DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BLOX vs ULTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Nicholas Crypto Income ETF and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 25, 2026

Best for

  • BLOXInvestors who want crypto exposure that pays you along the way, not just price gains.
  • ULTYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 60.50%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BLOX has lagged ULTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -6.66% total return against -4.54%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — BLOX has compounded at 9.33% a year versus 1.11% for ULTY. ULTY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.1% against 56.9% for BLOX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BLOX-4.69%-6.66%9.33%56.9%-0.20-0.28-47.1%
ULTY8.42%-4.54%1.11%22.1%-0.41-0.54-24.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 25, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 17, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricBLOXULTY
Full nameNicholas Crypto Income ETFYieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerNicholas Wealth ManagementYieldMax
Underlying indexBasket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies)Basket (High Volatility stocks)
Last Close$13.52 as of August 25, 2026$26.44 as of August 25, 2026
Distribution yield33.46%60.50%
Distribution Safety Score™ 4343
Expense ratio0.99%1.30%
AUM$301M$758M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveSeeks to provide current income and capital appreciation through exposure to crypto-related companies with an options strategy generating weekly income distributions.Actively managed fund that seeks weekly income from a rotating basket of U.S.-listed securities, using traditional and synthetic covered calls designed to produce higher income when the underlying holdings are more volatile.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/17/202502/28/2024
Beta3.11211.3581
Last dividend$0.0870$0.3076
Ex-dividend date08/21/202608/26/2026

Bottom lineChoose BLOX if you want crypto exposure that pays you along the way, not just price gains. Choose ULTY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 60.50%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: ULTY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while BLOX keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. BLOX and ULTY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.
  • Crypto volatility. BLOX sits on top of crypto-asset prices, which routinely swing far more than equities. A single drawdown can exceed a year of distributions, so income projections deserve extra skepticism here.
  • Daily leverage reset. ULTY targets a multiple of the index's DAILY move, resetting every session. Over weeks and months the compounding of daily resets (volatility decay) can drag returns far below the stated multiple, especially in choppy markets — and losses are magnified the same way gains are.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs13
Total AUM$633M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Nicholas Wealth Management operates a focused lineup of 10 ETFs that emphasize digital assets, income generation, and thematic investing strategies. The issuer's portfolio includes specialized funds targeting sectors such as blockchain (BLOX), precious metals (GLDN, SLVX), nuclear energy (NUKX), and digital finance (FIAX), alongside income-focused offerings. This niche positioning reflects the firm's focus on alternative and emerging investment themes rather than broad market exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BLOX.

ETFs59
Total AUM$9.50B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ULTY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) and ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

ULTY offers the higher yield at 60.50% vs 33.46% for BLOX. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BLOX is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.99% compared to 1.30%.

They track different benchmarks: BLOX is linked to Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) while ULTY tracks Basket (High Volatility stocks), which means their performance drivers differ.

ULTY is the larger fund by assets ($758M), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose BLOX

Nicholas Crypto Income ETF

  • Want crypto exposure that pays income rather than waiting on price alone.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.99% expense ratio vs 1.30% for ULTY.

Choose ULTY

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — ULTY distributes roughly 60.50% from selling options premium, vs 33.46% for BLOX.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.4 vs 3.1 for BLOX.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BLOX would generate roughly $278.83/month, while ULTY would produce $504.17/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

BLOX yield33.46%
ULTY yield60.50%
Monthly diff on $10K$225.33

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BLOX would cost approximately $990 in fees vs $1,300 for ULTY (simplified, not compounded). The $310.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BLOX ER0.99%
ULTY ER1.30%

Strategy & risk

BLOX tracks Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) with an options approach, while ULTY is actively managed around Basket (High Volatility stocks) exposure with a covered call approach. Beta is 3.1121 for BLOX and 1.3581 for ULTY, making ULTY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

BLOX beta3.1121
ULTY beta1.3581

Fund details

BLOX is managed by Nicholas Wealth Management (launched 06/17/2025) with $301M in assets. ULTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/28/2024) with $758M in assets.

BLOX AUM$301M
ULTY AUM$758M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for BLOX and ULTY?

