DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SPYI vs XDTE: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs19
Total AUM$25.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for specializing in income-focused ETFs that employ option strategies and enhanced yield mechanisms across equities, fixed income, and alternative assets. The firm operates 19 funds organized around themes including covered call strategies (such as QQQH, SPYH, and QQQI), high-income equity products, hedged equity income, and enhanced fixed income solutions, with notable tickers covering broad market indices and technology-heavy benchmarks. NEOS distinguishes itself through a niche focus on yield enhancement and income generation across diverse asset classes, catering to investors seeking above-market distributions through systematic option writing and alternative income strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

ETFs41
Total AUM$10.6B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for creating thematic and income-focused ETFs that often incorporate covered call strategies and weekly distribution mechanisms. The firm operates 38 funds across four main families—Core, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with popular tickers like MAGC, MAGS, and MAGY in their income lineup, plus numerous weekly call writing products (AAPW, AMDW, MSFW, and others) tied to major technology and commodity names. The issuer specializes in niche strategies designed to generate frequent income distributions while providing targeted sector or individual stock exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XDTE.

Side-by-side snapshot

SPYIXDTE
Full nameNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETFRoundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call
IssuerNEOSRoundhill Investments
Last Close$53.54 as of May 20, 2026$39.52 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield11.73%20.92%
Expense ratio0.68%0.97%
AUM$9.2B$288M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
Underlying indexS&P 500 IndexSPX
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date08/29/202208/15/2024
Beta0.69
Last dividend$0.53$0.16
Ex-dividend date04/22/202605/14/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) and XDTE (Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XDTE offers the higher yield at 20.92% vs 11.73% for SPYI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SPYI is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.68% compared to 0.97%.

They track different benchmarks: SPYI is linked to S&P 500 Index while XDTE tracks SPX, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPYI is the larger fund by assets ($9.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SPYI would generate roughly $97.75/month, while XDTE would produce $174.33/month, at current distribution rates.

SPYI yield11.73%
XDTE yield20.92%
Monthly diff on $10K$76.58

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SPYI would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $970 for XDTE (simplified, not compounded). The $290.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SPYI ER0.68%
XDTE ER0.97%

Strategy & risk

SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach, while XDTE tracks SPX using a covered call strategy.

SPYI beta0.69
XDTE beta

Fund details

SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $9.2B in assets. XDTE is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 08/15/2024) with $288M in assets.

SPYI AUM$9.2B
XDTE AUM$288M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is SPYI or XDTE better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XDTE currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SPYI and XDTE?

SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options strategy, while XDTE (Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call) tracks SPX with a covered call approach. They are issued by NEOS and Roundhill Investments respectively.

Can I hold both SPYI and XDTE?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, SPYI or XDTE?

SPYI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while XDTE charges 0.97%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SPYI vs XDTE generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SPYI would generate roughly $97.75 per month ($1,173.00 annually). The same in XDTE would produce about $174.33 per month ($2,092.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

SPYI vs XDTE — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

Both SPYI and XDTE track the S&P 500 through options overlays, but they deploy them very differently. SPYI uses a monthly income strategy that pairs S&P 500 exposure with options to generate a 12.24% distribution rate; XDTE runs a weekly 0DTE (zero days to expiration) covered call strategy that yields 18.24%. The core distinction: SPYI targets moderate income with equity participation, while XDTE prioritizes maximum current yield through constant, short-dated call selling.

How they differ

XDTE's strategy is the sharpest differentiator. It sells 0DTE calls on the S&P 500 index every single week—meaning the calls expire worthless (hopefully) within days, then the cycle repeats. SPYI uses a less aggressive monthly overlay, giving more room for equity upside. That difference shows in yields: XDTE distributes 18.24% annually versus SPYI's 12.24%, but XDTE's beta is reported as 0.0, suggesting its call selling clips most market participation. SPYI's 0.69 beta indicates it retains meaningful S&P 500 movement.

Fee-wise, SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio beats XDTE's 0.97%, though XDTE's smaller $294M AUM versus SPYI's $8.1B may eventually pressure cost efficiency. SPYI has been running since August 2022, giving it three-plus years of history; XDTE arrived in August 2024, so it's still in its first full earnings cycle. Distribution frequency matters too: SPYI pays monthly (easier to track), XDTE weekly (more reinvestment friction for taxable accounts).

Who each is best for

SPYI: Investors seeking high monthly income with meaningful equity upside, particularly those comfortable holding in tax-advantaged accounts where the monthly distributions won't create trading friction.

XDTE: Traders and yield-chasers willing to accept near-zero market beta in exchange for maximum current payout; best suited for those who can handle weekly distributions and understand that call capping eliminates outsized gains.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion. Both funds carry yields well above 10%, raising the question whether returns can sustain distributions. XDTE's 18.24% rate is especially high; if equity returns disappoint or call premiums compress, NAV may contract over time.
  • Call assignment and capping. XDTE's 0DTE strategy means calls are nearly always in-the-money near expiration. If the S&P 500 rallies sharply, upside gets capped weekly. SPYI's monthly cadence offers more breathing room but still limits gains on strong market days.
  • Options volatility dependency. Both funds rely on options premiums to generate income. In low-volatility environments, option prices fall, squeezing distributions. Conversely, sharp selloffs can force large mark-to-market losses even if the underlying index recovers.
  • Limited track record for XDTE. With only 18 months of history, XDTE hasn't been tested through a full market cycle or serious drawdown. Claims about sustainability are tentative.

Bottom line

If you want meaningful S&P 500 exposure plus a healthy monthly income stream, SPYI's 12.24% yield and 0.69 beta suggest a cleaner tradeoff between yield and participation. If maximum current income is your sole priority and you've accepted that you'll forgo outsized rallies, XDTE's 18.24% payout is more aggressive—but the 0DTE structure is untested through a serious downturn, and the higher fee eats into returns. Past performance doesn't predict future results, and both strategies depend on options premiums that can shift with market conditions.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.