DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AIHY vs ZAP: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 4, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

AIHY has lagged ZAP over the year to date, posting a 7.18% total return against 8.52%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTDSince Jul 2026
AIHY7.18%7.18%
ZAP8.52%-4.07%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 4, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 21, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricAIHYZAP
Full nameDefiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETFGlobal X U.S. Electrification ETF
IssuerDefiance ETFsGlobal X
Last Close$21.34 as of September 4, 2026$31.86 as of September 4, 2026
Distribution rate2.11%
Distribution Safety Score™ 50
Expense ratio0.76%0.50%
AUM$5.26M$461M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying index
ObjectiveSeeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in the companies building and operating the compute backbone of artificial intelligence — spanning AI compute infrastructure, cloud platforms, data centers, semiconductors, and AI software. Holdings must derive at least 50% of revenues, assets, or spending from AI and demonstrate revenue growing faster than operating expenses.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/20/202612/17/2024
Beta0.6103
Last dividend$0.168
Ex-dividend date12/29/202507/06/2026

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because AIHY launched July 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: AIHY launched July 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — ZAP charges 0.50% against 0.76% for AIHY, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs93
Total AUM$11.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Defiance ETFs is known for offering specialized and thematic investment strategies that cater to niche market segments and alternative income approaches. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused funds, leveraged strategies, combinations of leverage with income generation, and thematic products tied to emerging trends and sectors. Defiance emphasizes non-traditional and differentiated strategies rather than broad-based index exposure, appealing to investors seeking targeted exposure beyond conventional ETF offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AIHY.

ETFs116
Total AUM$96.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Global X is known for developing thematic and alternative investment ETFs with a strong emphasis on income-generating strategies. Their 37-fund lineup spans diverse categories including covered call funds, SuperDividend income products, digital assets, commodities, and sector-specific investments, alongside traditional bond and risk-managed income options. Notable tickers like DIV, MLPA, and BCCC reflect their specialization in high-yield and alternative income strategies, positioning them as a provider focused on investors seeking yield-oriented and thematically-driven exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ZAP.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF) and ZAP (Global X U.S. Electrification ETF) are both quarterly-pay ETFs, but they take different approaches.

ZAP currently shows a 2.11% distribution yield. AIHY has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

ZAP is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.50% compared to 0.76%.

ZAP has $461M in assets vs $5.26M for AIHY, but AIHY only launched July 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AIHY has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while ZAP would produce $17.58/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

AIHY yield
ZAP yield2.11%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AIHY would cost approximately $760 in fees vs $500 for ZAP (simplified, not compounded). The $260.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AIHY ER0.76%
ZAP ER0.50%

Strategy & risk

AIHY is an ETF built around technology exposure, while ZAP is an ETF.

AIHY beta
ZAP beta0.6103

Fund details

AIHY is managed by Defiance ETFs (launched 07/20/2026) with $5.26M in assets. ZAP is managed by Global X (launched 12/17/2024) with $461M in assets.

AIHY AUM$5.26M
ZAP AUM$461M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of AIHY or ZAP pays more dividend income?

ZAP currently reports a distribution yield, while AIHY has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between AIHY and ZAP?

AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF) is an ETF built around technology exposure, while ZAP (Global X U.S. Electrification ETF) is an ETF. They are issued by Defiance ETFs and Global X respectively.

Can I hold both AIHY and ZAP?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, AIHY or ZAP?

AIHY has an expense ratio of 0.76% while ZAP charges 0.50%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in AIHY vs ZAP generate?

At current rates, AIHY has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in ZAP would produce about $17.58 per month ($211.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AIHY or ZAP?

AIHY has lagged ZAP over the year to date, posting a 7.18% total return against 8.52%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare AIHY with

People also compare ZAP with

Popular comparisons

AIHY vs ZAP — at a glance

Generated September 6, 2026.

Overview

AIHY and ZAP are both growth-oriented equity ETFs launched recently, but they target fundamentally different megatrends. AIHY focuses narrowly on the compute infrastructure enabling artificial intelligence—data centers, semiconductors, cloud platforms, and AI software companies where at least half of revenue ties directly to AI. ZAP takes a broader electrification angle, capturing utilities, industrials, and related companies benefiting from the shift to electric vehicles, grid modernization, and renewable energy adoption.

How they differ

The biggest distinction is scope: AIHY is a pure-play AI infrastructure bet, while ZAP casts a wider net across the entire electrification ecosystem. AIHY requires portfolio companies to derive at least 50% of revenues, assets, or spending from AI, imposing a strict thematic filter; ZAP has no such concentration requirement and instead captures exposure to a longer-duration trend spanning power grids, transportation, and energy transition. On distribution, ZAP yields 2.11%, paid quarterly, while AIHY does not report a distribution rate—a critical signal that this fund is positioned purely for capital appreciation with no income component. Cost-wise, ZAP is cheaper at 0.50%, compared to AIHY's 0.76%, though both are competitive. Finally, ZAP's AUM of $461M reflects several years of investor traction, while AIHY's $5.26M reflects a micro-cap launch that has yet to build scale.

Who each is best for

AIHY: Fits investors with a high risk tolerance and multi-year horizon who want concentrated exposure to the companies building the compute backbone of artificial intelligence, accepting the volatility that comes with a narrowly focused thematic mandate.

ZAP: Designed for long-term investors seeking exposure to the electrification transition with a modest income component and a portfolio that blends established utility and industrial names alongside emerging electrification beneficiaries.

Key risks to know

  • Concentration and theme drift. AIHY's 50% revenue-from-AI requirement creates a tightly clustered portfolio likely dominated by semiconductors and data-center operators; any pullback in AI capex or margin compression in those sectors could hit most holdings simultaneously. The fund also faces ongoing risk that portfolio companies fail to maintain the 50% threshold, forcing turnover.
  • Early-stage fund maturity. AIHY's $5.26M and 1 month mean the fund has minimal operating history and limited assets to absorb inflows or market stress. Trading may be illiquid during market dislocations, and expense ratios can spike if AUM shrinks.
  • Cyclical semiconductor and capex risk. Both funds carry semiconductor and infrastructure-capex sensitivity, but AIHY's undiversified mandate means it cannot hedge that cyclicality through earnings from other sectors or dividend-paying defensive holdings.
  • ZAP's regulatory and policy dependence. Electrification benefits heavily from policy support; changes to EV incentives, grid-modernization funding, or renewable-energy tax credits could reshape returns. ZAP's 0.6103 suggests it will lag in strong bull markets but also cushion downside.

Bottom line

AIHY and ZAP embody different return profiles and risk appetites. Choose based on whether you want concentrated pure-play AI infrastructure exposure with no near-term income, or broader participation in the energy transition with some downside dampening and quarterly yield. Past performance does not predict future results, and both funds have limited operating history to assess.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.