DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SOXX vs VGT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares Semiconductor ETF and Vanguard Information Technology ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs34
Total AUM$303.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is known for offering a diverse range of exchange-traded funds with a particular strength in income-generating strategies. Their fund lineup spans core equity positions, covered call strategies, and dedicated income funds, with notable tickers including HDV (high dividend), ICSH (short-term corporate bonds), and TLTW (Treasury ladder with calls). The issuer maintains a focused portfolio of five ETFs that cater to investors seeking yield enhancement and income strategies across different asset classes and market segments.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SOXX.

ETFs48
Total AUM$11763.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that serve as core portfolio holdings for individual investors. Their fund lineup emphasizes core equity exposure and dividend income strategies, with offerings spanning domestic growth (VGT, VUG), broad market indices (VOO), dividend-focused portfolios (VYM, VIG), and international high dividend yield opportunities (VONG, VYMI). The issuer's seven funds are characterized by expense ratios among the industry's lowest and a focus on long-term, buy-and-hold investors seeking diversified equity exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VGT.

Side-by-side snapshot

SOXXVGT
Full nameiShares Semiconductor ETFVanguard Information Technology ETF
IssueriSharesVanguard
Last Close$495.87 as of May 20, 2026$112.13 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield0.37%0.33%
Expense ratio0.34%0.09%
AUM$29.6B$146.5B
Distribution frequencyQuarterly
Underlying indexBasket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings)
ObjectiveTracks the ICE Semiconductor Index of US-listed semiconductor companies.Seeks to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Index/Information Technology 25/50, an index made up of stocks of large, mid-size, and small U.S. companies within the information technology sector, including technology software and services, hardware and equipment, and semiconductor manufacturers.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date01/26/2004
Beta2.061.29
Last dividend$0.21$0.09
Ex-dividend date03/17/202603/24/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SOXX offers the higher yield at 0.37% vs 0.33% for VGT. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VGT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.09% compared to 0.34%.

VGT is the larger fund by assets ($146.5B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SOXX would generate roughly $3.08/month, while VGT would produce $2.75/month, at current distribution rates.

SOXX yield0.37%
VGT yield0.33%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.33

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SOXX would cost approximately $340 in fees vs $90 for VGT (simplified, not compounded). The $250.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SOXX ER0.34%
VGT ER0.09%

Strategy & risk

SOXX tracks — with a basket approach, while VGT tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings) using a basket strategy. Beta is 2.06 for SOXX and 1.29 for VGT, indicating VGT is less volatile relative to the market.

SOXX beta2.06
VGT beta1.29

Fund details

SOXX is managed by iShares (launched —) with $29.6B in assets. VGT is managed by Vanguard (launched 01/26/2004) with $146.5B in assets.

SOXX AUM$29.6B
VGT AUM$146.5B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is SOXX or VGT better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SOXX currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SOXX and VGT?

SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) tracks — with a basket strategy, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) tracks Basket (Vanguard Information Technology ETF holdings) with a basket approach. They are issued by iShares and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both SOXX and VGT?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, SOXX or VGT?

SOXX has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VGT charges 0.09%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SOXX vs VGT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SOXX would generate roughly $3.08 per month ($37.00 annually). The same in VGT would produce about $2.75 per month ($33.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

SOXX vs VGT — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

SOXX and VGT are both technology-focused ETFs, but they target different slices of the sector. SOXX is a pure-play semiconductor tracker holding only chipmakers, while VGT is a broad information technology fund covering semiconductors, software, services, and hardware. VGT is also five times larger by assets under management and carries a significantly lower expense ratio.

How they differ

The biggest difference is scope: SOXX narrows to semiconductor manufacturers only (via the ICE Semiconductor Index), while VGT casts a wider net across all U.S. information technology subsectors (software, services, equipment, semiconductors) using the MSCI US Investable Market IT index. This makes SOXX a concentrated, higher-beta play—its beta of 1.65 versus VGT's 1.18 reflects that volatility amplification.

On costs, VGT's 0.09% expense ratio crushes SOXX's 0.34%, a meaningful 25-basis-point gap that compounds over years. Dividend yields are similar and modest (0.46% vs. 0.38%), reflecting the tech sector's reinvestment-focused character. VGT is also vastly larger, with $121 billion in AUM compared to SOXX's $20 billion, which typically translates to tighter spreads and better liquidity in secondary trading.

Risk profile differs too. SOXX's 52-week range ($160–$407) shows sharper drawdowns than VGT's ($485–$807), consistent with its concentrated-sector and higher-beta nature. VGT's diversification across IT subsectors offers a smoother ride.

Who each is best for

  • SOXX: Investors with higher risk tolerance who want concentrated semiconductor exposure and believe the chip cycle will outperform broader tech; best suited for longer holding periods given volatility, and ideally tax-advantaged accounts to defer dividend taxes.
  • VGT: Long-term buy-and-hold tech investors seeking diversified IT exposure at minimal cost; works well in any account type but especially valuable in taxable accounts due to the low expense ratio, and suitable for moderate risk tolerance.

Key risks to know

  • Concentration risk (SOXX): Single-sector exposure means downturns in semiconductors—cyclicality, fab capacity swings, geopolitical supply disruption—hit much harder than in a broader tech fund.
  • Valuation sensitivity (both): Tech stocks are sensitive to interest-rate expectations; rising rates can pressure valuations faster than in less-growth-heavy sectors.
  • Beta amplification (SOXX): The 1.65 beta means SOXX swings 65% more than the broad market, which can lead to outsized losses in downturns.
  • Sector rotation risk (both): Long periods of tech underperformance relative to financials, healthcare, or industrials would hurt both equally, but SOXX more acutely due to its narrower mandate.

Bottom line

If you want broad, low-cost technology exposure with a smooth ride, VGT's superior size, 25-basis-point fee advantage, and lower beta make it the natural default. If you're specifically bullish on semiconductors and can tolerate higher volatility, SOXX offers concentrated upside—but you're paying for that concentration in fees and drawdown risk. Past performance doesn't predict future results; either fund's returns depend on tech sector trends and valuations going forward.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.