DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

CHAT vs AIQ: Generative AI Sleeve, or Broader AI Tech?

A head-to-head of Roundhill Generative AI & Technology and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology covering concentration.

Data updated September 18, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings.

AIQ has lagged CHAT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 33.06% total return against 53.18%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: CHAT has compounded at 49.64% a year, against 32.19% for AIQ. AIQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.0% against 33.6% for CHAT. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3YSince May 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AIQ24.69%33.06%32.19%32.69%25.0%0.941.34-26.4%
CHAT48.73%53.18%49.64%46.36%33.6%1.071.52-31.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since May 2023” measures every fund from May 18, 2023 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricAIQCHAT
Full nameGlobal X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETFRoundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
IssuerGlobal XRoundhill Investments
Last Close$64.13 as of September 18, 2026$89.82 as of September 18, 2026
Distribution rate0.00%—
Distribution Safety Score™ 6950
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.05%—
Expense ratio0.68%0.75%
AUM$10.1B$1.75B
Distribution frequencySemi-AnnualAnnual
Underlying index——
Objective—Actively managed ETF investing in companies positioned to benefit from generative artificial intelligence and related technologies, spanning large-language-model platforms, semiconductor and IT-hardware infrastructure, and enterprise and consumer generative-AI software.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/11/201805/18/2023
Beta1.682.04
Last dividend$0.0004$1.681
Ex-dividend date06/29/202612/29/2025

Bottom lineAIQ and CHAT are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar technology exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: AIQ is cheaper at 0.68% vs 0.75%.

Broad AI-and-technology versus generative AI

AIQ is a wider AI-and-technology book. CHAT concentrates on generative-AI names. Sleeve width is the live difference.

AIQCHAT
SleeveBroader AI and technologyGenerative-AI concentration
Expense ratio0.68%0.75%
Fund size$10.1B$1.75B
Model this comparison:
Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Global X
ETFs117
Total AUM$94.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Global X is known for developing thematic and alternative investment ETFs with a strong emphasis on income-generating strategies. Their 37-fund lineup spans diverse categories including covered call funds, SuperDividend income products, digital assets, commodities, and sector-specific investments, alongside traditional bond and risk-managed income options. Notable tickers like DIV, MLPA, and BCCC reflect their specialization in high-yield and alternative income strategies, positioning them as a provider focused on investors seeking yield-oriented and thematically-driven exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AIQ.

See all Global X ETFs
Roundhill Investments
ETFs56
Total AUM$37.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CHAT.

See all Roundhill Investments ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

AIQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.68% compared to 0.75%.

AIQ is the larger fund by assets ($10.1B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AIQ has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while CHAT has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

AIQ yield0.00%
CHAT yield—

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AIQ would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $750 for CHAT (simplified, not compounded). The $70.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AIQ ER0.68%
CHAT ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

AIQ is an ETF built around technology exposure, while CHAT is an actively managed ETF built around technology exposure. Beta is 1.68 for AIQ and 2.04 for CHAT, making AIQ the less volatile of the two by this measure.

AIQ beta1.68
CHAT beta2.04

Fund details

AIQ is managed by Global X (launched 05/11/2018) with $10.1B in assets. CHAT is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 05/18/2023) with $1.75B in assets.

AIQ AUM$10.1B
CHAT AUM$1.75B
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between AIQ and CHAT?

AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) is a broader AI-and-technology book. CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) concentrates on generative-AI names. Sleeve width is the live difference. Cost is 0.68% versus 0.75%; size is $10.1B versus $1.75B. Distributions are 0.00% and — as of September 2026.

Which of AIQ or CHAT pays more dividend income?

CHAT currently reports a distribution yield, while AIQ has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

Can I hold both AIQ and CHAT?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is AIQ or CHAT safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — AIQ scores 69, CHAT scores 50, so AIQ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. AIQ has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.68 vs 2.04 for CHAT). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, AIQ or CHAT?

AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while CHAT charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in AIQ vs CHAT generate?

At current rates, AIQ has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. CHAT has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, AIQ or CHAT?

AIQ has lagged CHAT over the trailing twelve months, posting a 33.06% total return against 53.18%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: CHAT has compounded at 49.64% a year, against 32.19% for AIQ. AIQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.0% against 33.6% for CHAT. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare AIQ with

AIQ vs BOTZAIQ vs AIHYAIQ vs HLTH

People also compare CHAT with

CHAT vs BOTZ

Popular comparisons

JEPI vs JEPQSCHD vs VYMVOO vs VTIJEPI vs SCHD

AIQ vs CHAT — at a glance

Generated September 19, 2026.

Overview

AIQ and CHAT are both technology ETFs focused on artificial intelligence exposure, but they pursue fundamentally different strategies. AIQ is a passively managed fund tracking a broad AI and technology index with lower volatility and a longer track record. CHAT is an actively managed fund launched in 2023 that concentrates on companies building or benefiting from generative AI specifically—language models, semiconductor infrastructure, and enterprise software—and carries higher beta as a result.

How they differ

The biggest difference is management style: AIQ follows an index methodology, while CHAT relies on active stock selection. This shows up in their risk profiles—CHAT's beta of 2.04 versus AIQ's 1.68 reflects CHAT's tilt toward smaller or faster-growing generative AI plays. Expense-wise, AIQ charges 0.68% compared to CHAT's 0.75%; the gap is small, but CHAT's active management adds cost relative to index tracking.

Who each is best for

  • AIQ: Fits investors seeking broad AI and technology exposure through a systematic, rules-based approach with lower volatility and a track record spanning multiple market cycles.
  • CHAT: Fits investors who believe active managers can identify outperformers within the narrower generative-AI ecosystem and are comfortable with higher volatility for potential alpha generation.

Key risks to know

  • Generative AI valuation concentration. Both funds target the same thematic area, but CHAT's active strategy concentrates on companies directly monetizing or building generative AI infrastructure. If generative AI adoption slows or faces regulatory headwinds, CHAT may see sharper declines than the broader tech exposure in AIQ.
  • High beta and drawdown risk. CHAT's 2.04 beta means it amplifies market moves in both directions; during a tech selloff, losses could be roughly double the index. AIQ's 1.68 beta is still elevated but offers somewhat more cushion.
  • Short track record for CHAT. Inception in May 2023 means CHAT has weathered less than two years of market history. Its active manager's stock-picking record is unproven across a full market cycle, making it harder to assess whether the 7-basis-point fee premium delivers value.
  • Sector concentration risk. Both funds are heavily weighted to technology and AI. Holdings likely overlap significantly, which means diversification between them is limited if you hold both.

Bottom line

If you prioritize stability and a long operating history, AIQ's indexed approach and lower beta offer a smoother entry to AI exposure. If you believe active management can capture outsized returns from generative AI winners and can tolerate higher volatility, CHAT's concentrated strategy and higher beta may appeal—though its brief track record means you're partly betting on the manager's judgment in a rapidly evolving space. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Dividend growth vs. high yield Yield on cost, explained How expense ratios eat returns

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener