DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SMH vs VGT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of VanEck Semiconductor ETF and Vanguard Information Technology ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs83
Total AUM$156B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SMH.

ETFs115
Total AUM$4484B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that emphasize broad market exposure and long-term investing. The company operates 175 ETFs across diverse fund families including Index, Bond, Equity, Dividend, Income, International, Factor, and ESG strategies, serving investors with various goals from core portfolio building to specialized income generation. Notable for its scale and popular tickers like VB (total U.S. small-cap), BND (total bond market), and VBIAX (international bonds), Vanguard focuses on providing comprehensive, index-based investment solutions with an emphasis on cost efficiency and accessibility.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VGT.

Side-by-side snapshot

SMHVGT
Full nameVanEck Semiconductor ETFVanguard Information Technology ETF
IssuerVanEckVanguard
Last Close$592.29 as of July 4, 2026$114.64 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield0.19%0.48%
Distribution Safety Score9389
Expense ratio0.35%0.10%
AUM$65.1B$143B
Distribution frequencyAnnualQuarterly
Underlying indexMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 IndexBasket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings)
ObjectiveTrack the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.Seeks to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Index/Information Technology 25/50, an index made up of stocks of large, mid-size, and small U.S. companies within the information technology sector, including technology software and services, hardware and equipment, and semiconductor manufacturers.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date12/20/201101/26/2004
Beta1.971.42
Last dividend$1.1050$0.1384
Ex-dividend date12/22/202506/24/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SMH has outpaced VGT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 115.39% total return against 40.16%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SMH has compounded at 36.81% a year, against 25.04% for VGT. VGT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.2% against 36.0% for SMH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Jan 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SMH58.66%115.39%57.57%36.41%36.81%19.76%36.0%1.141.63-35.7%
VGT21.44%40.16%28.30%18.86%25.04%14.92%24.2%0.851.20-27.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2004” measures every fund from January 30, 2004 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VGT offers the higher yield at 0.48% vs 0.19% for SMH. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VGT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.10% compared to 0.35%.

They track different benchmarks: SMH is linked to MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index while VGT tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings), which means their performance drivers differ.

VGT is the larger fund by assets ($143B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SMH would generate roughly $1.58/month, while VGT would produce $4.00/month, at current distribution rates.

SMH yield0.19%
VGT yield0.48%
Monthly diff on $10K$2.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SMH would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $100 for VGT (simplified, not compounded). The $250.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SMH ER0.35%
VGT ER0.10%

Strategy & risk

SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach, while VGT tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings) with a basket approach. Beta is 1.97 for SMH and 1.42 for VGT, indicating VGT is less volatile relative to the market.

SMH beta1.97
VGT beta1.42

Fund details

SMH is managed by VanEck (launched 12/20/2011) with $65.1B in assets. VGT is managed by Vanguard (launched 01/26/2004) with $143B in assets.

SMH AUM$65.1B
VGT AUM$143B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is SMH or VGT better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. VGT currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SMH and VGT?

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings) with a basket approach. They are issued by VanEck and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both SMH and VGT?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, SMH or VGT?

SMH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VGT charges 0.10%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SMH vs VGT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SMH would generate roughly $1.58 per month ($19.00 annually). The same in VGT would produce about $4.00 per month ($48.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SMH or VGT?

SMH has outpaced VGT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 115.39% total return against 40.16%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SMH has compounded at 36.81% a year, against 25.04% for VGT. VGT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.2% against 36.0% for SMH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SMH vs VGT — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

SMH and VGT are both U.S. technology-focused equity ETFs, but they operate at very different levels of specificity. SMH tracks a narrow 25-stock index of semiconductor manufacturers only, making it a concentrated bet on the chip industry. VGT holds a much broader basket of large, mid, and small-cap U.S. technology companies across software, services, hardware, and semiconductors, tracking the MSCI U.S. Information Technology index. The result is a choice between pure semiconductor exposure versus diversified tech sector exposure.

How they differ

The single biggest difference is scope: SMH owns exactly 25 semiconductor stocks, while VGT holds hundreds of companies across the entire tech sector. This makes SMH roughly three times as volatile—its beta of 1.97 versus VGT's 1.42 reflects that narrower, higher-risk profile.

On yield and distribution, VGT pays nearly three times the distribution rate (0.48% vs. 0.17%), paid quarterly rather than annually. VGT's expense ratio is substantially lower at 0.10% compared to SMH's 0.35%, a meaningful difference over time given both funds' large asset bases.

SMH is older (inception 2011 vs. 2004) but has grown to $65.1B in AUM, while VGT commands $143B—a signal of VGT's broader institutional and retail appeal. The portfolio construction also differs: SMH uses a pure index methodology, while VGT's holding structure as a diversified basket introduces less concentration risk by design.

Who each is best for

SMH: Investors with high risk tolerance who want pure-play semiconductor sector exposure and can tolerate 2x market volatility. Fits portfolios where semiconductor cyclicality and growth are the desired outcome, or where a tactical overweight to chips makes sense relative to a broader tech allocation.

VGT: Investors seeking broad-based technology sector exposure with lower volatility than SMH. Fits buy-and-hold portfolios that want the growth of tech without betting the entire position on semiconductor cycles, and works for those prioritizing lower costs and modest quarterly income.

Key risks to know

  • Concentration within semiconductors (SMH): A 25-stock index is inherently concentrated, meaning poor performance or downturns in a few major chip manufacturers can significantly drag the whole fund. This is SMH's defining risk relative to VGT's hundreds-of-holding basket approach.
  • Semiconductor cycle risk (SMH): Chip demand and pricing move in cycles tied to capex spending, inventory levels, and technology adoption. SMH's undiversified exposure means it amplifies both upside and downside moves tied to these cycles.
  • High beta volatility (SMH): A beta of 1.97 means SMH swings roughly twice as hard as the broader market during downturns. Investors with moderate risk tolerance or shorter time horizons may find the drawdowns difficult.
  • Sector concentration (VGT): While VGT is more diversified than SMH, it remains fully exposed to information technology. A broad tech sector decline—whether regulatory, cyclical, or valuation-driven—affects all holdings simultaneously with no buffer from other sectors.
  • Valuation multiples for both: Technology stocks, especially semiconductors, have historically traded at elevated multiples during growth cycles. Both funds reflect current tech valuations and carry the risk of multiple compression if growth slows or rates rise further.

Bottom line

If you want concentrated semiconductor exposure and can tolerate nearly 2x market volatility, SMH offers a pure-play index on 25 chip stocks. If you prefer diversification across the technology sector at lower cost and volatility, VGT's broader basket and 0.10% expense ratio stand out. Past performance does not predict future results, and both funds carry sector and market timing risks that merit a long-term holding horizon.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.