Generated August 15, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
VOO and VYM are both Vanguard large-cap equity ETFs, but they track different indexes with markedly different objectives. VOO replicates the broad S&P 500 Index across 500 companies; VYM follows the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which screens for dividend-paying stocks with value characteristics. The result is a fundamental difference in yield, risk profile, and market exposure.
How they differ
VOO holds the full S&P 500 and delivers a 1.10% distribution rate, while VYM's narrower focus on high-dividend payers yields 2.35%—more than double. The biggest practical difference is portfolio composition: VOO captures all 500 large-cap stocks with no income preference, while VYM weights toward mature, cash-generative businesses that tend to trade at lower valuations. VOO's beta is 1.0 (by design), reflecting broad market movement; VYM's beta of 0.68 indicates lower volatility relative to the market, a common trait of dividend-focused equity portfolios. Both charge minimal fees—VOO at 0.03% and VYM at 0.06%—but VOO's much larger asset base ($1032B versus $83.4B) means fractionally tighter spreads and deeper liquidity.
Who each is best for
VOO: Fits investors seeking maximum U.S. market breadth with minimal costs and who are indifferent to yield—those building a core equity allocation or pursuing total-return investing where dividends are a byproduct, not the goal.
VYM: Fits investors who want higher current income from U.S. equities and have some tolerance for value-stock characteristics; designed for portfolios emphasizing quarterly cash generation alongside long-term capital appreciation.
Key risks to know
- Concentration in dividend payers. VYM's index screens for high-dividend stocks, concentrating the fund in sectors and business models (utilities, REITs, energy, financials) that pay large distributions. VOO's broader composition diversifies across growth and non-dividend-paying sectors, reducing sector concentration risk.
- Value style risk. VYM's FTSE methodology incorporates value characteristics; when growth stocks and mega-cap tech outperform, VYM lags. VOO's market-cap-weighted structure automatically reflects what the market values most, so it captures outperformance from trend shifts without active style tilts. Over multi-year stretches, this gap can be material.
- Lower volatility as a hidden headwind. VYM's beta of 0.68 means it swings less than the market during rallies; investors who need market-level returns may underperform during strong bull markets if they weight VYM heavily. VOO's beta-1.0 matching ensures you get what the market delivers, up and down.
- Dividend sustainability in downturns. High-dividend stocks can cut payouts during recessions (energy and financials are historical examples). VYM's higher yield assumes those payouts persist; VOO's lower yield has less exposed to distribution cuts.
Bottom line
VOO is the simpler choice for investors who want the market as it is—all 500 stocks, all sectors, minimal cost. VYM makes sense if you value current income and can accept value-stock tilts and sector concentration as the trade-off for a 2.35% yield. Past performance does not predict future results, and dividend sustainability or style rotation can reshape returns meaningfully over time.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.