AIQ
Caution
High confidence
ETF Comparison
AIQ vs BOTZ: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Best for
- AIQInvestors who want targeted technology exposure and accept its concentration.
- BOTZInvestors who want higher current income (0.57% paid over the past 12 months while AIQ makes no distribution).
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
BOTZ
Generally safe
Limited data
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  AIQ | BOTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF |
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Last Close | $56.89 as of November 6, 2026 | $31.05 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 0.00% | 0.12% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.08% | 0.57% |
| 30-day SEC yield | -0.07% | -0.01% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 52 | 64 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 0.04% | 0.08% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.68% |
| AUM | $9.57B | $3.02B |
| Distribution frequency | Semi-Annual | Semi-Annual |
| Underlying index | — | Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index |
| Objective | — | Provide exposure to companies that potentially stand to benefit from increased adoption and utilization of robotics and artificial intelligence. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 05/11/2018 | 09/12/2016 |
| Beta | 1.68 | 1.84 |
| Last dividend | $0.00045 | $0.018 |
| Ex-dividend date | 06/29/2026 | 06/29/2026 |
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
AIQ has outpaced BOTZ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 7.83% total return against -16.79%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: AIQ has compounded at 11.68% a year, against -4.83% for BOTZ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | 1Y cumulative | 3Y annualized | 5Y annualized | Since May 2018 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQ | 10.40% | 7.83% | 26.81% | 11.68% | 17.22% | 25.5% | 0.78 | 1.09 | -26.4% |
| BOTZ | -15.39% | -16.79% | 8.11% | -4.83% | 3.68% | 25.6% | 0.15 | 0.21 | -29.0% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since May 2018” measures every fund from May 16, 2018 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Distribution rate and SEC yield
| Metric | AIQ | BOTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Forward distribution rate | 0.00% | 0.12% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.08% | 0.57% |
| 30-day SEC yield | -0.07% | -0.01% |
Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineChoose AIQ if you want targeted technology exposure and accept its concentration. Choose BOTZ if you want higher current income (0.57% paid over the past 12 months while AIQ makes no distribution).
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs116
Total AUM$89.1B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Global X is known for offering a diverse lineup of thematic and income-focused ETFs that cater to both traditional and alternative investment strategies. Their fund families span income generation through covered call strategies and SuperDividend funds, alongside thematic exposure in areas like digital assets, robotics, and emerging markets, complemented by bond and commodities offerings. The issuer provides broad coverage across sector-specific, risk-managed, and growth-oriented strategies, making their lineup particularly notable for investors seeking specialized exposure beyond conventional equity and fixed-income categories.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AIQ and BOTZ.
Quick verdict
AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both semi-annual-pay ETFs, but they take different approaches.
BOTZ has paid a 0.57% yield over the past 12 months. AIQ has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.
AIQ is the larger fund by assets ($9.57B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.
Who should choose each?
Choose AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
- Want targeted technology exposure and accept the concentration that comes with it.
- Prefer lower market sensitivity — a beta of 1.68 vs 1.84 for BOTZ.
Choose BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
- Want higher current income — BOTZ yields 0.57% paid over the past 12 months while AIQ makes no distribution.
- Want targeted technology exposure and accept the concentration that comes with it.
Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
2 shared positions
AIQ 6.8% of its top-10 weight
BOTZ 10.2% of its top-10 weight
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at the rates paid over the past 12 months, AIQ has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while BOTZ would pay about $57.00 a year (about $28.50 per semiannual distribution on average). Both pay semi-annual distributions.
AIQ yield—
BOTZ 12-month yield0.57%
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, AIQ would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $680 for BOTZ (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.
AIQ ER0.68%
BOTZ ER0.68%
Strategy & risk
AIQ is an ETF built around technology exposure, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index with a technology approach. Beta is 1.68 for AIQ and 1.84 for BOTZ, making AIQ the less sensitive to market moves of the two by this measure.
