DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SMH vs VGT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of VanEck Semiconductor ETF and Vanguard Information Technology ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • SMHInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • VGTInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SMH has outpaced VGT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 89.54% total return against 35.97%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SMH has compounded at 34.11% a year, against 24.36% for VGT. VGT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.6% against 36.8% for SMH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Jan 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SMH50.26%89.54%55.67%35.49%34.11%19.34%36.8%1.091.54-35.7%
VGT26.00%35.97%31.57%19.20%24.36%15.02%24.6%0.941.34-27.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2004” measures every fund from January 30, 2004 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSMHVGT
Full nameVanEck Semiconductor ETFVanguard Information Technology ETF
IssuerVanEckVanguard
Last Close$569.77 as of August 19, 2026$119.79 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield0.19%0.46%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9393
Expense ratio0.35%0.09%
AUM$71.8B$151B
Distribution frequencyAnnualQuarterly
Underlying indexMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Indexa basket of Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings
ObjectiveTrack the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.Seeks to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Index/Information Technology 25/50, an index made up of stocks of large, mid-size, and small U.S. companies within the information technology sector, including technology software and services, hardware and equipment, and semiconductor manufacturers.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date12/20/201101/26/2004
Beta2.051.47
Last dividend$1.1050$0.1384
Ex-dividend date12/22/202506/24/2026

Bottom lineSMH and VGT are both for investors who want broad equity exposure — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Cost is: VGT charges 0.09% against 0.35% for SMH, and between two funds this similar that gap comes straight out of your return every year you hold.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs84
Total AUM$168B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SMH.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4703B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VGT.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VGT offers the higher yield at 0.46% vs 0.19% for SMH. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VGT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.09% compared to 0.35%.

They track different benchmarks: SMH is linked to MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index while VGT tracks a basket of Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings, which means their performance drivers differ.

VGT is the larger fund by assets ($151B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SMH would generate roughly $1.58/month, while VGT would produce $3.83/month, at current distribution rates.

SMH yield0.19%
VGT yield0.46%
Monthly diff on $10K$2.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SMH would cost approximately $350 in fees vs $90 for VGT (simplified, not compounded). The $260.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SMH ER0.35%
VGT ER0.09%

Strategy & risk

SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach, while VGT holds a basket of Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings. Beta is 2.05 for SMH and 1.47 for VGT, making VGT the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SMH beta2.05
VGT beta1.47

Fund details

SMH is managed by VanEck (launched 12/20/2011) with $71.8B in assets. VGT is managed by Vanguard (launched 01/26/2004) with $151B in assets.

SMH AUM$71.8B
VGT AUM$151B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for SMH and VGT?

SMH currently distributes 0.19% and VGT 0.46%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SMH or VGT better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. VGT currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SMH and VGT?

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) holds a basket of Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings. They are issued by VanEck and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both SMH and VGT?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SMH or VGT safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: SMH scores 93, VGT scores 93. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. VGT has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.47 vs 2.05 for SMH). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SMH or VGT?

SMH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VGT charges 0.09%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SMH vs VGT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SMH would generate roughly $1.58 per month ($19.00 annually). The same in VGT would produce about $3.83 per month ($46.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SMH or VGT?

SMH has outpaced VGT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 89.54% total return against 35.97%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SMH has compounded at 34.11% a year, against 24.36% for VGT. VGT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.6% against 36.8% for SMH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SMH vs VGT — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

SMH and VGT are both U.S. equity technology ETFs, but they carve up the sector differently. SMH tracks a narrow, 25-stock semiconductor index and weights heavily toward pure-play chip manufacturers—it's a concentrated bet on semiconductors alone. VGT casts a wider net across the entire information technology sector (software, services, hardware, and semiconductors) using a broader, market-cap-weighted approach that includes large, mid, and small-cap names.

How they differ

The biggest difference is scope: SMH isolates semiconductors in a 25-name index, while VGT holds the broader tech universe—software, cloud, semiconductor equipment, and consumer electronics alongside chip makers. This makes SMH roughly 2.7× more volatile (beta of 2.05 vs. 1.47 for VGT), reflecting its concentration in a single subsector.

VGT's expense ratio of 0.10% is less than a third of SMH's 0.35%, a meaningful cost advantage over decades of holding. VGT also trades at much larger scale, with $147B in AUM compared to SMH's $71.5B. On yield, VGT pays 0.45% quarterly while SMH distributes just 0.19% annually—neither fund prioritizes income, but VGT's more frequent distributions may appeal to those reinvesting regularly.

SMH's higher volatility and singular focus on semiconductors create concentrated exposure to chip cycle swings, equipment demand, and geopolitical supply-chain risks; VGT's diversification across software, services, and hardware cushions those swings.

Who each is best for

SMH: Fits investors with a higher risk tolerance who want to amplify exposure to semiconductor cyclicality and believe the industry will drive long-term tech growth, and who are comfortable accepting double the volatility of broad tech.

VGT: Designed for investors seeking diversified U.S. technology sector exposure without the concentration risk, willing to accept lower volatility, and preferring lower fees and quarterly income distributions.

Key risks to know

  • Sector rotation and chip cycle risk: SMH's extreme concentration in semiconductors exposes it to demand swings in memory, processors, and foundry services that can last years. A prolonged downturn in chip capex or a glut in memory pricing can drag SMH far more sharply than VGT, whose software and services holdings may hold up better.
  • Elevated volatility: SMH's beta of 2.05 means it tends to fall roughly twice as fast as the overall market during downturns. For investors with shorter time horizons or lower risk tolerance, this can translate to severe drawdowns that force emotional selling.
  • Geopolitical and supply-chain concentration: Semiconductors face unique risks around Taiwan tensions, China export restrictions, and equipment availability. VGT's broader tech mix includes software and services companies with less direct exposure to these supply-chain flashpoints.
  • Valuation compression in low-growth environments: Both funds hold growth-oriented tech, but SMH's narrower index concentrates that risk. If interest rates remain elevated or growth disappoints, chip multiples can compress faster than the broader tech sector.

Bottom line

If you want maximum exposure to semiconductor upside and can tolerate significant volatility, SMH's concentrated bet offers that leverage. If you prefer to diversify across the entire tech sector with lower fees and more moderate risk, VGT's broader approach and 0.10% expense ratio deliver that trade. Neither fund is designed for income, so the yield difference should not drive the choice. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.