DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ROCQ vs SPYI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

ROCQ has outpaced SPYI over the year to date, posting a 15.66% total return against 9.34%. SPYI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 12.0% against 19.3% for ROCQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTDSince Mar 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ROCQ15.66%15.66%19.3%1.582.35-8.0%
SPYI9.34%11.79%12.0%1.852.80-3.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Mar 2026” measures every fund from March 19, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Mar 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Mar 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricROCQSPYI
Full nameJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETFNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerJPMorganNEOS
Last Close$55.54 as of August 19, 2026$54.04 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield15.30%12.04%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5090
Expense ratio0.35%0.68%
AUM$489M$11.6B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexNASDAQ 100S&P 500 Index
ObjectiveDesigned to deliver current yield while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation and total return.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/19/202608/29/2022
Beta0.7
Last dividend$0.7080$0.5423
Ex-dividend date08/03/202608/19/2026

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: ROCQ launched March 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — ROCQ charges 0.35% against 0.68% for SPYI, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. ROCQ and SPYI generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs79
Total AUM$345B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

JPMorgan is a major provider of ETFs spanning multiple asset classes and strategies, with particular strength in income-focused funds including their popular covered call strategy lineup. Their fund family encompasses broad categories including bond, equity, factor, income, index, international, municipal, and sector ETFs, providing investors with diverse exposure options across markets and investment styles. The issuer offers both core indexed strategies and actively managed solutions, serving investors seeking everything from traditional dividend income to sophisticated factor-based and thematic approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROCQ.

ETFs19
Total AUM$32.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

ROCQ offers the higher yield at 15.30% vs 12.04% for SPYI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

ROCQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: ROCQ is linked to NASDAQ 100 while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPYI has $11.6B in assets vs $489M for ROCQ, but ROCQ only launched March 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ROCQ would generate roughly $127.50/month, while SPYI would produce $100.33/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

ROCQ yield15.30%
SPYI yield12.04%
Monthly diff on $10K$27.17

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ROCQ would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $680 for SPYI (simplified, not compounded). The $330.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ROCQ ER0.35%
SPYI ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

ROCQ tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach, while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach.

ROCQ beta
SPYI beta0.7

Fund details

ROCQ is managed by JPMorgan (launched 03/19/2026) with $489M in assets. SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $11.6B in assets.

ROCQ AUM$489M
SPYI AUM$11.6B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for ROCQ and SPYI?

ROCQ currently distributes 15.30% and SPYI 12.04%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is ROCQ or SPYI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. ROCQ currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between ROCQ and SPYI?

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) tracks NASDAQ 100 with a covered call approach, while SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach. They are issued by JPMorgan and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both ROCQ and SPYI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is ROCQ or SPYI safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SPYI scores 90, ROCQ scores 50, so SPYI's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, ROCQ or SPYI?

ROCQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SPYI charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ROCQ vs SPYI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in ROCQ would generate roughly $127.50 per month ($1,530.00 annually). The same in SPYI would produce about $100.33 per month ($1,204.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ROCQ or SPYI?

ROCQ has outpaced SPYI over the year to date, posting a 15.66% total return against 9.34%. SPYI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 12.0% against 19.3% for ROCQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ROCQ vs SPYI — at a glance

Generated August 16, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

ROCQ and SPYI are both option-overlay ETFs that generate monthly income by selling call options against broad-market equity indexes. ROCQ uses the NASDAQ 100 and targets a 15.05% distribution rate, while SPYI tracks the S&P 500 and yields 11.69%. The key distinction is their underlying exposure: ROCQ's tech-heavy NASDAQ focus versus SPYI's larger, more diversified large-cap base.

How they differ

The biggest difference is their underlying index. ROCQ overlays covered calls on the NASDAQ 100 (concentrated in technology and growth stocks), while SPYI does the same on the S&P 500 (500 large-cap companies across sectors). This gives ROCQ substantially higher yield—15.05% versus SPYI's 11.69%—but the cost of that higher income is sector concentration and greater sensitivity to tech volatility.

SPYI has a much larger asset base ($11.4B versus $481M), suggesting stronger liquidity and lower trading costs. ROCQ's expense ratio is cheaper at 0.35% compared to SPYI's 0.68%, but that advantage is dwarfed by the yield gap. ROCQ reports zero beta, which appears to reflect its option-overlay structure sheltering it from market moves, while SPYI's 0.7 beta suggests it still captures most broad-market swings.

Who each is best for

ROCQ: Fits investors who prioritize maximum monthly income and can tolerate concentrated exposure to the NASDAQ 100's technology and growth stocks, accepting that call caps limit upside if those sectors rally sharply.

SPYI: Designed for investors seeking high current yield while maintaining diversified exposure across the S&P 500, accepting a lower distribution rate in exchange for broader sector and company representation.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. ROCQ's 15.05% distribution rate substantially exceeds typical S&P 500 total returns, creating a strong likelihood that NAV will decline over time even if the underlying NASDAQ 100 is flat. SPYI's 11.69% yield also risks NAV erosion, though less dramatically, if equity returns disappoint.
  • Call-cap limitation on upside. Both funds systematically sell call options, capping capital gains if the underlying index rallies. ROCQ's NASDAQ 100 exposure means investors forego outsized gains if tech leadership accelerates; SPYI caps S&P 500 upside more broadly.
  • Concentration in tech and growth (ROCQ). The NASDAQ 100 is heavily weighted toward technology, communication, and consumer-discretionary stocks. A downturn in those sectors hits ROCQ far harder than SPYI, which benefits from defensive and financial stocks' stability.
  • Options market risk. Both funds depend on option premiums remaining elevated enough to sustain their distributions. If implied volatility falls sharply, call premiums compress and distributions may decline.
  • ROCQ's nascent track record. Launched in March 2026, ROCQ has less than a year of actual performance history, leaving less data to assess how its yield behaves through different market regimes.

Bottom line

If you need maximum monthly income and are comfortable with NASDAQ 100 concentration and downside from tech volatility, ROCQ's yield advantage is significant. If you prioritize diversification across the full S&P 500 and prefer a more sustainable distribution yield from a fund with a longer operating history and larger asset base, SPYI presents a clearer fit. Both funds will likely see NAV erosion if equity returns lag their distribution rates; past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.