DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AIHY vs AIQ: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 8, 2026

No track record yet. AIHY launched within the last six months. The forward distribution rate is left blank until a payout is published.

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

AIHY has outpaced AIQ over the shared window since Jul 2026, posting a 13.87% total return against 9.18%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Jul 2026
AIHY13.87%
AIQ9.18%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. β€œSince Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 21, 2026 β€” the start of shared available history β€” so all funds share one comparison window.

Distribution rate and SEC yield

MetricAIHYAIQ
Forward distribution rateβ€”0.00%
Trailing 12-month yieldβ€”0.07%
30-day SEC yield-0.25%-0.26%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricAIHYAIQ
Full nameDefiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETFGlobal X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
IssuerDefiance ETFsGlobal X
Last Close$22.28 as of October 8, 2026$65.60 as of October 8, 2026
Distribution rateβ€”0.00%
Trailing 12-month yieldβ€”0.07%
30-day SEC yield-0.25%-0.26%
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ β€”52
Safety-Adjusted Yield β€”0.04%
Expense ratio0.37%0.68%
AUM$17.0M$10.5B
Distribution frequencyAnnualSemi-Annual
Underlying indexβ€”β€”
ObjectiveSeeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in the companies building and operating the compute backbone of artificial intelligence β€” spanning AI compute infrastructure, cloud platforms, data centers, semiconductors, and AI software. Holdings must derive at least 50% of revenues, assets, or spending from AI and demonstrate revenue growing faster than operating expenses.β€”
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/20/202605/11/2018
Betaβ€”1.68
Last dividendβ€”$0.00045
Ex-dividend dateβ€”06/29/2026

β€” Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because AIHY launched July 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: AIHY launched July 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same β€” AIHY charges 0.37% against 0.68% for AIQ, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs89
Total AUM$11.5B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Defiance ETFs is known for offering specialized and thematic investment strategies that cater to niche market segments and alternative income approaches. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused funds, leveraged strategies, combinations of leverage with income generation, and thematic products tied to emerging trends and sectors. Defiance emphasizes non-traditional and differentiated strategies rather than broad-based index exposure, appealing to investors seeking targeted exposure beyond conventional ETF offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AIHY.

ETFs118
Total AUM$94.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Global X is known for offering a diverse lineup of thematic and income-focused ETFs that cater to both traditional and alternative investment strategies. Their fund families span income generation through covered call strategies and SuperDividend funds, alongside thematic exposure in areas like digital assets, robotics, and emerging markets, complemented by bond and commodities offerings. The issuer provides broad coverage across sector-specific, risk-managed, and growth-oriented strategies, making their lineup particularly notable for investors seeking specialized exposure beyond conventional equity and fixed-income categories.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AIQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

AIHY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.37% compared to 0.68%.

AIQ has $10.5B in assets vs $17.0M for AIHY, but AIHY only launched July 2026 β€” AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AIHY has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while AIQ has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

AIHY yieldβ€”
AIQ yield0.00%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AIHY would cost approximately $370 in fees vs $680 for AIQ (simplified, not compounded). The $310.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AIHY ER0.37%
AIQ ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

AIHY is an ETF built around technology exposure, while AIQ is an ETF built around technology exposure.

AIHY betaβ€”
AIQ beta1.68

Fund details

AIHY is managed by Defiance ETFs (launched 07/20/2026) with $17.0M in assets. AIQ is managed by Global X (launched 05/11/2018) with $10.5B in assets.

AIHY AUM$17.0M
AIQ AUM$10.5B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of AIHY or AIQ pays more dividend income?

Neither AIHY nor AIQ currently reports a distribution yield, so neither is an income fund today. Compare them on holdings, cost, and total return instead.

What is the difference between AIHY and AIQ?

AIHY (Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF) is an ETF built around technology exposure, while AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) is an ETF built around technology exposure. They are issued by Defiance ETFs and Global X respectively.

Can I hold both AIHY and AIQ?

Yes β€” nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, AIHY or AIQ?

AIHY has an expense ratio of 0.37% while AIQ charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in AIHY vs AIQ generate?

At current rates, AIHY has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available. AIQ has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, AIHY or AIQ?

AIHY has outpaced AIQ over the shared window since Jul 2026, posting a 13.87% total return against 9.18%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AIHY vs AIQ β€” at a glance

Generated October 4, 2026.

Overview

AIHY and AIQ are both technology-focused ETFs that seek exposure to artificial intelligence and related opportunities, but they target fundamentally different slices of the AI investment landscape. AIHY focuses narrowly on the compute infrastructure supporting AI β€” data centers, semiconductors, cloud platforms, and AI software companies β€” with a revenue-based screen requiring 50% of earnings tied to AI. AIQ takes a broader approach to AI and technology stocks globally without such strict revenue thresholds, casting a wider net across the sector.

How they differ

The most significant difference is scope: AIHY is a specialized infrastructure play, while AIQ is a general AI and technology equity fund. AIHY requires holdings to derive at least half their revenue from AI activity, creating a concentrated bet on the companies directly powering the AI buildout. AIQ imposes no such revenue filter, allowing it to hold a wider range of technology and AI-adjacent businesses.

The funds diverge sharply in size and maturity. AIQ has $10.5B in assets under management versus $17.0M for AIHY, reflecting years of institutional adoption β€” AIQ launched on 05/11/2018 β€” while AIHY is a newly launched fund arriving in 07/20/2026. AIQ reports a 1.68 beta, indicating sensitivity to market moves that differs from funds tracking broader indexes. AIQ reports a 0.00% distribution rate, while AIHY does not report a distribution rate.

Who each is best for

AIHY: Fits investors seeking narrow, thematic exposure to the physical and software backbone powering AI deployment β€” compute, semiconductors, and data-center companies β€” and who are willing to accept the higher concentration and liquidity constraints of a brand-new, smaller fund.

AIQ: Designed for investors seeking broad exposure to AI and technology stocks with the liquidity and cost efficiency of an established, multi-billion-dollar fund, and who value a longer track record through prior market cycles.

Key risks to know

  • Concentration in AI infrastructure: AIHY's mandate to hold only companies with 50%+ AI-linked revenue creates a narrower portfolio exposed to cyclical demand for compute and semiconductors. A slowdown in AI adoption or capex spending by cloud providers could pressure the entire holdings list at once. Newly launched thematic funds occasionally close or consolidate if they fail to attract assets.
  • Technology sector concentration in both: Both funds concentrate in technology and AI, so their holdings likely overlap significantly. A rotation away from growth and technology stocks would pressure both, limiting diversification benefit if held together.
  • Valuation risk for early-stage AI themes: AI infrastructure and AI-related technology stocks have traded at elevated valuations based on growth expectations. Both funds are exposed to the risk that valuation multiples compress if adoption timelines slip or competitive intensity increases.
  • Market sensitivity: AIQ reports a 1.68 beta, indicating it moves with greater amplitude than broad market benchmarks. Investors uncomfortable with pronounced swings during technology downturns should account for this characteristic.

Bottom line

If you want narrowly targeted exposure to the companies physically building AI infrastructure and can tolerate the liquidity and tracking costs of a micro-cap fund, AIHY's infrastructure focus and lower expense ratio fit that profile. Both carry significant sector concentration and sensitivity to technology valuations; past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.