DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BLOX vs ULTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Tidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETF and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 11, 2026

ETFs10
Total AUM$643M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Nicholas Wealth Management operates a focused lineup of 10 ETFs that emphasize digital assets, income generation, and thematic investing strategies. The issuer's portfolio includes specialized funds targeting sectors such as blockchain (BLOX), precious metals (GLDN, SLVX), nuclear energy (NUKX), and digital finance (FIAX), alongside income-focused offerings. This niche positioning reflects the firm's focus on alternative and emerging investment themes rather than broad market exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BLOX.

ETFs60
Total AUM$9.78B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ULTY.

Side-by-side snapshot

BLOXULTY
Full nameTidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETFYieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerNicholas Wealth ManagementYieldMax
Last Close$14.57 as of July 11, 2026$28.65 as of July 11, 2026
Distribution yield38.54%61.35%
Distribution Safety Score 4450
Expense ratio0.99%1.14%
AUM$321M$914M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Underlying indexBasket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies)Basket (High Volatility stocks)
ObjectiveSeeks to provide current income and capital appreciation through exposure to crypto-related companies with an options strategy generating weekly income distributions.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/17/202502/21/2024
Beta3.11211.3581
Last dividend$0.1080$0.3380
Ex-dividend date07/06/202607/08/2026

Bottom lineChoose BLOX if you want crypto exposure that pays you along the way, not just price gains. Choose ULTY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 61.35%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: ULTY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while BLOX keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BLOX has outpaced ULTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -6.03% total return against -7.29%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — BLOX has compounded at 7.01% a year versus -3.69% for ULTY. ULTY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.0% against 54.5% for BLOX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BLOX-7.87%-6.03%7.01%54.5%-0.20-0.27-47.1%
ULTY2.81%-7.29%-3.69%22.0%-0.55-0.71-24.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 10, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 17, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BLOX (Tidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) and ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

ULTY offers the higher yield at 61.35% vs 38.54% for BLOX. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BLOX is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.99% compared to 1.14%.

They track different benchmarks: BLOX is linked to Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) while ULTY tracks Basket (High Volatility stocks), which means their performance drivers differ.

ULTY is the larger fund by assets ($914M), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose BLOX

Tidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETF

  • Want crypto exposure that pays income rather than waiting on price alone.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.99% expense ratio vs 1.14% for ULTY.

Choose ULTY

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — ULTY distributes roughly 61.35% from selling options premium, vs 38.54% for BLOX.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.4 vs 3.1 for BLOX.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BLOX would generate roughly $321.17/month, while ULTY would produce $511.25/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

BLOX yield38.54%
ULTY yield61.35%
Monthly diff on $10K$190.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BLOX would cost approximately $990 in fees vs $1,140 for ULTY (simplified, not compounded). The $150.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BLOX ER0.99%
ULTY ER1.14%

Strategy & risk

BLOX tracks Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) with an options approach, while ULTY tracks Basket (High Volatility stocks) with a covered call approach. Beta is 3.1121 for BLOX and 1.3581 for ULTY, indicating ULTY is less volatile relative to the market.

BLOX beta3.1121
ULTY beta1.3581

Fund details

BLOX is managed by Nicholas Wealth Management (launched 06/17/2025) with $321M in assets. ULTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/21/2024) with $914M in assets.

BLOX AUM$321M
ULTY AUM$914M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BLOX or ULTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. ULTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BLOX and ULTY?

BLOX (Tidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) tracks Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) with an options approach, while ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Basket (High Volatility stocks) with a covered call approach. They are issued by Nicholas Wealth Management and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both BLOX and ULTY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, BLOX or ULTY?

BLOX has an expense ratio of 0.99% while ULTY charges 1.14%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BLOX vs ULTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BLOX would generate roughly $321.17 per month ($3,854.00 annually). The same in ULTY would produce about $511.25 per month ($6,135.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BLOX or ULTY?

BLOX has outpaced ULTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -6.03% total return against -7.29%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — BLOX has compounded at 7.01% a year versus -3.69% for ULTY. ULTY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.0% against 54.5% for BLOX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BLOX vs ULTY — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BLOX and ULTY are both weekly-income ETFs employing options overlays on equity baskets, but they target fundamentally different underlying exposures. BLOX focuses on crypto-adjacent companies (fintech, mining, blockchain infrastructure) with a 39.00% distribution rate, while ULTY targets high-volatility stocks across traditional equity markets with a 62.41% distribution rate. The key distinction: BLOX's beta of 3.1121 reflects concentration in a nascent, volatile sector; ULTY's beta of 1.3581 shows higher relative stability despite a much larger yield harvest.

How they differ

The most obvious difference is yield magnitude. ULTY distributes 62.41% annually, more than 60% higher than BLOX's 39.00% yield. This gap stems from ULTY's strategy of writing calls against high-volatility equities—a narrower band of stocks engineered for options premium extraction—versus BLOX's broader crypto-related basket. Second, BLOX carries three times the systematic risk: its 3.1121 beta means it swings roughly 3× as hard as the broad market, while ULTY's 1.3581 beta suggests more measured volatility despite weekly distributions. Third, ULTY is substantially larger ($914M AUM versus $321M) and has been in the market longer (since February 2024 versus June 2025), giving it a track record through market cycles. BLOX's nascent inception date—less than a year ago—means its ability to sustain a 39% yield through a downturn or sector drawdown remains unproven.

Who each is best for

BLOX: Fits investors with high risk tolerance who believe in long-term crypto-sector fundamentals and want weekly income as a bonus feature rather than the primary portfolio driver. The extreme beta makes this a satellite holding, not a core income engine.

ULTY: Fits investors seeking aggressive weekly income from a moderately volatile equity basket and willing to accept the trade-off that covered-call capping may limit upside participation when underlying volatility contracts or stocks rally sharply.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. ULTY's 62.41% annualized payout rate is nearly impossible to match through underlying price appreciation or dividend income alone; substantial return-of-capital treatment is likely, which erodes NAV over time and creates a mathematical headwind for long-term holders.
  • Crypto sector concentration and regulatory risk. BLOX's exposure to crypto-adjacent equities carries binary tail risk: a major regulatory crackdown, stablecoin failure, or market saturation in blockchain infrastructure could trigger sector-wide repricing that a 3.11 beta amplifies dramatically.
  • Call cap risk on ULTY. The covered-call overlay limits upside capture when underlying volatility mean-reverts or individual holdings surge; investors miss explosive rallies in exchange for steady premium income.
  • Shallow asset bases and liquidity. BLOX's $321M AUM is tight for an ETF; redemption stress or outflows could widen spreads or force portfolio rebalancing at inopportune moments, especially in a crypto downturn when liquidity dries up first.
  • Options decay and roll risk. Both funds depend on selling weekly options profitably; periods of low realized volatility or liquidity compression in the underlying options markets can shrink premium capture and pressure the distribution rate.

Bottom line

If you want exposure to crypto-sector equities with income as a secondary feature and can tolerate a beta above 3, BLOX delivers a lower yield with higher growth optionality. If you prioritize maximum current income from a diversified high-volatility basket and accept that call capping and NAV decay are inherent trade-offs, ULTY's higher distribution and larger asset base offer a more established framework. Both carry structural risks—BLOX from sector concentration and ULTY from mathematical distribution unsustainability—that warrant treating them as tactical or satellite positions rather than core holdings. Past performance, especially for BLOX's short track record, does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.