DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SHY vs USFR: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • SHYInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.
  • USFRInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SHY has lagged USFR over the trailing twelve months, posting a 2.59% total return against 4.01%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: USFR has compounded at 2.53% a year, against 1.66% for SHY. USFR has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Feb 2014Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SHY0.78%2.59%4.19%1.81%1.66%1.48%1.6%-0.23-0.33-1.0%
USFR2.45%4.01%4.68%3.85%2.53%1.98%0.3%0.300.44-0.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Feb 2014” measures every fund from February 4, 2014 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSHYUSFR
Full nameiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETFWisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
IssueriSharesWisdomTree
Last Close$82.02 as of August 19, 2026$50.46 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield3.67%3.80%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7478
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
AUM$25.5B$18.6B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond IndexBloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index
ObjectiveTracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.Track the performance of U.S. Treasury floating-rate notes (FRNs).
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date07/22/200202/04/2014
Beta0.22-0.02
Last dividend$0.2508$0.1599
Ex-dividend date08/03/202607/28/2026

Bottom lineSHY and USFR are both for investors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Fees and payouts are close too, so it comes down to which your broker offers commission-free and any share-price or tax-lot preference.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs473
Total AUM$4710B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SHY.

ETFs94
Total AUM$103B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

WisdomTree is known for developing thematic and factor-based ETFs that go beyond traditional market-cap weighting approaches. The issuer maintains a broad lineup spanning dividend and income strategies, international equities, commodities, bonds, digital assets, and specialized thematic areas like megatrends and alternatives. WisdomTree's diverse fund family appeals to investors seeking both traditional income exposure and more specialized strategies, with popular tickers across equity, fixed income, and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on USFR.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

USFR offers the higher yield at 3.80% vs 3.67% for SHY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

They track different benchmarks: SHY is linked to ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SHY is the larger fund by assets ($25.5B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SHY would generate roughly $30.58/month, while USFR would produce $31.67/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

SHY yield3.67%
USFR yield3.80%
Monthly diff on $10K$1.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SHY would cost approximately $150 in fees vs $150 for USFR (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

SHY ER0.15%
USFR ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index with a bonds approach. Beta is 0.22 for SHY and -0.02 for USFR, making USFR the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SHY beta0.22
USFR beta-0.02

Fund details

SHY is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $25.5B in assets. USFR is managed by WisdomTree (launched 02/04/2014) with $18.6B in assets.

SHY AUM$25.5B
USFR AUM$18.6B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for SHY and USFR?

SHY currently distributes 3.67% and USFR 3.80%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SHY or USFR better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. USFR currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SHY and USFR?

SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index with a bonds approach. They are issued by iShares and WisdomTree respectively.

Can I hold both SHY and USFR?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SHY or USFR safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — USFR scores 78, SHY scores 74, so USFR's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. USFR has also shown lower price volatility (beta -0.02 vs 0.22 for SHY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SHY or USFR?

SHY and USFR both charge the same expense ratio of 0.15%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in SHY vs USFR generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SHY would generate roughly $30.58 per month ($367.00 annually). The same in USFR would produce about $31.67 per month ($380.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SHY or USFR?

SHY has lagged USFR over the trailing twelve months, posting a 2.59% total return against 4.01%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: USFR has compounded at 2.53% a year, against 1.66% for SHY. USFR has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare SHY with

People also compare USFR with

Popular comparisons

SHY vs USFR — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Overview

SHY and USFR are both Treasury-focused ETFs with monthly distributions and matching 0.15% expense ratios, but they target different parts of the curve. SHY holds fixed-rate Treasury bonds maturing in 1–3 years, tracking the ICE index; USFR holds floating-rate Treasury notes (FRNs) that reset their coupons periodically, usually every three months. The key distinction: SHY's yield is locked in, while USFR's income rises or falls with Fed rate moves.

How they differ

The fundamental difference is rate sensitivity. SHY carries a beta of 0.22, meaning it has measurable price risk if Treasury yields move; when rates rise, fixed-coupon bonds decline in value. USFR's beta of –0.02 is near-zero because its coupon resets frequently to track current rates, so it avoids the principal fluctuation that afflicts fixed-rate bonds. This makes USFR significantly more stable in price but also means it offers less upside if rates fall—a floating coupon won't capture the capital gain that a locked-in fixed rate would deliver.

On yield, USFR edges out SHY at 3.80% versus 3.67%, a modest premium that reflects the credit quality and shorter duration of floating-rate Treasuries. Both distribute monthly and charge 0.15%, so the fee picture is identical. SHY is larger, with $25.2B in AUM versus USFR's $19.0B, reflecting a longer history (SHY began in 2002, USFR in 2014) and broader recognition among Treasury investors.

Who each is best for

  • SHY: Fits investors seeking a stable, diversified short-duration Treasury position who are comfortable with modest price fluctuations if they hold to maturity; the fixed rate locks in current yields over 1–3 years.
  • USFR: Designed for investors prioritizing capital preservation and consistent cash flow over a rising or stable rate environment; the floating coupon appeal to those expecting rates to stay elevated or climb further.

Key risks to know

  • Duration risk (SHY only): SHY's 0.22 beta means its NAV moves with Treasury yields. A 100-basis-point rise in short-term rates could reduce SHY's price by roughly 1.5–2%, whereas USFR's near-zero beta isolates it from such moves.
  • Reinvestment risk for USFR: If short-term rates fall sharply, USFR's coupons reset lower at each quarterly adjustment, reducing income for reinvestment. An investor relying on a 3.80% yield today cannot assume that rate will persist if the Fed cuts substantially.
  • Opportunity cost: SHY investors who hold through a falling-rate environment will have locked in today's 3.67% yield; if rates drop, new money could have earned less, but they won't benefit from the capital appreciation that USFR's stable NAV forgoes. Conversely, USFR holders benefit from price stability but lose upside if rates decline.
  • Liquidity and holdings overlap: Both funds hold U.S. Treasuries and may contain overlapping positions, though their indices differ (ICE 1–3 Year vs. Bloomberg Floating Rate). Verify actual holdings if concentration risk matters to your plan.

Bottom line

If you want to lock in a slightly higher multi-year yield with modest price volatility, SHY's fixed-rate structure appeals; if you prioritize NAV stability and prefer income to adjust with Fed policy, USFR's floating rate is the trade-off. Both are backed by Treasury credit and low fees, so the choice hinges on your view of rate direction and tolerance for principal fluctuation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.