DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AMDW vs CHPY: AMD WeeklyPay or Semiconductor Income?

AMDW seeks amplified calendar-week exposure to AMD. CHPY holds a portfolio of semiconductor companies and uses options for income. CHPY spreads company exposure across a sector, but remains exposed to semiconductor industry downturns.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • AMDWInvestors who want amplified weekly AMD exposure and accept single-company risk.
  • CHPYInvestors who want a semiconductor options-income portfolio and accept sector concentration.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

AMDW has outpaced CHPY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 349.12% total return against 91.04%. Measured from Jul 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” AMDW has compounded at 250.62% a year versus 87.33% for CHPY. CHPY has been the steadier holding, though β€” annualized volatility of 40.2% against 85.8% for AMDW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Jul 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AMDW213.59%349.12%250.62%85.8%1.702.76-34.6%
CHPY64.94%91.04%87.33%40.2%1.502.16-27.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. β€œSince Jul 2025” measures every fund from July 24, 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) β€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β€” shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricAMDWCHPY
Forward distribution rate68.26%40.28%
Trailing 12-month yield48.08%40.16%
30-day SEC yieldβ€”-0.38%
Return of capital100.00%99.88%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on AMDW vs AMD.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricAMDWCHPY
Full nameRoundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETFYieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
IssuerRoundhill InvestmentsYieldMax
Underlying indexAMD (AMD)Basket (Semiconductor companies)
Last Close$102.17 as of September 30, 2026$69.51 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate68.26%40.28%
Trailing 12-month yield48.08%40.16%
30-day SEC yieldβ€”-0.38%
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ 6379
Safety-Adjusted Yield 43.00%31.82%
Expense ratio1.00%1.03%
AUM$171M$1.30B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveAMDW targets weekly payouts and 120% of the weekly total return of Advanced Micro Devices before fees.Seeks weekly income by holding a portfolio of U.S.-listed semiconductor equities and generating premium through an options overlay written on those holdings and on semiconductor ETFs.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/24/202504/02/2025
Beta3.43981.8613
Last dividend$1.341104$0.5385 declared, pays 10/01/2026
Ex-dividend date09/28/202609/30/2026

Bottom lineChoose AMDW if you want amplified weekly AMD exposure and accept single-company risk. Choose CHPY if you want a semiconductor options-income portfolio and accept sector concentration. CHPY holds multiple semiconductor companies, whereas AMDW concentrates on AMD with leveraged weekly exposure. That changes company-specific risk but does not remove sector risk. The options overlay also changes CHPY's return path. Check current holdings overlap and compare both funds over shared dates.

AMDW vs CHPY: AMD WeeklyPay or Semiconductor Income?

AMDW seeks amplified calendar-week exposure to AMD. CHPY holds a portfolio of semiconductor companies and uses options for income. CHPY spreads company exposure across a sector, but remains exposed to semiconductor industry downturns.

AMDWCHPY
ApproachAMD single-stock exposureSemiconductor company portfolio
Risk reviewAMD losses and leverage compoundingSector losses and option trade-offs
Expense ratio1.00%1.03%
Portfolio fitReview combined holdings and weightsReview combined holdings and weights

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Daily leverage reset. AMDW targets a multiple of the index's DAILY move, resetting every session. Over weeks and months the compounding of daily resets (volatility decay) can drag returns far below the stated multiple, especially in choppy markets β€” and losses are magnified the same way gains are.
  • Capped upside and premium dependence. CHPY generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time β€” the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs56
Total AUM$39.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AMDW.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CHPY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

AMDW seeks amplified calendar-week exposure to AMD. CHPY holds a portfolio of semiconductor companies and uses options for income. CHPY spreads company exposure across a sector, but remains exposed to semiconductor industry downturns.

CHPY holds multiple semiconductor companies, whereas AMDW concentrates on AMD with leveraged weekly exposure. That changes company-specific risk but does not remove sector risk. The options overlay also changes CHPY's return path. Check current holdings overlap and compare both funds over shared dates.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AMDW would generate roughly $131.27 cash per distribution, while CHPY would produce $77.46 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

AMDW yield68.26%
CHPY yield40.28%
Cash diff on $10K$53.81

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AMDW would cost approximately $1,000 in fees vs $1,030 for CHPY (simplified, not compounded). The $30.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AMDW ER1.00%
CHPY ER1.03%

Strategy & risk

AMDW seeks amplified calendar-week exposure to AMD. CHPY holds a portfolio of semiconductor companies and uses options for income. CHPY spreads company exposure across a sector, but remains exposed to semiconductor industry downturns. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection.

AMDW beta3.4398
CHPY beta1.8613

Fund details

AMDW is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 07/24/2025) with $171M in assets. CHPY is managed by YieldMax (launched 04/02/2025) with $1.30B in assets.

AMDW AUM$171M
CHPY AUM$1.30B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is CHPY a diversified replacement for AMDW?

CHPY holds multiple semiconductor companies, whereas AMDW concentrates on AMD with leveraged weekly exposure. That changes company-specific risk but does not remove sector risk. The options overlay also changes CHPY's return path. Check current holdings overlap and compare both funds over shared dates.

How should I compare risk and ownership costs?

Use matching dates and definitions for returns, distributions, and fees. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection. Check current bid-ask spreads and premiums or discounts; AUM alone does not determine the price available for your order.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.