting deeper trading liquidity and lower bid-ask spreads for investors. The difference in expense ratios is modest—0.35% for ROCQ versus 0.68% for SPYI—but SPYI's larger scale and tax-efficiency language imply different operational approaches to the same overlay strategy.

Third, SPYI explicitly targets tax efficiency and began operations in August 2022, accumulating a longer performance history than ROCQ's March 2026 inception. The higher distribution rate (11.87% vs. 11.05%) combined with SPYI's tax-efficiency design suggests it may optimize call strike selection and exercise timing to reduce taxable events for shareholders.

Who each is best for

ROCQ: Fits investors drawn to Nasdaq 100 concentration who want to harvest tech sector upside through a dampened equity overlay, accepting that the strategy's reduced beta may mean sitting out strong broad-market rallies.

SPYI: Designed for investors seeking S&P 500-like diversification with higher yield, who value tax-conscious income generation and are comfortable with moderate equity market exposure (beta near 0.7) to capture typical market participation.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at sustained high yields. Both funds distribute 11%+ annually, raising the risk that underlying equity gains and call premiums don't fully cover the payout, eroding net asset value over time. This is especially acute if equity markets decline or volatility contracts, reducing call premium income.
  • Call assignment and opportunity cost. When covered calls are exercised, shareholders surrender gains above the call strike. In a rising market, this caps upside; in a falling market, it doesn't prevent losses. ROCQ's zero beta suggests aggressive call structures that may sacrifice material appreciation.
  • Nasdaq 100 concentration (ROCQ). Heavy exposure to a small number of mega-cap tech stocks heightens single-sector risk. A meaningful pullback in large-cap technology would directly pressure ROCQ's underlying holdings and call premium income.
  • Implied volatility dependency. Both strategies rely on option premiums; falling volatility shrinks the income available to fund distributions. A period of low equity volatility could force distribution cuts or accelerate capital erosion.
  • Index overlap risk. While SPYI's broader S&P 500 mandate differs from ROCQ's Nasdaq focus, their actual holdings likely overlap significantly in mega-cap tech names, so they may not provide the diversification benefit their indexes suggest.

Bottom line

If you want broad U.S. stock exposure with tax-efficient income and moderate market participation, SPYI's larger asset base, longer track record, and S&P 500 diversification stand out. If you're willing to accept Nasdaq 100 concentration and a dampened equity beta in exchange for tech exposure and lower fees, ROCQ offers an alternative—though its short inception date leaves limited history to judge whether the yield is sustainable. Both face the core challenge of funding double-digit distributions in a volatile rate environment; neither structure guarantees the yield will hold if markets soften or volatility declines.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.