DTCR
Generally safe
High confidence
ETF Comparison
DTCR vs SRVR: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Best for
- DTCRInvestors who want targeted infrastructure exposure and accept its concentration.
- SRVRInvestors who want higher current income (4.94% paid over the past 12 months vs 0.99% for DTCR).
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
SRVR
Generally safe
High confidence
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  DTCR |  SRVR |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF |
| Issuer | Global X | Pacer |
| Last Close | $24.87 as of November 6, 2026 | $27.92 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 0.90% | 1.07% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.99% | 4.94% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 1.78% | — |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 61 | 60 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 0.55% | 0.64% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.88B | $292M |
| Distribution frequency | Semi-Annual | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | — | Solactive GPR Data & Infrastructure Real Estate Index |
| Objective | Invests in companies that operate data center REITs and digital infrastructure assets such as cell towers and fiber networks. | Tracks the Solactive GPR Data & Infrastructure Real Estate Index, providing exposure to global data and infrastructure real estate companies. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 10/27/2020 | 05/15/2018 |
| Beta | 1.56 | 1.15 |
| Last dividend | $0.112 | $0.637 |
| Ex-dividend date | 06/29/2026 | 09/03/2026 |
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
DTCR has outpaced SRVR over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.18% total return against -5.31%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: DTCR has compounded at 8.92% a year, against -4.75% for SRVR. SRVR has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 18.1% against 22.9% for DTCR. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | 1Y cumulative | 3Y annualized | 5Y annualized | Since Oct 2020 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTCR | 17.68% | 13.18% | 24.41% | 8.92% | 10.65% | 22.9% | 0.78 | 1.10 | -25.0% |
| SRVR | 0.04% | -5.31% | 3.50% | -4.75% | -1.09% | 18.1% | -0.03 | -0.05 | -22.1% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Oct 2020” measures every fund from October 29, 2020 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Distribution rate and SEC yield
| Metric | DTCR | SRVR |
|---|---|---|
| Forward distribution rate | 0.90% | 1.07% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.99% | 4.94% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 1.78% | — |
Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineChoose DTCR if you want targeted infrastructure exposure and accept its concentration. Choose SRVR if you want higher current income (4.94% paid over the past 12 months vs 0.99% for DTCR).
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs116
Total AUM$89.1B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Global X is known for offering a diverse lineup of thematic and income-focused ETFs that cater to both traditional and alternative investment strategies. Their fund families span income generation through covered call strategies and SuperDividend funds, alongside thematic exposure in areas like digital assets, robotics, and emerging markets, complemented by bond and commodities offerings. The issuer provides broad coverage across sector-specific, risk-managed, and growth-oriented strategies, making their lineup particularly notable for investors seeking specialized exposure beyond conventional equity and fixed-income categories.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DTCR.
ETFs72
Total AUM$44.0B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Pacer is known for developing thematic and rules-based ETFs that target specific market trends and investment styles. The issuer's fund lineup spans income-focused strategies, including several covered call funds under the "Cash Cows" family, alongside thematic offerings and value-oriented products designed to capture specific market opportunities. Pacer's approach emphasizes systematic, factor-driven strategies across a diverse range of asset classes and market themes.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SRVR.
Quick verdict
DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.
SRVR has paid the higher yield over the past 12 months, 4.94% vs 0.99% for DTCR. We compare trailing 12-month yields here because SRVR's latest distribution annualizes to 1.07% against 4.94% actually paid over the past 12 months, so annualizing a single payment would misstate its income.
SRVR is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.49% compared to 0.50%.
DTCR is the larger fund by assets ($1.88B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
5 shared positions
DTCR 56.8% of its top-10 weight
SRVR 61.6% of its top-10 weight
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at the rates paid over the past 12 months, DTCR would pay about $99.00 a year (about $49.50 per semiannual distribution on average), while SRVR would pay about $494.00 a year (about $123.50 per quarterly distribution on average).
DTCR 12-month yield0.99%
SRVR 12-month yield4.94%
Annual cash diff on $10K$395.00
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, DTCR would cost approximately $500 in fees vs $490 for SRVR (simplified, not compounded). The $10.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
DTCR ER0.50%
SRVR ER0.49%
Strategy & risk
SRVR tracks Solactive GPR Data & Infrastructure Real Estate Index. DTCR is an ETF whose tracked index or strategy detail is not recorded in our data, so this comparison rests on the measured figures — yield, fees, size, and performance — rather than strategy labels. Beta is 1.56 for DTCR and 1.15 for SRVR, making SRVR the less sensitive to market moves of the two by this measure.
DTCR beta1.56
SRVR beta1.15
Fund details
DTCR is managed by Global X (launched 10/27/2020) with $1.88B in assets. SRVR is managed by Pacer (launched 05/15/2018) with $292M in assets.
