DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ROCQ vs SPYI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated June 29, 2026

ETFs66
Total AUM$281B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

JPMorgan operates a diverse ETF lineup of 46 funds spanning bond, equity, factor, income, index, international, money market, municipal, and sector strategies, establishing itself as a broad-based player across multiple asset classes and investment approaches. The issuer is particularly known for its income-focused offerings, including popular tickers like JEPI (Equity Premium Income) and JEPQ (Equity Premium Income ETF), which employ covered call and options strategies to generate distributions. JPMorgan's portfolio ranges from core index and fixed income funds to specialized sector and international equity ETFs, positioning the firm to serve both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors across diversified markets.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROCQ.

ETFs19
Total AUM$24.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

Side-by-side snapshot

ROCQSPYI
Full nameJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETFNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerJPMorganNEOS
Last Close$55.89 as of June 29, 2026$51.99 as of June 29, 2026
Distribution yield10.67%12.26%
Distribution Safety Score5092
Expense ratio0.35%0.68%
AUM$316M$6.20B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexNASDAQ 100S&P 500 Index
ObjectiveDesigned to deliver current yield while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation and total return.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/19/202608/29/2022
Beta0.69
Last dividend$0.4970$0.5310
Ex-dividend date06/01/202601/21/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SPYI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.4% against 19.4% for ROCQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Mar 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ROCQ14.23%14.23%19.4%2.313.39-5.7%
SPYI2.93%5.23%13.4%1.101.57-3.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of June 26, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Mar 2026” measures every fund from March 19, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Mar 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Mar 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 12.26% vs 10.67% for ROCQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

ROCQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: ROCQ is linked to NASDAQ 100 while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPYI has $6.20B in assets vs $316M for ROCQ, but ROCQ only launched March 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ROCQ would generate roughly $88.92/month, while SPYI would produce $102.17/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

ROCQ yield10.67%
SPYI yield12.26%
Monthly diff on $10K$13.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ROCQ would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $680 for SPYI (simplified, not compounded). The $330.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ROCQ ER0.35%
SPYI ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

ROCQ tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach, while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach.

ROCQ beta
SPYI beta0.69

Fund details

ROCQ is managed by JPMorgan (launched 03/19/2026) with $316M in assets. SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $6.20B in assets.

ROCQ AUM$316M
SPYI AUM$6.20B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is ROCQ or SPYI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between ROCQ and SPYI?

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach, while SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach. They are issued by JPMorgan and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both ROCQ and SPYI?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, ROCQ or SPYI?

ROCQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SPYI charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ROCQ vs SPYI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in ROCQ would generate roughly $88.92 per month ($1,067.00 annually). The same in SPYI would produce about $102.17 per month ($1,226.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ROCQ or SPYI?

SPYI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.4% against 19.4% for ROCQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ROCQ vs SPYI — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

ROCQ and SPYI are both equity-linked ETFs that use options overlay strategies to generate high monthly income from broad market indexes. ROCQ targets the Nasdaq 100 via covered calls, while SPYI targets the S&P 500 using a similar options-based approach. The key distinction is their underlying exposure: ROCQ offers concentrated Nasdaq upside, while SPYI provides broader large-cap diversification.

How they differ

The most fundamental difference is their underlying index and beta profile. ROCQ is built on the Nasdaq 100—skewed toward tech and growth—and reports a beta of 0.0, suggesting its derivatives strategy may substantially dampen market correlation. SPYI tracks the S&P 500 and carries a beta of 0.69, indicating it retains meaningful equity market exposure. SPYI also distributes at a higher rate—12.26% versus ROCQ's 10.67%—but charges 0.68% in expenses compared to ROCQ's 0.35%. SPYI has substantially larger assets under management at $6.20B versus ROCQ's $316M, and SPYI has been operating since August 2022, while ROCQ is much newer, having launched in March 2026.

Who each is best for

ROCQ: Fits investors seeking Nasdaq-weighted exposure with a synthetic income overlay who prioritize lower fees and are comfortable with a tech-heavy portfolio that may behave differently from traditional equity risk factors.

SPYI: Designed for investors who want broad S&P 500 exposure combined with monthly income, tax-efficient distributions, and meaningful equity beta—and who accept higher fees for a larger, more established fund with longer track record.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at high distribution yields: Both funds distribute well above typical equity dividend yields. At 10–12% annual payouts, the funds are likely relying on return-of-capital treatment and options premium capture. If equity markets decline or implied volatility contracts, NAV can erode faster than capital gains offset distributions.
  • Covered call cap on upside: Both funds use call options to generate income, capping the fund's participation in sharp rallies. A sustained bull market in equities would constrain ROCQ and SPYI gains relative to unlevered index exposure.
  • ROCQ's structural opacity: ROCQ's reported beta of 0.0 is unusual for an equity fund and suggests either a very recent inception (it just launched in March 2026) with limited data, or significant downside hedging that could disconnect it from equity returns in ways not yet tested over a full market cycle.
  • SPYI concentration in top 10 holdings: The S&P 500 is increasingly dominated by mega-cap tech. While more diversified than Nasdaq 100, SPYI inherits this concentration risk, amplified by an options strategy that may sell calls on the largest positions.
  • Reinvestment and roll risk: Both funds rely on continuous call-selling at favorable prices. In a low-volatility environment or steep market downturn, the ability to write new calls at profitable strikes could deteriorate, pressuring future income.

Bottom line

If you prioritize a narrower, tech-focused mandate with the lowest fees, ROCQ's Nasdaq 100 exposure and 0.35% expense ratio appeal. If you value established track record, broad market diversification, and don't mind higher fees for a larger fund with meaningful equity beta, SPYI's $6.20B scale and August 2022 launch date offer more history. Both carry the structural risk that high distributions may depend on return-of-capital treatment and option premium capture—dynamics that shift with volatility and market direction. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.