DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ARMY vs CHPY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Tema International Defense Innovation ETF and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • ARMYInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • CHPYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 40.28%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

ARMY has lagged CHPY over the shared window since Feb 2026, posting a -15.95% total return against 45.77%. ARMY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 29.4% against 46.5% for CHPY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Feb 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ARMY-15.95%29.4%-1.14-1.57-19.3%
CHPY45.77%46.5%1.251.80-27.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Feb 2026” measures every fund from February 24, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Feb 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Feb 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricARMYCHPY
Forward distribution rate—40.28%
Trailing 12-month yield—40.16%
30-day SEC yield—-0.38%
Return of capital—99.88%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricARMYCHPY
Full nameTema International Defense Innovation ETFYieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
IssuerTema ETFsYieldMax
Last Close$23.14 as of September 30, 2026$69.51 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate—40.28%
Trailing 12-month yield—40.16%
30-day SEC yield—-0.38%
Distribution Safety Score™ —79
Safety-Adjusted Yield —31.82%
Expense ratio0.68%1.03%
AUM$7.35M$1.30B
Distribution frequencyNoneWeekly
Underlying index—Basket (Semiconductor companies)
Objective—Seeks weekly income by holding a portfolio of U.S.-listed semiconductor equities and generating premium through an options overlay written on those holdings and on semiconductor ETFs.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date—04/02/2025
Beta1.12831.8613
Last dividend—$0.5385 declared, pays 10/01/2026
Ex-dividend date—09/30/2026

Bottom lineChoose ARMY if you want broad equity exposure. Choose CHPY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 40.28%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: CHPY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while ARMY keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. CHPY generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs13
Total AUM$3.86B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Tema ETFs is known for offering thematically focused and income-oriented strategies that target specific industries and trends rather than broad market exposure. The issuer's lineup spans both income-generating funds and thematic investments centered on sectors such as defense, healthcare, technology, and infrastructure, with tickers including ARMY, CANC, DSPY, HLTH, LAZR, NASA, and VOLT. Tema's approach appeals to investors seeking targeted exposure to niche market segments, combining specialized industry focus with dividend and yield strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ARMY.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CHPY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

ARMY (Tema International Defense Innovation ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

CHPY currently shows a 40.28% distribution yield. ARMY has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

ARMY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.68% compared to 1.03%.

CHPY is the larger fund by assets ($1.30B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose ARMY

Tema International Defense Innovation ETF

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.68% expense ratio vs 1.03% for CHPY.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.1 vs 1.9 for CHPY.

Choose CHPY

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — CHPY distributes roughly 40.28% from selling options premium, while ARMY makes no distribution.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ARMY has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while CHPY would produce $77.46 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

ARMY yield—
CHPY yield40.28%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ARMY would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $1,030 for CHPY (simplified, not compounded). The $350.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ARMY ER0.68%
CHPY ER1.03%

Strategy & risk

ARMY is an ETF built around defense exposure, while CHPY tracks Basket (Semiconductor companies) with a covered call approach. Beta is 1.1283 for ARMY and 1.8613 for CHPY, making ARMY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

ARMY beta1.1283
CHPY beta1.8613

Fund details

ARMY is managed by Tema ETFs with $7.35M in assets. CHPY is managed by YieldMax (launched 04/02/2025) with $1.30B in assets.

ARMY AUM$7.35M
CHPY AUM$1.30B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of ARMY or CHPY pays more dividend income?

CHPY currently reports a distribution yield, while ARMY has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between ARMY and CHPY?

ARMY (Tema International Defense Innovation ETF) is an ETF built around defense exposure, while CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) tracks Basket (Semiconductor companies) with a covered call approach. They are issued by Tema ETFs and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both ARMY and CHPY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, ARMY or CHPY?

ARMY has an expense ratio of 0.68% while CHPY charges 1.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ARMY vs CHPY generate?

At current rates, ARMY has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available. The same in CHPY would produce about $77.46 cash per distribution ($4,028.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ARMY or CHPY?

ARMY has lagged CHPY over the shared window since Feb 2026, posting a -15.95% total return against 45.77%. ARMY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 29.4% against 46.5% for CHPY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ARMY vs CHPY — at a glance

Generated September 27, 2026.

Overview

ARMY and CHPY are both equity ETFs, but they pursue fundamentally different strategies. ARMY invests in international defense companies with a traditional buy-and-hold approach and no distributions. CHPY holds a basket of U.S. semiconductor stocks and generates weekly income by selling call options against its holdings and semiconductor ETFs—a synthetic covered-call strategy designed to produce cash payouts regardless of underlying price movement.

How they differ

The core difference is strategy: ARMY is a passive international equity fund focused on the defense sector, while CHPY is an active options overlay fund layering covered calls on semiconductor holdings to generate premium income. CHPY's 1.03% expense ratio and $1.30B in assets are substantially larger than ARMY's 0.68% expense ratio and $7.35M in assets, reflecting the scale and operational complexity of options strategies. CHPY also carries a beta of 1.8613, about 1.6 times ARMY's 1.1283, indicating higher sensitivity to broad market moves—common in leveraged or derivative-heavy strategies.

Who each is best for

  • ARMY: Fits investors seeking exposure to international defense-sector equities without an explicit income goal, and who can tolerate the style and geographic concentration of a single-sector international fund.
  • CHPY: Fits investors prioritizing near-term cash distributions over capital appreciation, with a high risk tolerance for options strategies, elevated volatility, and the structural dynamics of synthetic income that may not correlate directly to underlying semiconductor performance.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at elevated distribution yields. CHPY's 40.28% annualized distribution rate may rely significantly on return-of-capital treatment or principal erosion, particularly if semiconductors underperform or implied volatility declines and option premiums shrink. Weekly rebalancing and option assignment can accelerate this dynamic.
  • Derivatives and assignment risk. CHPY's covered calls may be assigned away during sharp rallies in semiconductor stocks, forcing the fund to forfeit upside participation while locked into call strikes. Conversely, steep declines leave call protection worthless while the portfolio loses value.
  • Concentration in semiconductors. CHPY's entire exposure is to a single sector; a downturn in chip demand, geopolitical disruption to supply chains, or margin compression across the industry can cascade across the portfolio with no diversification buffer.
  • International single-sector concentration in ARMY. Defense spending, geopolitical relations, and export controls vary sharply across countries; a reduction in military budgets, trade restrictions, or regional deescalation can pressure the fund's narrow mandate without offsetting diversification.

Bottom line

If you want traditional sector exposure and can accept no current distributions, ARMY offers a lean international defense strategy. If you prioritize weekly cash income and accept the complexity and risks of options-based payouts, CHPY delivers a higher nominal yield—though the distribution structure and derivative mechanics demand close monitoring. Past performance does not predict future results, and both funds' underlying exposures overlap with the broader equity market's economic cycle.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.