AIHY
Not rated
No published distribution safety rating is available.
ETF Comparison
AIHY vs DTCR: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
No track record yet. AIHY launched within the last six months. The forward distribution rate is left blank until a payout is published.
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
DTCR
Generally safe
High confidence
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  AIHY |  DTCR |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF | Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF |
| Issuer | Defiance ETFs | Global X |
| Last Close | $20.46 as of November 6, 2026 | $24.87 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | — | 0.90% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 0.99% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 1.31% | 1.78% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | — | 61 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | — | 0.55% |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $16.5M | $1.88B |
| Distribution frequency | Annual | Semi-Annual |
| Underlying index | — | — |
| Objective | Seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in the companies building and operating the compute backbone of artificial intelligence — spanning AI compute infrastructure, cloud platforms, data centers, semiconductors, and AI software. Holdings must derive at least 50% of revenues, assets, or spending from AI and demonstrate revenue growing faster than operating expenses. | Invests in companies that operate data center REITs and digital infrastructure assets such as cell towers and fiber networks. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 07/20/2026 | 10/27/2020 |
| Beta | — | 1.56 |
| Last dividend | — | $0.112 |
| Ex-dividend date | — | 06/29/2026 |
— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because AIHY launched July 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
AIHY has lagged DTCR over the year to date, posting a 1.66% total return against 17.68%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | Since Jul 2026 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIHY | 1.66% | 1.66% | 28.8% | 0.05 | 0.07 | -13.0% |
| DTCR | 17.68% | -12.61% | 27.5% | -1.77 | -2.30 | -15.6% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 21, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jul 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jul 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Distribution rate and SEC yield
| Metric | AIHY | DTCR |
|---|---|---|
| Forward distribution rate | — | 0.90% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 0.99% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 1.31% | 1.78% |
Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineWe won't call this one: AIHY launched July 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs91
Total AUM$9.47B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Defiance ETFs is known for offering specialized and thematic investment strategies that cater to niche market segments and alternative income approaches. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused funds, leveraged strategies, combinations of leverage with income generation, and thematic products tied to emerging trends and sectors. Defiance emphasizes non-traditional and differentiated strategies rather than broad-based index exposure, appealing to investors seeking targeted exposure beyond conventional ETF offerings.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AIHY.
ETFs116
Total AUM$89.1B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Global X is known for offering a diverse lineup of thematic and income-focused ETFs that cater to both traditional and alternative investment strategies. Their fund families span income generation through covered call strategies and SuperDividend funds, alongside thematic exposure in areas like digital assets, robotics, and emerging markets, complemented by bond and commodities offerings. The issuer provides broad coverage across sector-specific, risk-managed, and growth-oriented strategies, making their lineup particularly notable for investors seeking specialized exposure beyond conventional equity and fixed-income categories.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DTCR.
Quick verdict
AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.
DTCR currently shows a 0.90% distribution yield. AIHY has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.
AIHY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.37% compared to 0.50%.
DTCR has $1.88B in assets vs $16.5M for AIHY, but AIHY only launched July 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
— shared positions
AIHY top-10 holdings unavailable
DTCR 0.0% of its top-10 weight
Top-10 holdings unavailable for AIHY — cannot compute overlap.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, AIHY has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while DTCR would pay about $90.00 a year (about $45.00 per semiannual distribution).
AIHY yield—
DTCR yield0.90%
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, AIHY would cost approximately $370 in fees vs $500 for DTCR (simplified, not compounded). The $130.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
AIHY ER0.37%
DTCR ER0.50%
Strategy & risk
AIHY is an ETF built around technology exposure, while DTCR is an ETF.
AIHY beta—
DTCR beta1.56
Fund details
AIHY is managed by Defiance ETFs (launched 07/20/2026) with $16.5M in assets. DTCR is managed by Global X (launched 10/27/2020) with $1.88B in assets.
AIHY AUM$16.5M
DTCR AUM$1.88B
Frequently asked questions
Which of AIHY or DTCR pays more dividend income?
DTCR currently reports a distribution yield, while AIHY has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.
What is the difference between AIHY and DTCR?
AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF) is an ETF built around technology exposure, while DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) is an ETF. They are issued by Defiance ETFs and Global X respectively.
Can I hold both AIHY and DTCR?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Which has lower fees, AIHY or DTCR?
AIHY has an expense ratio of 0.37% while DTCR charges 0.50%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in AIHY vs DTCR generate?
At current distribution rates, AIHY has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available. $10,000 in DTCR would pay about $90.00 a year (about $45.00 per semiannual distribution).
Which has performed better historically, AIHY or DTCR?
AIHY has lagged DTCR over the year to date, posting a 1.66% total return against 17.68%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare AIHY with
People also compare DTCR with
Popular comparisons
AIHY vs DTCR — at a glance
Generated November 1, 2026.
Overview
AIHY and DTCR both track the data center and digital infrastructure ecosystem, but with different underlying exposures and return mechanics. AIHY is a newer, smaller technology-focused ETF that targets companies deriving at least half their revenue from artificial intelligence hardware and software, while DTCR is a larger, established fund that holds data center REITs and telecom infrastructure operators—an approach weighted toward real estate income and dividends.
How they differ
The single biggest difference is their underlying exposure: AIHY focuses on AI compute builders and consumers—chipmakers, cloud platforms, and AI software vendors—while DTCR invests in the real estate operators and infrastructure tenants that house those systems, including data center REITs, cell tower operators, and fiber providers.
Who each is best for
- AIHY: Fits investors seeking concentrated exposure to AI infrastructure buildout—semiconductor fabs, cloud compute platforms, and AI software vendors—who can tolerate newer, smaller fund structures and are comfortable with capital appreciation as the primary return source over a longer horizon.
- DTCR: Designed for income-seeking investors who want exposure to data center and telecom infrastructure through a dividend-paying vehicle, with acceptance of real estate equity price volatility and a preference for established, larger funds with a longer operating history.
Key risks to know
- Concentration in AI narrative and cyclicality: AIHY filters for companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from AI, which concentrates exposure to the current generative AI cycle. A slowdown in enterprise AI spending or chipmaker capex could sharply reduce both fundamentals and valuation multiples for its holdings.
- REIT interest-rate sensitivity: DTCR holds data center REITs, which typically decline when long-term rates rise due to higher discount rates on their cash flows. Rising rates also increase refinancing costs for leveraged infrastructure operators.
- Valuation compression risk in both: AIHY's holdings are priced for strong AI adoption; DTCR's REIT components trade on forward FFO multiples that can compress if growth assumptions weaken or dividend coverage deteriorates.
Bottom line
If you want direct exposure to the AI compute hardware and software boom with capital appreciation as the primary objective, AIHY offers a concentrated filter; if you prioritize stable income and real estate-backed exposure to the data center ecosystem with an established fund and longer track record, DTCR's 0.90% yield and $1.88B in AUM provide a different entry point. Neither fund's past performance—limited for AIHY—predicts future results, and both benefit from AI infrastructure tailwinds, but their risk profiles and return mechanics are materially different.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.