DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SLV vs SLVP: Own the Metal, or Mine It?

A head-to-head of the iShares Silver Trust and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners covering equity risk versus bullion.

Updated October 16, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SLVInvestors who want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and market stress.
  • SLVPInvestors who want higher current income (0.82% while SLV makes no distribution).

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SLV has lagged SLVP over the trailing twelve months, posting a 4.76% total return against 9.96%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SLVP has compounded at 12.29% a year, against 12.01% for SLV. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Feb 2012Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SLV-20.04%4.76%35.55%19.00%12.01%3.00%44.4%0.590.76-52.4%
SLVP-1.30%9.96%57.52%21.15%12.29%3.37%47.1%0.881.26-39.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Feb 2012” measures every fund from February 2, 2012 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Not a distribution payer

SLV (iShares Silver Trust) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. SLV is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSLVSLVP
Full nameiShares Silver TrustiShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
Underlying indexSilver bullion spot priceMSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index
Last Close$51.51 as of October 16, 2026$33.68 as of October 16, 2026
Distribution rate—0.82%
Trailing 12-month yield—2.09%
Distribution Safety Score™ —70
Safety-Adjusted Yield —0.57%
Expense ratio0.50%0.39%
AUM$29.7B$890M
Distribution frequencyNoneSemi-Annual
ObjectiveReflect the performance of the price of silver bullion less trust expenses.Seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, composed of global companies primarily engaged in silver mining and exploration and related metals mining.
Asset classCommodityEquity
Inception date04/21/200601/31/2012
Beta1.221.18
Last dividend—$0.138
Ex-dividend date—06/15/2026

Bottom lineChoose SLV if you want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and market stress. Choose SLVP if you want higher current income (0.82% while SLV makes no distribution).

SLV vs SLVP: silver bullion or silver miners?

SLV holds the metal. SLVP holds the companies that dig it up. Equity operating leverage versus bullion is the decision.

SLVSLVP
What you ownPhysical silver in trustSilver-mining stocks
Expense ratio0.50%0.39%
Distribution rateNone (bullion)0.82%

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs468
Total AUM$4.70T

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares, operated by BlackRock, is one of the largest and most established ETF providers globally, known for offering broad, liquid index-tracking funds across nearly all asset classes and investment styles. The lineup encompasses a comprehensive range of strategies including core equity and bond exposure, dividend and income-focused funds, covered call strategies, ESG and thematic investments, factor-based approaches, alternatives, commodities, and municipal bonds, serving both individual and institutional investors. With numerous popular ticker symbols and extensive diversification across geographies, sectors, and investment objectives, iShares provides one of the market's widest selections of ETFs for building diversified portfolios.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SLV and SLVP.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SLVP currently shows a 0.82% distribution yield. SLV has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

SLVP is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.39% compared to 0.50%.

They have different reference exposures: SLV is linked to Silver bullion spot price while SLVP is linked to MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SLV is the larger fund by assets ($29.7B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SLV has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while SLVP would produce $41.00 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

SLV yield—
SLVP yield0.82%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SLV would cost approximately $500 in fees vs $390 for SLVP (simplified, not compounded). The $110.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SLV ER0.50%
SLVP ER0.39%

Strategy & risk

SLV tracks Silver bullion spot price with a metals approach, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index with a metals approach. Beta is 1.22 for SLV and 1.18 for SLVP — effectively similar market sensitivity.

SLV beta1.22
SLVP beta1.18

Fund details

SLV is managed by iShares (launched 04/21/2006) with $29.7B in assets. SLVP is managed by iShares (launched 01/31/2012) with $890M in assets.

SLV AUM$29.7B
SLVP AUM$890M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SLV and SLVP?

SLV (iShares Silver Trust) holds silver bullion and pays no income. SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) holds silver-mining stocks and distributes 0.82%. Cost is 0.50% versus 0.39% as of October 2026. Miners add equity, operating, and country risk on top of the metal. They are not substitutes.

Which of SLV or SLVP pays more dividend income?

SLVP currently reports a distribution yield, while SLV has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

Can I hold both SLV and SLVP?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, SLV or SLVP?

SLV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SLVP charges 0.39%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SLV vs SLVP generate?

At current rates, SLV does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate. The same in SLVP would produce about $41.00 cash per distribution ($82.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SLV or SLVP?

SLV has lagged SLVP over the trailing twelve months, posting a 4.76% total return against 9.96%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SLVP has compounded at 12.29% a year, against 12.01% for SLV. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SLV vs SLVP — at a glance

Generated October 17, 2026.

Overview

SLV and SLVP both track silver but through fundamentally different mechanisms. The distinction matters: one captures commodity price exposure, the other captures company earnings and operational leverage tied to silver production.

How they differ

The core difference is asset class. This means SLV has no earnings power—it rises and falls with spot silver—whereas SLVP's returns depend on miners' profitability, cash flow, and capital discipline. SLV has $29.7B in assets and a 0.50% expense ratio; SLVP holds $890M and charges 0.39%, making SLVP cheaper to own despite its smaller size. Both have similar beta—1.22 for SLV and 1.18 for SLVP—suggesting comparable volatility to broad markets, though they measure different underlying drivers.

Who each is best for

  • SLV: Investors seeking pure commodity price exposure to silver without company selection risk or earnings volatility. Fits those who view silver as an inflation hedge or diversification tool and want direct metal participation without equity leverage.
  • SLVP: Investors comfortable with mining company equity risk who believe silver prices will reward operational and capital-efficient producers. Fits those seeking leverage to silver price moves through mining company earnings and exploration upside, accepting company-specific and execution risks.

Key risks to know

  • Commodity price concentration (SLV): SLV moves dollar-for-dollar with spot silver prices. In a prolonged metal bear market or deflationary period, there is no earnings cushion or diversification—the fund reflects the commodity's decline directly.
  • Mining leverage and operational risk (SLVP): SLVP's returns amplify silver price moves through mining economics, but also expose holders to mining-company-specific risks including project delays, labor disputes, environmental remediation costs, and management capital allocation decisions. A miner can underperform even if silver prices rise if operations stumble.
  • Currency exposure (SLVP): SLVP tracks global mining companies across many currencies. Silver prices are set in U.S. dollars, but mining company earnings reflect foreign exchange headwinds or tailwinds—a strengthening dollar can crimp earnings translated back to USD even if physical silver prices hold.
  • Structural mismatch in up markets (SLV): During strong silver rallies, SLV's lack of operating leverage means it captures the move linearly. SLVP may outpace it if miners expand margins, but SLVP also underperforms if mining costs rise faster than silver prices climb.

Bottom line

If you want silver commodity exposure without picking mining companies, SLV offers direct metal participation at low cost. If you believe silver prices will reward efficient producers and are willing to accept mining business risk for operational leverage, SLVP offers equity-style participation. Neither choice predicts future returns—picking between them depends on whether you view silver as a pure commodity hedge or as an input to mining company returns.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.