DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SPYI vs VT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs19
Total AUM$30.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4488B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that emphasize broad market exposure and long-term investing. The company operates 175 ETFs across diverse fund families including Index, Bond, Equity, Dividend, Income, International, Factor, and ESG strategies, serving investors with various goals from core portfolio building to specialized income generation. Notable for its scale and popular tickers like VB (total U.S. small-cap), BND (total bond market), and VBIAX (international bonds), Vanguard focuses on providing comprehensive, index-based investment solutions with an emphasis on cost efficiency and accessibility.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VT.

Side-by-side snapshot

SPYIVT
Full nameNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETFVanguard Total World Stock ETF
IssuerNEOSVanguard
Last Close$53.01 as of July 21, 2026$154.29 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield12.02%1.46%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9093
Expense ratio0.68%0.07%
AUM$10.7B$77.7B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
Underlying indexS&P 500 IndexFTSE Global All Cap Index
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.Track the FTSE Global All Cap Index, covering developed and emerging markets.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date08/29/202206/24/2008
Beta0.70.98
Last dividend$0.5310$0.5630
Ex-dividend date06/16/202606/18/2026

Bottom lineChoose SPYI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 12.02%, generated by selling options premium. Choose VT if you want broad equity exposure. There's no free lunch: SPYI's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while VT keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SPYI has lagged VT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.92% total return against 20.59%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: VT has compounded at 18.13% a year, against 14.81% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3YSince Aug 2022Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SPYI7.07%16.92%14.81%14.88%12.6%0.751.06-16.5%
VT9.23%20.59%18.13%17.87%14.5%0.851.22-16.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Aug 2022” measures every fund from August 30, 2022 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 12.02% vs 1.46% for VT. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.07% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: SPYI is linked to S&P 500 Index while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VT is the larger fund by assets ($77.7B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose SPYI

NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — SPYI distributes roughly 12.02% from selling options premium, vs 1.46% for VT.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.7 vs 1.0 for VT.

Choose VT

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.07% expense ratio vs 0.68% for SPYI.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SPYI would generate roughly $100.17/month, while VT would produce $12.17/month, at current distribution rates.

SPYI yield12.02%
VT yield1.46%
Monthly diff on $10K$88.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SPYI would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $70 for VT (simplified, not compounded). The $610.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SPYI ER0.68%
VT ER0.07%

Strategy & risk

SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index with an international approach. Beta is 0.7 for SPYI and 0.98 for VT, indicating SPYI is less volatile relative to the market.

SPYI beta0.7
VT beta0.98

Fund details

SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $10.7B in assets. VT is managed by Vanguard (launched 06/24/2008) with $77.7B in assets.

SPYI AUM$10.7B
VT AUM$77.7B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is SPYI or VT better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SPYI and VT?

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index with an international approach. They are issued by NEOS and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both SPYI and VT?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, SPYI or VT?

SPYI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VT charges 0.07%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SPYI vs VT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SPYI would generate roughly $100.17 per month ($1,202.00 annually). The same in VT would produce about $12.17 per month ($146.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SPYI or VT?

SPYI has lagged VT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.92% total return against 20.59%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: VT has compounded at 18.13% a year, against 14.81% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SPYI vs VT — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

SPYI is a single-asset S&P 500 ETF engineered to generate high monthly income through a covered-call options overlay, currently yielding 11.87% annually. VT is a low-cost global equity ETF tracking developed and emerging markets across all continents, with a modest 1.43% yield paid quarterly. The core distinction: SPYI prioritizes income extraction from a concentrated U.S. equity bet using derivatives, while VT provides broad diversification and capital appreciation with minimal income.

How they differ

The most fundamental difference is strategy. SPYI applies systematic covered-call writing to S&P 500 holdings to generate monthly cash distributions—a synthetic income approach that caps upside in exchange for steady payouts. VT holds a market-cap-weighted portfolio of 9,000+ stocks spanning U.S., developed international, and emerging markets, designed to track total global equity returns with no income enhancement.

Income yield illustrates the tradeoff starkly: SPYI distributes 11.87% annually versus VT's 1.43%, a gap funded largely by options premium rather than underlying dividend growth. The cost structure mirrors their philosophies—SPYI charges 0.68% to manage the overlay, while VT's 0.07% reflects Vanguard's indexing efficiency. Beta reveals another layer: SPYI's 0.7 beta signals its call-selling dampens market upswings, whereas VT's 0.98 beta tracks broad market movements nearly one-to-one. AUM and longevity differ too—VT is a $74.1B established fund (since 2008), while SPYI is a newer $10.5B derivative vehicle (since 2022).

Who each is best for

  • SPYI: Fits investors who seek monthly income from equity exposure, tolerate capped capital gains, and want to reduce taxes via return-of-capital distributions rather than collect bond yields or dividend-focused stocks.
  • VT: Designed for investors building long-term wealth through global diversification, with low fees and a hands-off approach, who view income as incidental to total return and accept quarterly (or minimal) distributions.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yield. SPYI's 11.87% distribution rate substantially exceeds the historical equity risk premium, meaning the fund likely relies on return-of-capital treatment and will erode NAV over time unless underlying S&P 500 capital gains offset the payout.
  • Capped upside from call overlay. Systematic covered-call writing means SPYI will underperform in strong bull markets; the 0.7 beta reflects real opportunity cost when the market rallies sharply.
  • Single-asset concentration risk. SPYI's exclusive S&P 500 exposure leaves no buffer against U.S. equity downturns, sector rotations, or deteriorating fundamentals in large-cap domestic stocks.
  • Currency and emerging-market risk in VT. Geographic and currency diversification benefits VT in some scenarios but also exposes it to emerging-market political instability, currency swings, and developed-market regional slowdowns.
  • Call-assignment and tax timing unpredictability. SPYI's options activity may force share sales and realizations; the tax-efficient labeling doesn't eliminate surprise capital events or changes in return-of-capital percentages.

Bottom line

SPYI caters to income-focused investors willing to forgo capital appreciation upside in exchange for elevated monthly distributions supported by options premium; VT suits wealth accumulators seeking global diversification with minimal fees and no expectation of meaningful distributions. If you prioritize yield and can accept capped gains in a concentrated U.S. portfolio, SPYI offers a different income profile than traditional dividend stocks—but if you want a core long-term holding capturing worldwide equity growth, VT's simplicity and cost efficiency stand apart. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.