DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

VIS vs XLI: Vanguard Industrials, or the Sector SPDR?

A head-to-head of Vanguard Industrials and Industrial Select Sector SPDR covering construction and cost.

Updated October 16, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • VISInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • XLIInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

VIS has lagged XLI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 10.24% total return against 11.92%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: XLI has compounded at 13.25% a year, against 13.08% for VIS. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Sep 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
VIS8.15%10.24%19.02%11.59%13.08%10.56%17.7%0.751.10-20.8%
XLI9.01%11.92%19.37%11.93%13.25%10.49%16.7%0.811.19-18.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Sep 2004” measures every fund from September 29, 2004 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricVISXLI
Full nameVanguard Industrials ETFState Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF
IssuerVanguardState Street
Underlying indexMSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 IndexIndustrial Select Sector Index
Last Close$320.51 as of October 16, 2026$167.76 as of October 16, 2026
Distribution rate0.88%1.08%
Trailing 12-month yield0.96%1.12%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9692
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.84%0.99%
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
AUM$8.02B$30.5B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
ObjectiveTracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date09/23/200412/16/1998
Beta1.121.01
Last dividend$0.702$0.455
Ex-dividend date09/23/202609/21/2026

Bottom lineVIS and XLI are both for investors who want broad equity exposure — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Fees and payouts are close too, so it comes down to which your broker offers commission-free and any share-price or tax-lot preference.

Two US industrials sector books

Both hold US industrials. Index construction and cost decide whether a second fund adds anything.

VISXLI
SectorUS industrialsUS industrials
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Fund size$8.02B$30.5B

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4.66T

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VIS.

ETFs186
Total AUM$2.15T

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XLI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XLI offers the higher yield at 1.08% vs 0.88% for VIS. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

XLI is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.08% compared to 0.09%.

They have different reference exposures: VIS is linked to MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index while XLI is linked to Industrial Select Sector Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

XLI is the larger fund by assets ($30.5B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, VIS would generate roughly $22.00 cash per distribution, while XLI would produce $27.00 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

VIS yield0.88%
XLI yield1.08%
Cash diff on $10K$5.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, VIS would cost approximately $90 in fees vs $80 for XLI (simplified, not compounded). The $10.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

VIS ER0.09%
XLI ER0.08%

Strategy & risk

VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index with an index approach. Beta is 1.12 for VIS and 1.01 for XLI, making XLI the less volatile of the two by this measure.

VIS beta1.12
XLI beta1.01

Fund details

VIS is managed by Vanguard (launched 09/23/2004) with $8.02B in assets. XLI is managed by State Street (launched 12/16/1998) with $30.5B in assets.

VIS AUM$8.02B
XLI AUM$30.5B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between VIS and XLI?

VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) both hold US industrials. Index and breadth differ. Cost is 0.09% versus 0.08%; size is $8.02B versus $30.5B. Distributions are 0.88% and 1.08% as of October 2026.

What is the current distribution rate for VIS and XLI?

VIS currently distributes 0.88% and XLI 1.08%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is VIS or XLI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XLI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both VIS and XLI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is VIS or XLI safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — VIS scores 96, XLI scores 92, so VIS's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, VIS or XLI?

VIS has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XLI charges 0.08%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in VIS vs XLI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in VIS would generate roughly $22.00 cash per distribution ($88.00 annually). The same in XLI would produce about $27.00 cash per distribution ($108.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, VIS or XLI?

VIS has lagged XLI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 10.24% total return against 11.92%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: XLI has compounded at 13.25% a year, against 13.08% for VIS. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

VIS vs XLI — at a glance

Generated October 17, 2026.

Overview

VIS and XLI both track industrials exposure through large-cap U.S. stock indexes, but they differ materially in scope and index construction. The two ETFs are issued by Vanguard and State Street respectively and have held industrials mandates for two decades or more.

How they differ

The biggest difference is index coverage. XLI draws only from the S&P 500, while VIS pulls from the broader MSCI US Investable Market, which encompasses large-, mid-, and small-cap industrials. That structural choice means XLI will hold fewer positions and concentrate more weight in the largest industrial firms; VIS will have wider industry and market-cap reach.

Second, VIS carries a higher beta of 1.12 versus 1.01 for XLI, a reflection of its smaller-cap tilt.

Third, XLI is cheaper on expense ratio at 0.08% versus 0.09%, though the difference is negligible (0.01%). XLI is also substantially larger by assets, with $30.5B under management against $8.02B for VIS.

Who each is best for

  • VIS: Investors seeking a broad, market-cap-weighted basket of industrials firms across the capitalization spectrum, including mid and small-cap exposure alongside large-cap names. Fits allocators who want industrials but don't want to be overweight mega-cap winners.
  • XLI: Investors who want industrials exposure anchored to the S&P 500's largest industrial constituents. Designed for core equity allocators building from the index's largest, most-traded stocks, or those seeking exposure concentrated in a flagship benchmark's sector selection.

Key risks to know

  • Index composition: VIS and XLI may hold overlapping positions in large-cap industrials, but VIS's mid- and small-cap holdings will likely differ from XLI's S&P 500-only roster. Verifying actual position overlap is important if considering both funds.
  • Beta divergence: VIS's higher beta of 1.12 versus 1.01 means it will amplify industrials sector moves more sharply in both directions. In a downturn, VIS may fall further than XLI; in rallies, the reverse applies.
  • Sector concentration: Both indexes isolate industrials as a single sector. If industrials underperform or face prolonged headwinds—supply-chain stress, commodity cycles, capital intensity—the sector tilt will magnify losses relative to a broad market index.

Bottom line

If you want broad industrials exposure across the full market-cap spectrum, VIS's structure supports that; if you prefer to stay within S&P 500 industrials with lower cost and larger assets under management, XLI's design accommodates that choice. The yield difference is modest and the expense ratio gap immaterial. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.