DTCR AUM$1.88B
SRVR AUM$292M
Frequently asked questions
What is the current distribution rate for DTCR and SRVR?
Over the past 12 months DTCR paid 0.99% and SRVR 4.94%, based on fund data updated November 2026. We compare trailing 12-month yields here because SRVR's latest distribution annualizes to 1.07% against 4.94% actually paid over the past 12 months, so annualizing a single payment would misstate its income. Yields move with both the payouts and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
Is DTCR or SRVR better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. SRVR has paid the higher trailing 12-month yield (4.94% vs 0.99%). We compare trailing 12-month yields here because SRVR's latest distribution annualizes to 1.07% against 4.94% actually paid over the past 12 months, so annualizing a single payment would misstate its income. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between DTCR and SRVR?
SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) tracks Solactive GPR Data & Infrastructure Real Estate Index. DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) is an ETF whose tracked index or strategy detail is not recorded in our data, so this comparison rests on the measured figures — yield, fees, size, and performance — rather than strategy labels. They are issued by Global X and Pacer respectively.
Can I hold both DTCR and SRVR?
You can, but expect meaningful overlap: 5 of the disclosed top-10 positions are shared (see the holdings-overlap section above). Holding both may double up on the same underlying names rather than diversify.
Is DTCR or SRVR safer?
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: DTCR scores 61, SRVR scores 60. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. SRVR has also been less sensitive to market moves (beta 1.15 vs 1.56 for DTCR). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.
Which has lower fees, DTCR or SRVR?
DTCR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SRVR charges 0.49%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in DTCR vs SRVR generate?
At the rates paid over the past 12 months, $10,000 in DTCR would pay about $99.00 a year (about $49.50 per semiannual distribution on average). $10,000 in SRVR would pay about $494.00 a year (about $123.50 per quarterly distribution on average).
Which has performed better historically, DTCR or SRVR?
DTCR has outpaced SRVR over the trailing twelve months, posting a 13.18% total return against -5.31%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: DTCR has compounded at 8.92% a year, against -4.75% for SRVR. SRVR has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 18.1% against 22.9% for DTCR. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare DTCR with
Popular comparisons
DTCR vs SRVR — at a glance
Generated October 31, 2026.
Overview
DTCR and SRVR are both equity ETFs focused on data center and digital infrastructure real estate, but they differ meaningfully in composition, distribution cadence, and market sensitivity. DTCR invests broadly in data center REITs and digital infrastructure operators (cell towers, fiber); SRVR tracks the Solactive GPR Data & Infrastructure Real Estate Index with a more targeted approach to global data and infrastructure real estate. Both capture exposure to the secular demand for cloud computing and connectivity infrastructure, but through different baskets and index methodologies.
How they differ
The biggest difference is their beta profiles: DTCR carries a 1.56 beta versus SRVR's 1.15, meaning DTCR amplifies broad market moves by roughly 35% more than SRVR does. That translates to sharper gains in rising markets and steeper losses in downturns—a structural difference in volatility, not just recent performance. That cadence matters for reinvestment timing and cash management. Expense ratios are nearly identical: DTCR charges 0.50% and SRVR 0.49%, a 1-basis-point spread that's negligible. DTCR is also the newer fund, having launched after SRVR, yet has grown to roughly 6.5 times SRVR's size.
Who each is best for
DTCR: Fits investors who want a larger, more liquid data center exposure with higher market sensitivity and are comfortable with semi-annual distributions. The higher beta appeals to those seeking amplified upside participation in digital infrastructure rallies.
SRVR: Designed for investors preferring lower volatility relative to the broader market, more frequent (quarterly) income distributions, and exposure to an established index methodology. Works well for those who find DTCR's market sensitivity more aggressive than their risk tolerance allows.
Key risks to know
- Correlation within data center and real estate sectors. Both funds concentrate on overlapping infrastructure themes—data centers, towers, fiber—meaning they may move together during broader real estate or tech-infrastructure selloffs, limiting diversification between them if held together.
- NAV sensitivity to interest rates. Data center REITs and infrastructure operators rely heavily on borrowing, making their valuations and distributions vulnerable to rising rates. Higher rates compress the cash-flow multiples these companies command and increase debt servicing costs.
- DTCR's higher beta amplifies drawdowns. With a beta of 1.56, DTCR will decline roughly 1.56× the market during downturns, concentrating downside risk compared to SRVR's 1.15 beta.
- Distribution yield sustainability. Both funds' yields, while modest, warrant monitoring as rising rates and valuation compression could pressure the earnings of underlying operators and force yield cuts or erosion of NAV if distributions exceed sustainable cash generation. If you want full market correlation and deeper liquidity, DTCR's structure stands out; if you prefer dampened downside and more frequent distributions, SRVR fits differently. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results, and both funds' exposure to rate-sensitive real estate means yields are not locked in.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.