DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SCHF vs VEA: Same Developed-Ex-US Idea, Two Issuers

A head-to-head of Schwab International Equity and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets covering index, cost, and overlap.

Updated October 16, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SCHFInvestors who want higher current income (3.13% paid over the past 12 months vs 2.45% for VEA).
  • VEAInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SCHF has outpaced VEA over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.04% total return against 17.60%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SCHF has compounded at 9.90% a year, against 9.84% for VEA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Nov 2009Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SCHF12.70%18.04%20.23%9.59%9.90%7.51%15.7%0.911.32-13.4%
VEA12.29%17.60%20.30%9.34%9.84%7.64%15.7%0.911.33-13.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Nov 2009” measures every fund from November 3, 2009 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSCHFVEA
Full nameSchwab International Equity ETFVanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
IssuerSchwabVanguard
Underlying indexFTSE Developed ex US Index (Net)FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index
Last Close$26.93 as of October 16, 2026$69.49 as of October 16, 2026
Distribution rate1.23%1.02%
Trailing 12-month yield3.13%2.45%
Distribution Safety Score™ 8370
Safety-Adjusted Yield 1.02%0.71%
Expense ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$67.8B$228B
Distribution frequencySemi-AnnualQuarterly
ObjectiveProvide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.Track the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date11/03/200907/20/2007
Beta1.050.98
Last dividend$0.165$0.178
Ex-dividend date06/24/202609/18/2026

Bottom lineChoose SCHF if you want higher current income (3.13% paid over the past 12 months vs 2.45% for VEA). Choose VEA if you want broad equity exposure.

VEA vs SCHF: two developed-ex-US market funds

Both hold developed markets outside the US. Issuer, index, and cost differ; holding both mostly doubles the same book.

SCHFVEA
GeographyDeveloped ex-USDeveloped ex-US
IssuerSchwabVanguard
Expense ratio0.03%0.03%
Fund size$67.8B$228B

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs33
Total AUM$616B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Schwab offers ETFs across U.S. and international equities, fixed income, and other investment categories. Its dividend-focused lineup includes SCHD, which seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index and selects dividend-paying U.S. companies for fundamental strength. Fund objectives and tracked indexes differ across the lineup.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SCHF.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4.66T

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VEA.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SCHF has paid the higher yield over the past 12 months, 3.13% vs 2.45% for VEA. We compare trailing 12-month yields here because SCHF's latest distribution annualizes to 1.23% against 3.13% actually paid over the past 12 months, and VEA's latest distribution annualizes to 1.02% against 2.45% actually paid over the past 12 months, so annualizing a single payment would misstate their income.

They have different reference exposures: SCHF is linked to FTSE Developed ex US Index (Net) while VEA is linked to FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VEA is the larger fund by assets ($228B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SCHF would generate roughly $61.50 cash per distribution, while VEA would produce $25.50 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

SCHF yield1.23%
VEA yield1.02%
Cash diff on $10K$36.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SCHF would cost approximately $30 in fees vs $30 for VEA (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

SCHF ER0.03%
VEA ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex US Index (Net) with an international approach, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index with an international approach. Beta is 1.05 for SCHF and 0.98 for VEA, making VEA the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SCHF beta1.05
VEA beta0.98

Fund details

SCHF is managed by Schwab (launched 11/03/2009) with $67.8B in assets. VEA is managed by Vanguard (launched 07/20/2007) with $228B in assets.

SCHF AUM$67.8B
VEA AUM$228B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between VEA and SCHF?

Both hold developed markets outside the US. SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) is Schwab's international equity fund. VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) is Vanguard's FTSE developed-markets fund. Cost is 0.03% versus 0.03%; size is $67.8B versus $228B. Distributions are 1.23% and 1.02% as of October 2026. Holding both mostly doubles the same developed-ex-US book.

What is the current distribution rate for SCHF and VEA?

SCHF currently distributes 1.23% and VEA 1.02%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SCHF or VEA better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SCHF has paid the higher trailing 12-month yield (3.13% vs 2.45%). We compare trailing 12-month yields here because SCHF's latest distribution annualizes to 1.23% against 3.13% actually paid over the past 12 months, and VEA's latest distribution annualizes to 1.02% against 2.45% actually paid over the past 12 months, so annualizing a single payment would misstate their income. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both SCHF and VEA?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SCHF or VEA safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SCHF scores 83, VEA scores 70, so SCHF's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SCHF or VEA?

SCHF and VEA both charge the same expense ratio of 0.03%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in SCHF vs VEA generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SCHF would generate roughly $61.50 cash per distribution ($123.00 annually). The same in VEA would produce about $25.50 cash per distribution ($102.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SCHF or VEA?

SCHF has outpaced VEA over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.04% total return against 17.60%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SCHF has compounded at 9.90% a year, against 9.84% for VEA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SCHF vs VEA — at a glance

Generated October 17, 2026.

Overview

SCHF and VEA are both index-tracking ETFs offering exposure to developed markets outside the U.S., but they differ in index methodology and distribution cadence. Both charge 0.03%, making them among the cheapest developed markets equity options available.

How they differ

The most significant difference is their underlying index construction. VEA's All Cap version includes mid- and small-cap stocks alongside large-caps, while SCHF's index focuses more narrowly on larger companies. This means VEA has broader geographic and market-cap diversification, which historically carries slightly higher volatility.

Who each is best for

SCHF: Fits investors seeking the smallest possible expense ratio combined with a large-cap focused exposure to developed international markets; works particularly well for those who prefer semi-annual distributions and don't need the added complexity of mid-cap and small-cap holdings.

VEA: Designed for investors who value broader diversification across market capitalizations within developed ex-U.S.

Key risks to know

  • Index methodology divergence: VEA's all-cap approach will capture more earnings volatility from mid- and small-cap holdings. If smaller companies underperform large-caps (a cyclical pattern), VEA's returns may lag SCHF's, and vice versa. Overlapping holdings are likely, but tracking different indexes means performance gaps are normal, not a sign of fund drift.
  • Currency risk: Both funds hold significant positions in non-U.S. currencies (euro, pound, yen, etc.). A strengthening U.S. dollar will reduce returns for dollar-based investors; a weakening dollar will enhance them. This is structural to the strategy, not a timing risk.
  • Valuation sensitivity to developed markets weakness: Developed international equities trade at lower price-to-earnings multiples than U.S. large-caps. A sustained preference for U.S. equities or rising interest rates in developed markets could extend the international underperformance cycle that has persisted for years.

Bottom line

If you want the tightest index-tracking experience with a tighter hold on larger, more established companies, SCHF's ultra-low fee and large-cap focus stand out. If you prefer broader market-cap exposure and benefit from quarterly distributions and the largest asset base available, VEA's all-cap methodology is the natural fit. Both are extremely low-cost core holdings for international equity allocation; the choice hinges on whether you lean toward large-cap purity or broader diversification. Past performance doesn't predict future returns, and currency movements can significantly affect outcomes regardless of which fund you hold.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.