DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SPYI vs VT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs19
Total AUM$25.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for specializing in income-focused ETFs that employ option strategies and enhanced yield mechanisms across equities, fixed income, and alternative assets. The firm operates 19 funds organized around themes including covered call strategies (such as QQQH, SPYH, and QQQI), high-income equity products, hedged equity income, and enhanced fixed income solutions, with notable tickers covering broad market indices and technology-heavy benchmarks. NEOS distinguishes itself through a niche focus on yield enhancement and income generation across diverse asset classes, catering to investors seeking above-market distributions through systematic option writing and alternative income strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

ETFs48
Total AUM$11763.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that serve as core portfolio holdings for individual investors. Their fund lineup emphasizes core equity exposure and dividend income strategies, with offerings spanning domestic growth (VGT, VUG), broad market indices (VOO), dividend-focused portfolios (VYM, VIG), and international high dividend yield opportunities (VONG, VYMI). The issuer's seven funds are characterized by expense ratios among the industry's lowest and a focus on long-term, buy-and-hold investors seeking diversified equity exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VT.

Side-by-side snapshot

SPYIVT
Full nameNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETFVanguard Total World Stock ETF
IssuerNEOSVanguard
Last Close$53.54 as of May 20, 2026$153.71 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield11.73%1.40%
Expense ratio0.68%0.06%
AUM$9.2B$89.9B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
Underlying indexS&P 500 IndexFTSE Global All Cap Index
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.Track the FTSE Global All Cap Index, covering developed and emerging markets.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date08/29/202206/24/2008
Beta0.690.98
Last dividend$0.53$0.33
Ex-dividend date04/22/202603/20/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 11.73% vs 1.40% for VT. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.06% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: SPYI is linked to S&P 500 Index while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VT is the larger fund by assets ($89.9B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SPYI would generate roughly $97.75/month, while VT would produce $11.67/month, at current distribution rates.

SPYI yield11.73%
VT yield1.40%
Monthly diff on $10K$86.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SPYI would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $60 for VT (simplified, not compounded). The $620.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SPYI ER0.68%
VT ER0.06%

Strategy & risk

SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index using an international strategy. Beta is 0.69 for SPYI and 0.98 for VT, indicating SPYI is less volatile relative to the market.

SPYI beta0.69
VT beta0.98

Fund details

SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $9.2B in assets. VT is managed by Vanguard (launched 06/24/2008) with $89.9B in assets.

SPYI AUM$9.2B
VT AUM$89.9B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is SPYI or VT better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SPYI and VT?

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options strategy, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index with an international approach. They are issued by NEOS and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both SPYI and VT?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, SPYI or VT?

SPYI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VT charges 0.06%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SPYI vs VT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SPYI would generate roughly $97.75 per month ($1,173.00 annually). The same in VT would produce about $11.67 per month ($140.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

SPYI vs VT — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

SPYI and VT are both equity index ETFs, but they pursue fundamentally different strategies. SPYI tracks the S&P 500 using an options overlay to generate high monthly income, while VT is a broad global equity fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index with minimal income generation. The choice between them hinges on whether you prioritize domestic high yield or diversified global exposure.

How they differ

The core distinction is strategy: SPYI uses call option sales against S&P 500 holdings to generate its 12.24% distribution rate, while VT offers a 1.44% yield from ordinary dividends on a globally diversified portfolio. This matters because SPYI's monthly payouts come partly from return of capital (its SEC 30-day yield of 0.58% is far below its distribution rate), whereas VT's distributions are genuine dividend income. Second, SPYI concentrates 100% in U.S. large-cap stocks versus VT's exposure to 50+ countries across developed and emerging markets—SPYI's beta of 0.69 reflects its reduced price sensitivity through the options strategy, while VT's beta of 0.99 tracks the market. Third, the fee and scale gap is striking: VT charges 0.06% on $79 billion in AUM, while SPYI's 0.68% fee covers active options management on $8.1 billion.

Who each is best for

SPYI: Investors seeking monthly income from a U.S. equity core, comfortable with capped upside from the call overlay, and able to hold in tax-advantaged accounts to defer the tax complications of monthly distributions and potential return-of-capital treatment.

VT: Long-term buy-and-hold investors wanting simple global diversification, low costs, and exposure to both developed and emerging markets, with minimal income needs and a preference for quarterly, tax-efficient distributions.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion and return of capital. SPYI's 12.24% distribution rate far exceeds the 0.58% SEC yield, indicating significant distributions come from principal or capital gains. Over multi-year periods, this structure may erode NAV if equity returns don't keep pace.
  • Capped upside from the call overlay. SPYI sells calls to fund distributions, which limits share price appreciation in rallying markets. If the S&P 500 outperforms significantly, SPYI holders forgo those gains.
  • Single-country concentration. SPYI's U.S.-only exposure leaves it vulnerable to domestic economic shocks or geopolitical shifts that don't affect emerging or developed international markets.
  • Emerging market currency and geopolitical risk (VT). Nearly half of VT's portfolio sits outside the U.S., exposing it to currency fluctuations and political instability in developing nations.
  • Fees relative to yield (SPYI). The 0.68% expense ratio consumes most or all of the 0.58% SEC yield, meaning ongoing costs are substantial relative to the actual yield.

Bottom line

If you need high current income and are comfortable with capped upside and complexity, SPYI delivers monthly payouts backed by options strategy—but hold it tax-sheltered and monitor NAV closely. If you prioritize global diversification, simplicity, and low cost over income, VT is the cleaner choice. Neither is inherently superior; the fit depends on your income requirements and geographic preferences.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.