Generated August 15, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
VTV and VYM are large-cap U.S. equity ETFs from Vanguard that both tilt toward value stocks but use different selection criteria. VTV tracks the broad CRSP US Large Cap Value Index and targets companies showing value characteristics (low price-to-book, price-to-earnings ratios). VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index and focuses on large-cap stocks with a documented history of above-average dividend payments alongside value traits. The key distinction: VTV is a value-focused fund that happens to pay dividends; VYM is a dividend-focused fund that also exhibits value characteristics.
How they differ
VYM's explicit tilt toward dividend payers produces a distribution rate of 2.35% versus VTV's 1.90%—a meaningful 45 basis-point spread that compounds over time. Both funds hold beta of 0.68, suggesting similar market sensitivity, but VYM's narrower focus on dividend-paying stocks may create concentration risk in income-oriented sectors compared to VTV's broader value methodology. VYM has a slightly higher expense ratio at 0.06% versus VTV's 0.03%, though both remain very low; VTV's $191B in AUM dwarfs VYM's $83.4B, reflecting VTV's broader mandate and longer track record in the Vanguard suite.
Who each is best for
VTV: Fits investors seeking pure large-cap value exposure without sector or income constraints; works well for those who want the most diversified selection of undervalued companies and prefer lower fees.
VYM: Fits investors who prioritize current dividend income alongside value exposure; matches allocations where elevated yields matter but the investor still wants equity-market participation and moderate volatility.
Key risks to know
- Sector concentration in VYM. A mandate favoring dividend-paying large-cap stocks concentrates exposure in historically high-yield sectors (financials, utilities, REITs) versus VTV's broader value exposure, potentially creating unintended sector bets.
- Dividend-cut risk. VYM's screening for dividend-paying stocks does not guarantee dividend stability; a recession or earnings decline could prompt cuts across the portfolio, eroding the yield advantage that attracted investors.
- Value-trap exposure. Both funds' value tilt means holdings may include companies whose low valuations reflect genuine business deterioration rather than temporary market mispricing; neither screens for quality metrics that might filter out value traps.
- Index correlation and overlap. The funds' holdings likely overlap substantially given both track value-oriented large-cap indexes; the apparent diversification benefit between them is limited, so holding both together provides redundancy rather than meaningful diversification.
Bottom line
If you're building a broad value allocation and want the lowest cost and deepest diversification, VTV's lower expense ratio and larger asset base stand out. If current income is a stated portfolio goal alongside value exposure, VYM's 45 basis-point yield advantage may justify the higher fee—but verify that concentration in dividend-paying sectors fits your target allocation. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.