DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SPYI vs VT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 25, 2026

Best for

  • SPYIInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 12.18%, generated by selling options premium.
  • VTInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SPYI has lagged VT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 17.47% total return against 21.97%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: VT has compounded at 21.26% a year, against 16.95% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3YSince Aug 2022Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SPYI10.02%17.47%16.95%15.29%12.6%0.901.27-16.5%
VT13.34%21.97%21.26%18.50%14.5%1.031.49-16.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 24, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Aug 2022” measures every fund from August 30, 2022 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSPYIVT
Full nameNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETFVanguard Total World Stock ETF
IssuerNEOSVanguard
Underlying indexS&P 500 IndexFTSE Global All Cap Index
Last Close$53.39 as of August 25, 2026$160.10 as of August 25, 2026
Distribution yield12.18%1.41%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9096
Expense ratio0.68%0.06%
AUM$11.6B$81.2B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.Track the FTSE Global All Cap Index, covering developed and emerging markets.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date08/29/202206/24/2008
Beta0.70.98
Last dividend$0.5420$0.5630
Ex-dividend date08/19/202606/18/2026

Bottom lineChoose SPYI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 12.18%, generated by selling options premium. Choose VT if you want broad equity exposure. There's no free lunch: SPYI's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while VT keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. SPYI generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs19
Total AUM$32.6B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4670B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VT.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 12.18% vs 1.41% for VT. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.06% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: SPYI is linked to S&P 500 Index while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VT is the larger fund by assets ($81.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose SPYI

NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — SPYI distributes roughly 12.18% from selling options premium, vs 1.41% for VT.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.7 vs 1.0 for VT.

Choose VT

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.06% expense ratio vs 0.68% for SPYI.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SPYI would generate roughly $101.50/month, while VT would produce $11.75/month, at current distribution rates.

SPYI yield12.18%
VT yield1.41%
Monthly diff on $10K$89.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SPYI would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $60 for VT (simplified, not compounded). The $620.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SPYI ER0.68%
VT ER0.06%

Strategy & risk

SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index with an international approach. Beta is 0.7 for SPYI and 0.98 for VT, making SPYI the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SPYI beta0.7
VT beta0.98

Fund details

SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $11.6B in assets. VT is managed by Vanguard (launched 06/24/2008) with $81.2B in assets.

SPYI AUM$11.6B
VT AUM$81.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for SPYI and VT?

SPYI currently distributes 12.18% and VT 1.41%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SPYI or VT better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SPYI and VT?

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index with an international approach. They are issued by NEOS and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both SPYI and VT?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SPYI or VT safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — VT scores 96, SPYI scores 90, so VT's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. SPYI has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.70 vs 0.98 for VT). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, SPYI or VT?

SPYI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VT charges 0.06%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SPYI vs VT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SPYI would generate roughly $101.50 per month ($1,218.00 annually). The same in VT would produce about $11.75 per month ($141.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SPYI or VT?

SPYI has lagged VT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 17.47% total return against 21.97%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: VT has compounded at 21.26% a year, against 16.95% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SPYI vs VT — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

SPYI is an options-overlay ETF that tracks the S&P 500 while selling call options to generate high monthly income; VT is a broad global equity ETF covering roughly 9,000 stocks across developed and emerging markets. The core difference is strategy: SPYI chases yield through derivative income on a concentrated domestic index, while VT aims for total-market exposure with minimal fees and modest dividends. They serve fundamentally different investor goals.

How they differ

SPYI's 11.69% distribution rate dwarfs VT's 1.39% because SPYI systematically sells covered calls against its S&P 500 holdings, capturing option premium as monthly income. That high yield comes with a tradeoff: the call writing caps upside potential and introduces NAV erosion risk if the fund pays out more than underlying performance supports. VT, by contrast, distributes only the dividends embedded in its global stock holdings—quarterly, not monthly—and carries a trivial 0.07% expense ratio versus SPYI's 0.68%. SPYI's beta of 0.7 signals its call-selling strategy dampens market moves relative to the S&P 500 itself, while VT's 0.98 beta tracks the global market nearly one-to-one.

Who each is best for

SPYI: Fits investors seeking regular monthly cash flow from a U.S. equity core and willing to trade capital appreciation potential for high current income, particularly those focused on consistent distribution discipline over multi-year growth.

VT: Designed for long-term accumulators wanting true global diversification with minimal fees and no yield-chasing mechanics, suitable for portfolios prioritizing compounding and broad geographic and sector exposure over income.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at 11.69% yield. SPYI's distribution rate far exceeds the historical dividend yield of the S&P 500 (roughly 1.5–2%). The gap must be filled by call premium, return of capital, or NAV decay. If equity markets rise sharply, called-away shares will cap participation; if they fall, NAV will erode faster than the market itself.
  • Call-writing opportunity cost. By capping gains through systematic call sales, SPYI forgoes significant upside in strong bull markets. A 30% S&P 500 rally would likely trigger assignment of most calls, locking in gains well below the index's move.
  • Concentration in U.S. large-cap. SPYI's S&P 500 exposure excludes mid- and small-cap U.S. stocks and all international equity; VT's 9,000-stock basket spreads risk across geographies and market caps. If U.S. large-cap underperforms emerging markets or small-caps, SPYI's performance gap will widen.
  • Beta mismatch for bond-hedging strategies. SPYI's 0.7 beta makes it a partial market hedge, which may not align with portfolios seeking full equity exposure or synthetic-bond-replacement income.

Bottom line

If your priority is monthly income and you're comfortable with capped upside in exchange for high current yield, SPYI's call-overlay strategy generates distributions most dividend stocks cannot. If you want broad global equity exposure with rock-bottom costs and compounding-friendly income, VT's simplicity and 80+ year track record of indexing fit a different goal entirely. Past performance does not predict future results, and option-overlay mechanics can behave unexpectedly in volatile or sharply rising markets.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.