DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

XOM vs XOMO: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Exxon Mobil Corporation and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs59
Total AUM$9.28B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XOMO.

Side-by-side snapshot

XOMXOMO
Full nameExxon Mobil CorporationYieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMax
Last Close$151.71 as of July 21, 2026$11.09 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield2.80%34.23%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9984
Expense ratio1.01%
AUM$30.7M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyWeekly
Underlying indexExxonMobil (XOM)
ObjectiveExplores, produces, and sells crude oil, natural gas, and petroleum products, and manufactures commodity petrochemicals worldwide.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A08/29/2023
Beta0.162
Last dividend$1.0300$0.0730
Ex-dividend date05/15/202607/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose XOM if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose XOMO if you want to maximize current income — roughly 34.23%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: XOMO's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while XOM keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

XOM has outpaced XOMO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 44.88% total return against 20.52%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: XOM has compounded at 17.30% a year, against 4.45% for XOMO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3YSince Aug 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
XOM25.36%44.88%17.30%14.97%23.3%0.500.69-20.1%
XOMO8.66%20.52%4.45%4.45%19.4%-0.01-0.01-20.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 21, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Aug 2023” measures every fund from August 31, 2023 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock, while XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

XOMO offers the higher yield at 34.23% vs 2.80% for XOM. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, XOM would generate roughly $23.33/month, while XOMO would produce $285.25/month, at current distribution rates.

XOM yield2.80%
XOMO yield34.23%
Monthly diff on $10K$261.92

Cost & efficiency

XOMO charges a 1.01% expense ratio — roughly $1,010 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). XOM is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

XOMO ER1.01%

Strategy & risk

XOM is a stock, while XOMO tracks ExxonMobil (XOM) with a covered call approach.

XOM beta0.162
XOMO beta

Security details

XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock. XOMO is managed by YieldMax (launched 08/29/2023) with $30.7M in assets.

XOMO AUM$30.7M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Is XOM or XOMO better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XOMO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between XOM and XOMO?

XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock, while XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks ExxonMobil (XOM) with a covered call approach. They are issued by — and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both XOM and XOMO?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, XOM or XOMO?

XOMO charges a 1.01% expense ratio. XOM is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in XOM vs XOMO generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in XOM would generate roughly $23.33 per month ($280.00 annually). The same in XOMO would produce about $285.25 per month ($3,423.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, XOM or XOMO?

XOM has outpaced XOMO over the trailing twelve months, posting a 44.88% total return against 20.52%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: XOM has compounded at 17.30% a year, against 4.45% for XOMO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

XOM vs XOMO — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

XOM is the direct equity of Exxon Mobil, the global integrated oil and gas major with exploration, production, and refining operations. XOMO is a newly launched ETF that holds XOM shares and sells weekly covered calls against them to generate additional income. The key distinction: XOM offers long-term capital appreciation potential with a modest 2.92% dividend; XOMO trades that upside for a 34.96% distribution yield financed partly by options premium and partly by NAV decay.

How they differ

The single biggest difference is the income strategy. XOM pays a straightforward quarterly dividend from operating cash flow; XOMO sells out-of-the-money call options weekly and distributes the premium alongside potential return-of-capital, creating a distribution yield more than ten times higher. Second, XOMO's expense ratio of 1.01% and weekly distribution frequency reflect active management and derivative hedging costs that don't apply to owning XOM outright. Third, XOMO's NAV is structurally eroding to fund its distribution rate—a 34.96% annual yield on a $10.56 price implies distributions will consume and exceed underlying price appreciation, slowly grinding down share value. XOM, by contrast, has a beta of 0.162 and has historically delivered both dividends and long-term capital returns; XOMO reports a beta of 0.0, signaling that its covered-call collar eliminates market exposure entirely and caps upside.

Who each is best for

XOM: Fits investors seeking long-term energy exposure with modest, sustainable dividend income and meaningful capital appreciation potential over decades; suits those with oil price conviction and a multi-year or longer time horizon.

XOMO: Fits investors prioritizing immediate cash flow over NAV preservation, with a shorter time horizon (1–3 years) and a willingness to trade upside capped by the call strike for weekly income regardless of market direction.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion. XOMO's 34.96% distribution yield is unsustainable from XOM's underlying 2.92% dividend and capital gains alone; the fund will rely on return-of-capital and NAV decay to meet its payout. Investors holding the fund long-term should expect the share price to decline even if XOM's stock moves sideways.
  • Capped upside. XOMO's covered-call strategy caps gains if XOM rallies sharply. The call strike is typically set slightly out-of-the-money; gains above that strike are forfeited to option buyers, locking in a maximum return even in a strong oil market.
  • Concentration and single-asset risk. XOMO holds only XOM; it has no diversification. Any company-specific event—management change, regulatory penalty, commodity-price shock specific to crude—hits 100% of the portfolio. XOM itself carries oil-price sensitivity and geopolitical exposure.
  • Derivative and rollover risk. Weekly option rolls expose XOMO to call-strike adjustments and implied volatility changes. In a low-volatility environment, call premiums shrink, reducing the fund's ability to generate its stated yield without accelerating NAV decay.
  • XOM commodity and energy transition risk. Both funds carry exposure to crude oil and natural gas prices, which are volatile. Longer-term, energy transition pressures and renewable adoption pose a secular headwind to integrated oil majors' earnings power.

Bottom line

If you're seeking long-term energy exposure with sustainable dividends and capital upside, XOM's simplicity and lower cost structure fit a traditional equity allocation. If you prioritize extracting maximum near-term cash flow and accept that your principal will erode slowly, XOMO's weekly income stream offers that tradeoff—but understand that the 34.96% yield comes at the cost of NAV decay and capped appreciation. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.