BLOX currently distributes 33.46% and ULTY 60.50%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is BLOX or ULTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. ULTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BLOX and ULTY?

BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) tracks Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) with an options approach, while ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) is actively managed around Basket (High Volatility stocks) exposure with a covered call approach. They are issued by Nicholas Wealth Management and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both BLOX and ULTY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is BLOX or ULTY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: BLOX scores 43, ULTY scores 43. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. ULTY has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.36 vs 3.11 for BLOX). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, BLOX or ULTY?

BLOX has an expense ratio of 0.99% while ULTY charges 1.30%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BLOX vs ULTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BLOX would generate roughly $278.83 per month ($3,346.00 annually). The same in ULTY would produce about $504.17 per month ($6,050.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BLOX or ULTY?

BLOX has lagged ULTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -6.66% total return against -4.54%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — BLOX has compounded at 9.33% a year versus 1.11% for ULTY. ULTY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.1% against 56.9% for BLOX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BLOX vs ULTY — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

BLOX and ULTY are both equity-focused options ETFs with weekly distributions, but they pursue fundamentally different strategies. BLOX targets cryptocurrency-related companies and uses an options overlay to generate income, while ULTY rotates through a basket of high-volatility U.S. stocks with synthetic and traditional covered calls. The core distinction is their underlying exposure: BLOX is a focused crypto equity bet with a 37.72% distribution rate, while ULTY is a broader volatility-harvesting strategy with a 60.33% distribution rate.

How they differ

The biggest difference is underlying asset class. BLOX's portfolio centers on companies with cryptocurrency exposure, giving it direct equity risk to the crypto sector alongside its options income. ULTY, by contrast, builds income from a rotating basket of mainstream U.S. equities selected for volatility, avoiding sector concentration. That structural choice drives their second major difference: distribution yield. ULTY's 60.33% distribution rate nearly doubles BLOX's 37.72%, reflecting ULTY's reliance on synthetic covered calls and active management to harvest volatility premiums. Third, BLOX carries substantially higher beta (3.1121 vs. 1.3581), meaning its crypto-related holdings amplify market moves—a tradeoff for the concentrated sector exposure that can fuel both gains and losses.

Who each is best for

  • BLOX: Fits investors with a high risk tolerance who want crypto sector exposure augmented by income-generating options strategies, willing to accept significant price volatility in pursuit of weekly payouts.
  • ULTY: Designed for investors seeking aggressive current income from U.S. equity volatility, with the ability to withstand a rotating basket of stocks and synthetic derivatives, and comfort with the higher distribution rate that may include more return-of-capital over long periods.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. ULTY's 60.33% annualized distribution rate is likely unsustainable from underlying stock returns alone, raising the risk that a growing portion of distributions rely on return-of-capital treatment and gradual NAV erosion over extended holding periods.
  • Crypto sector concentration. BLOX's portfolio of cryptocurrency-related companies concentrates risk in a single sector that carries regulatory, technological, and adoption uncertainty, amplified by its 3.11 beta.
  • Synthetic covered call and derivative risk. ULTY's use of synthetic covered calls and active derivatives management introduces counterparty and timing risk; if volatility collapses or the fund's call-writing strategy misfires, income generation could decline sharply while holdings remain exposed to equity drawdowns.
  • High optionality and NAV volatility. Both funds use options overlays to generate weekly income, meaning NAV can swing significantly with implied volatility changes, market gaps, or earnings events, separate from the underlying stock price movements.
  • Reinvestment and compounding effects. Weekly distributions at these yields make it harder for capital to compound; an investor depending on the payouts forgoes reinvestment compounding, while one reinvesting faces timing risk and potential tax drag in taxable accounts.

Bottom line

If you're drawn to crypto equity exposure with income, BLOX offers a narrower, more volatile lens on the sector. If you prioritize maximum weekly income from broader U.S. stock baskets and can tolerate return-of-capital distributions, ULTY's higher yield and larger asset base may appeal—but both carry meaningful NAV and optionality risk at these distribution rates. Past performance, especially over the short life of these funds, does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.