Generated July 2026 from current fund data.
Overview
VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index, holding all 500 of the largest U.S. companies with equal methodology across sectors and market caps. VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, tilting toward companies with higher expected earnings growth and excluding value-oriented equities. The core distinction: VOO is market-weight blend; VUG is a growth-filtered subset of large caps.
How they differ
VOO holds the entire S&P 500, while VUG excludes value stocks and overweights growth names—meaning VUG's 1.24 beta versus VOO's 1.0 reflects higher sensitivity to market swings and a tilt toward technology, healthcare, and other growth sectors. That growth tilt shows up in yield too: VOO distributes 1.15%, while VUG yields only 0.43%, because growth stocks typically pay smaller dividends. Both charge minimal fees (VOO at 0.03%, VUG at 0.04%), but VOO's $1033B in assets makes it one of the largest ETFs ever; VUG's $222B is still substantial but more specialized.
Who each is best for
VOO: Fits investors seeking core large-cap U.S. equity exposure with minimal cost and maximum diversification across the entire S&P 500, including both growth and value names.
VUG: Fits investors with a conviction that U.S. large-cap growth will outperform the broader market and who are comfortable with higher volatility and lower current income in pursuit of capital appreciation.
Key risks to know
- Sector concentration in VUG: Growth stocks are clustered in technology and healthcare; a downturn in those sectors will hit VUG harder than VOO's diversified holdings.
- Higher beta volatility in VUG: A 1.24 beta means VUG typically swings 24% more than the broader market in both directions; investors with lower risk tolerance may experience larger drawdowns during corrections.
- Growth-to-value rotation risk: VUG structurally avoids value stocks; if value outperforms growth over an extended period, VUG will lag VOO by design, not because of manager skill but because of the index's construction.
- Lower income sustainability in VUG: The 0.43% yield reflects the growth strategy, meaning far less cash return; investors relying on distributions will find little income from VUG holdings.
Bottom line
If you want broad S&P 500 exposure at rock-bottom cost with steady dividend income, VOO's blend and 1.15% yield stand out; if you're willing to accept higher volatility for growth-oriented positioning, VUG's tilt offers concentrated exposure to the sectors driving recent market performance. Neither approach is inherently wrong—the choice hinges on whether you prefer market-weight diversity or a deliberate growth tilt, and whether lower distributions in VUG align with your income goals. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.