DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SHY vs USFR: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • SHYInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.
  • USFRInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

SHY has lagged USFR over the trailing twelve months, posting a 1.15% total return against 4.05%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: USFR has compounded at 2.54% a year, against 1.60% for SHY. USFR has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Feb 2014Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SHY0.15%1.15%3.89%1.68%1.60%1.41%1.6%-0.41-0.58-1.0%
USFR2.94%4.05%4.63%3.94%2.54%2.00%0.3%0.130.19-0.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Feb 2014” measures every fund from February 4, 2014 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricSHYUSFR
Full nameiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETFWisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
IssueriSharesWisdomTree
Underlying indexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond IndexBloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index
Last Close$81.05 as of October 2, 2026$50.40 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate3.57%3.77%
Trailing 12-month yield3.63%3.73%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9580
Safety-Adjusted Yield 3.39%3.02%
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
AUM$26.2B$19.6B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
ObjectiveTracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.Track the performance of U.S. Treasury floating-rate notes (FRNs).
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date07/22/200202/04/2014
Beta0.22-0.02
Last dividend$0.241 declared, pays 10/06/2026$0.15824
Ex-dividend date10/01/202609/25/2026

Bottom lineSHY and USFR are both for investors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Fees and payouts are close too, so it comes down to which your broker offers commission-free and any share-price or tax-lot preference.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs466
Total AUM$4683B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SHY.

ETFs94
Total AUM$102B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

WisdomTree is known for developing thematic and factor-based ETFs that go beyond traditional market-cap weighting approaches. The issuer maintains a broad lineup spanning dividend and income strategies, international equities, commodities, bonds, digital assets, and specialized thematic areas like megatrends and alternatives. WisdomTree's diverse fund family appeals to investors seeking both traditional income exposure and more specialized strategies, with popular tickers across equity, fixed income, and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on USFR.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

USFR offers the higher yield at 3.77% vs 3.57% for SHY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

They have different reference exposures: SHY is linked to ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index while USFR is linked to Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SHY is the larger fund by assets ($26.2B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SHY would generate roughly $29.75 cash per distribution, while USFR would produce $31.42 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

SHY yield3.57%
USFR yield3.77%
Cash diff on $10K$1.67

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SHY would cost approximately $150 in fees vs $150 for USFR (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

SHY ER0.15%
USFR ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index with a bonds approach. Beta is 0.22 for SHY and -0.02 for USFR, making USFR the less volatile of the two by this measure.

SHY beta0.22
USFR beta-0.02

Fund details

SHY is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $26.2B in assets. USFR is managed by WisdomTree (launched 02/04/2014) with $19.6B in assets.

SHY AUM$26.2B
USFR AUM$19.6B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for SHY and USFR?

SHY currently distributes 3.57% and USFR 3.77%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is SHY or USFR better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. USFR currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SHY and USFR?

SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index with a bonds approach. They are issued by iShares and WisdomTree respectively.

Can I hold both SHY and USFR?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is SHY or USFR safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SHY scores 95, USFR scores 80, so SHY's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. USFR has also shown lower price volatility (beta -0.02 vs 0.22 for SHY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, SHY or USFR?

SHY and USFR both charge the same expense ratio of 0.15%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in SHY vs USFR generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SHY would generate roughly $29.75 cash per distribution ($357.00 annually). The same in USFR would produce about $31.42 cash per distribution ($377.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SHY or USFR?

SHY has lagged USFR over the trailing twelve months, posting a 1.15% total return against 4.05%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: USFR has compounded at 2.54% a year, against 1.60% for SHY. USFR has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SHY vs USFR — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

SHY and USFR are both Treasury-focused ETFs that distribute monthly, but they track different maturity segments and rate-adjustment mechanisms. SHY holds fixed-rate Treasuries across the 1-3 year curve, while USFR tracks floating-rate Treasury notes that reset regularly based on short-term benchmarks. The distinction matters: one offers predictable coupon income tied to current yields; the other offers yield that rises and falls with Fed policy and overnight rates.

How they differ

The core difference is structure. SHY holds conventional fixed-rate Treasury bonds in the 1-3 year maturity range, meaning its coupons are locked in at purchase.

That structural choice cascades into yield and duration risk. SHY's 3.57% distribution rate is tied to the fixed coupons on its holdings plus any price appreciation from falling yields; USFR's 3.77% yield reflects the floating coupon resets and is more sensitive to near-term rate expectations. SHY carries a 0.22 beta, indicating its price falls when yields rise (typical of fixed-rate bonds); USFR's -0.02 beta suggests floating-rate bonds move almost independent of traditional interest-rate swings, since their coupons adjust upward as rates rise, offsetting price declines.

Both charge 0.15% in fees and distribute monthly.

Who each is best for

SHY: Investors seeking a predictable, fixed income stream from very short-dated Treasury bonds and willing to accept modest principal volatility if yields rise sharply. Fits portfolios that want the "safety of Treasuries" with a known coupon schedule.

USFR: Investors who believe short-term rates will stay elevated or rise further, or who want to minimize the duration risk of owning bonds in a rising-rate environment. Designed for allocations where the ability to capture higher yields as Fed policy tightens matters more than a locked-in coupon.

Key risks to know

  • Duration risk in SHY. Fixed-rate bonds lose market value when yields rise. SHY's 1-3 year maturity profile limits that loss compared to longer bonds, but a rapid or sustained rate hike will create principal losses that 3.57% distributions cannot offset during the holding period.
  • Coupon reset lag in USFR. Although floating-rate notes protect against long-term rate risk, their coupons typically reset only once per quarter or twice yearly. In a sharply rising-rate environment, there is a lag before USFR's yield fully captures the new rates; in a falling-rate environment, yields compress quickly and may lag SHY's floor.
  • Reinvestment risk and near-zero yields. Both funds depend on monthly distributions being reinvested at prevailing yields. If rates fall significantly from current levels, future reinvestment yields on both distributions and maturing positions could be materially lower than today's 3.57% or 3.77%.
  • Index-tracking basis. Neither fund holds all Treasuries in its underlying index; both hold a representative sample. Tracking error is usually small but can widen during periods of illiquidity or index reconstitution.

Bottom line

SHY works for investors willing to accept moderate price sensitivity to rising rates in exchange for a predictable, fixed coupon stream. USFR appeals to those expecting rates to remain elevated or anticipating further tightening, since its floating structure caps principal damage while allowing yields to expand with Fed policy. Neither is inherently superior—the choice hinges on your rate outlook and tolerance for coupon certainty versus interest-rate optionality. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.