AIQ beta1.68
BOTZ beta1.84
Fund details
AIQ is managed by Global X (launched 05/11/2018) with $9.57B in assets. BOTZ is managed by Global X (launched 09/12/2016) with $3.02B in assets.
AIQ AUM$9.57B
BOTZ AUM$3.02B
Frequently asked questions
Which of AIQ or BOTZ pays more dividend income?
BOTZ currently reports a distribution yield, while AIQ has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.
What is the difference between AIQ and BOTZ?
AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) is an ETF built around technology exposure, while BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF) tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index with a technology approach. They are issued by Global X and Global X respectively.
Can I hold both AIQ and BOTZ?
Yes. Their disclosed top-10 holdings share only 2 positions, so combining both adds mostly distinct underlying names — see the holdings-overlap section above. Overlap outside the disclosed top 10 can still exist.
Is AIQ or BOTZ safer?
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — BOTZ scores 64, AIQ scores 52, so BOTZ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. AIQ has also been less sensitive to market moves (beta 1.68 vs 1.84 for BOTZ). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.
Which has lower fees, AIQ or BOTZ?
AIQ and BOTZ both charge the same expense ratio of 0.68%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.
How much income does $10,000 in AIQ vs BOTZ generate?
At the rates paid over the past 12 months, AIQ has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available. $10,000 in BOTZ would pay about $57.00 a year (about $28.50 per semiannual distribution on average).
Which has performed better historically, AIQ or BOTZ?
AIQ has outpaced BOTZ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 7.83% total return against -16.79%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: AIQ has compounded at 11.68% a year, against -4.83% for BOTZ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare AIQ with
People also compare BOTZ with
Popular comparisons
AIQ vs BOTZ — at a glance
Generated November 1, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
AIQ and BOTZ are both Global X ETFs pursuing artificial intelligence exposure but with meaningfully different scope. AIQ targets the broader artificial intelligence and technology sector, while BOTZ focuses specifically on robotics and AI adoption.
How they differ
The core difference is breadth. AIQ casts a wider net across AI-adjacent technology, while BOTZ narrows the lens to robotics and AI implementation specifically. Both share the 0.68% expense ratio, but BOTZ's beta of 1.84 exceeds AIQ's 1.68, suggesting BOTZ amplifies market swings more aggressively. On distributions, BOTZ yields 0.12% while AIQ pays 0.00%, making both essentially non-dividend funds—neither is held for income.
Who each is best for
AIQ: Fits investors seeking broad exposure to artificial intelligence trends across the entire technology ecosystem, comfortable with higher volatility in exchange for a larger, more-established fund vehicle with a longer track record.
BOTZ: Designed for investors who believe robotics and physical AI implementation represent the next investment wave, and who accept elevated beta as the price for concentrated thematic exposure outside mainstream tech.
Key risks to know
- Concentration in thematic picks: BOTZ's narrower robotics-and-AI mandate means fewer holdings and potentially higher overlap with a subset of technology. AIQ's broader technology lens reduces single-theme dependency but may dilute exposure to the highest-conviction AI plays. This matters for investors with short time horizons or low risk tolerance.
- Thematic fund concentration risk: Both funds pursue AI as a narrative theme rather than a sector-wide index. If investor enthusiasm for robotics or AI cools, or if the most-favored companies underperform, both may face outflows and NAV pressure independent of their underlying holdings' fundamentals.
- Nascent robotics commercialization: BOTZ's robotics exposure bets on adoption that is still in early stages. Delays in real-world deployment, regulatory hurdles, or technical setbacks could weigh on holdings longer than expected.
Bottom line
If you want exposure across the full technology-AI stack with lower volatility, AIQ's larger asset base and 1.68 beta offer a steadier path; if you believe robotics deployment is the AI megatrend and can tolerate swings, BOTZ's narrower focus and higher beta align with that conviction. Both are non-income vehicles, so neither is suitable for yield-hungry portfolios. Past performance does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.