DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SHY vs USFR: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs34
Total AUM$303.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is known for offering a diverse range of exchange-traded funds with a particular strength in income-generating strategies. Their fund lineup spans core equity positions, covered call strategies, and dedicated income funds, with notable tickers including HDV (high dividend), ICSH (short-term corporate bonds), and TLTW (Treasury ladder with calls). The issuer maintains a focused portfolio of five ETFs that cater to investors seeking yield enhancement and income strategies across different asset classes and market segments.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SHY.

ETFs5
Total AUM$40.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

WisdomTree is recognized for its specialized approach to dividend and income-focused ETFs, offering funds designed to capture yield through both traditional dividends and alternative income strategies. The company's limited lineup of three ETFs concentrates on income generation across different market segments, with popular tickers including DGRW (dividend growth), DLN (dividend growth with a defensive tilt), and USFR (floating-rate bonds). WisdomTree distinguishes itself in the ETF space by emphasizing tax-efficient dividend selection and exposure to less-traditional income sources beyond standard equity dividends.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on USFR.

Side-by-side snapshot

SHYUSFR
Full nameiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETFWisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
IssueriSharesWisdomTree
Last Close$82.10 as of May 20, 2026$50.44 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield3.58%3.60%
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
AUM$25.1B$17.0B
Distribution frequencyβ€”Monthly
Underlying indexβ€”Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index
ObjectiveTracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.Track the performance of U.S. Treasury floating-rate notes (FRNs).
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception dateβ€”02/04/2014
Beta0.24-0.02
Last dividend$0.24$0.16
Ex-dividend date05/01/202604/27/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

USFR offers the higher yield at 3.60% vs 3.58% for SHY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SHY is the larger fund by assets ($25.1B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SHY would generate roughly $29.83/month, while USFR would produce $30.00/month, at current distribution rates.

SHY yield3.58%
USFR yield3.60%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.17

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SHY would cost approximately $150 in fees vs $150 for USFR (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

SHY ER0.15%
USFR ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

SHY tracks β€” with a basket approach, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index using a bonds strategy. Beta is 0.24 for SHY and -0.02 for USFR, indicating USFR is less volatile relative to the market.

SHY beta0.24
USFR beta-0.02

Fund details

SHY is managed by iShares (launched β€”) with $25.1B in assets. USFR is managed by WisdomTree (launched 02/04/2014) with $17.0B in assets.

SHY AUM$25.1B
USFR AUM$17.0B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is SHY or USFR better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. USFR currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SHY and USFR?

SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks β€” with a basket strategy, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index with a bonds approach. They are issued by iShares and WisdomTree respectively.

Can I hold both SHY and USFR?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, SHY or USFR?

SHY and USFR both charge the same expense ratio of 0.15%, so neither is cheaper on fees β€” pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in SHY vs USFR generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SHY would generate roughly $29.83 per month ($358.00 annually). The same in USFR would produce about $30.00 per month ($360.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

People also compare SHY with

People also compare USFR with

Popular comparisons

SHY vs USFR β€” at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

SHY and USFR are both Treasury ETFs offering identical 3.61% distribution rates and matching 0.15% expense ratios, but they track completely different bond universes. SHY holds fixed-rate Treasury bonds maturing in 1–3 years; USFR holds floating-rate Treasury notes where the coupon resets regularly with short-term rates. The choice between them hinges on your view of interest rates and tolerance for price volatility.

How they differ

The fundamental difference: SHY's bonds have locked-in coupons; USFR's coupons float with the Fed's target rate. This means SHY's price falls when rates rise and climbs when rates fallβ€”it has meaningful duration risk (beta 0.24). USFR's price stays nearly flat because its coupon automatically adjusts upward when rates rise and downward when they fall (beta -0.02), cushioning principal swings.

Second, SHY is volatile enough to move meaningfully over a yearβ€”its 52-week range spans $83.20 to $82.21. USFR is rock-solid stable; its 52-week range is just $50.49 to $50.23, a variance of less than 0.5%. That's the hallmark of floating-rate Treasury exposure.

Third, SHY's larger AUM ($24.7 billion vs. $17.6 billion) reflects its status as the more established Treasury short-duration play. Both charge the same 0.15% fee, so cost is a wash.

Who each is best for

SHY: Investors expecting interest rates to decline or hold steady, with a moderate time horizon and preference for modest capital appreciation alongside income. Works well in taxable accounts if you want to capture rate-driven price appreciation.

USFR: Conservative investors prioritizing principal stability over potential gains, those uncomfortable watching NAV fluctuate, or retirees who need dependable income without worrying about rate-driven losses. Ideal for very short-term bond allocation in any account type.

Key risks to know

  • Duration risk (SHY): If the Fed raises rates again, SHY's NAV will decline. A 100-basis-point rate increase would likely shave 2–3% off its price. USFR insulates you from this by design.
  • Yield compression risk (USFR): If Fed funds rates fall sharply, USFR's distribution will decline in tandem. You're trading principal stability for the possibility of lower monthly income.
  • Reinvestment risk (both): At current short rates, rolling maturing Treasuries into new positions at lower yields is a real headwind in a declining-rate environment.
  • Inflation erosion: Neither fund protects against inflation. A 3.6% yield barely clears inflation if price pressure persists.

Bottom line

If you expect rates to stay flat or fall, SHY's modest price upside potential and larger AUM make it the more interesting choiceβ€”you'll capture both distribution and capital appreciation. If you prize predictability and can't tolerate NAV swings, USFR's floating-rate mechanic keeps your principal anchored while you collect the same 3.61% yield. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results; your decision should rest on your rate forecast and risk tolerance.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.