DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BLOX vs BTCI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Tidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs10
Total AUM$634M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Nicholas Wealth Management operates a focused lineup of 10 ETFs that emphasize digital assets, income generation, and thematic investing strategies. The issuer's portfolio includes specialized funds targeting sectors such as blockchain (BLOX), precious metals (GLDN, SLVX), nuclear energy (NUKX), and digital finance (FIAX), alongside income-focused offerings. This niche positioning reflects the firm's focus on alternative and emerging investment themes rather than broad market exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BLOX.

ETFs19
Total AUM$24.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BTCI.

Side-by-side snapshot

BLOXBTCI
Full nameTidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETFNEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
IssuerNicholas Wealth ManagementNEOS
Last Close$14.40 as of July 4, 2026$27.90 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield42.36%28.09%
Distribution Safety Score3346
Expense ratio0.99%0.98%
AUM$321M$1.09B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyMonthly
Underlying indexBasket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies)Bitcoin ETPs
ObjectiveSeeks to provide current income and capital appreciation through exposure to crypto-related companies with an options strategy generating weekly income distributions.Seeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through bitcoin exposure.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/17/202510/16/2024
Beta3.11211.6764
Last dividend$0.1173$0.6530
Ex-dividend date06/26/202601/21/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BLOX has outpaced BTCI over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.17% total return against -37.67%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — BLOX has compounded at 5.96% a year versus -35.77% for BTCI. BTCI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 40.2% against 54.3% for BLOX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BLOX-8.95%-2.17%5.96%54.3%-0.12-0.17-47.1%
BTCI-28.96%-37.67%-35.77%40.2%-1.29-1.67-48.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 17, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BLOX (Tidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BLOX offers the higher yield at 42.36% vs 28.09% for BTCI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BTCI is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.98% compared to 0.99%.

They track different benchmarks: BLOX is linked to Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) while BTCI tracks Bitcoin ETPs, which means their performance drivers differ.

BTCI is the larger fund by assets ($1.09B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BLOX would generate roughly $353.00/month, while BTCI would produce $234.08/month, at current distribution rates.

BLOX yield42.36%
BTCI yield28.09%
Monthly diff on $10K$118.92

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BLOX would cost approximately $990 in fees vs $980 for BTCI (simplified, not compounded). The $10.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BLOX ER0.99%
BTCI ER0.98%

Strategy & risk

BLOX tracks Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) with a crypto approach, while BTCI tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach. Beta is 3.1121 for BLOX and 1.6764 for BTCI, indicating BTCI is less volatile relative to the market.

BLOX beta3.1121
BTCI beta1.6764

Fund details

BLOX is managed by Nicholas Wealth Management (launched 06/17/2025) with $321M in assets. BTCI is managed by NEOS (launched 10/16/2024) with $1.09B in assets.

BLOX AUM$321M
BTCI AUM$1.09B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BLOX or BTCI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. BLOX currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BLOX and BTCI?

BLOX (Tidal Trust II - Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) tracks Basket (Equity portfolio focused on crypto-related companies) with a crypto approach, while BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach. They are issued by Nicholas Wealth Management and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both BLOX and BTCI?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BLOX or BTCI?

BLOX has an expense ratio of 0.99% while BTCI charges 0.98%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BLOX vs BTCI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BLOX would generate roughly $353.00 per month ($4,236.00 annually). The same in BTCI would produce about $234.08 per month ($2,809.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BLOX or BTCI?

BLOX has outpaced BTCI over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.17% total return against -37.67%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — BLOX has compounded at 5.96% a year versus -35.77% for BTCI. BTCI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 40.2% against 54.3% for BLOX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BLOX with

People also compare BTCI with

Popular comparisons

BLOX vs BTCI — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BLOX and BTCI are both crypto-focused income ETFs launched in 2024–2025, but they differ fundamentally in underlying exposure and distribution mechanics. BLOX holds a basket of crypto-related equities and uses an options overlay to generate weekly distributions at a 38.15% rate. BTCI holds bitcoin exposure through bitcoin ETPs and targets monthly distributions at 28.74%, with a stated focus on tax efficiency. The key distinction: BLOX chases income from equity volatility and call-writing across a diversified crypto sector; BTCI targets income from bitcoin's direct price action and derivatives.

How they differ

BLOX's 38.15% distribution yield is nearly 10 percentage points higher than BTCI's 28.74%, but that premium comes from weekly payout frequency and a synthetic income strategy layered on top of equity holdings. The underlying exposure matters too: BLOX spreads risk across crypto-related companies, while BTCI concentrates on bitcoin itself through ETPs—a narrower, more direct bitcoin play. Beta tells the story of that difference. BLOX's beta of 3.11 signals roughly three times the volatility of the broad market, while BTCI's 1.68 beta is roughly half that, reflecting bitcoin's lower correlation to equities despite its own price swings. BTCI also carries $1.09 billion in AUM versus BLOX's $321 million, suggesting more established institutional adoption. Expense ratios are nearly identical at 0.98–0.99%.

Who each is best for

BLOX: Fits investors seeking maximum current income from crypto sector participation and willing to accept weekly distribution volatility and elevated price swings in exchange for a high headline yield. The options-overlay structure appeals to those comfortable with synthetic income generation.

BTCI: Designed for income-focused investors wanting concentrated bitcoin exposure without the leverage of equity bets on crypto firms. The monthly cadence and stated tax efficiency appeal to those seeking a steadier distribution schedule and a more direct commodity-like bitcoin position.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. A 38.15% distribution rate (BLOX) is likely to erode NAV if underlying assets do not appreciate at a matching pace. Distributions may increasingly rely on return of capital rather than actual income or gains, a risk heightened by the fund's youth and limited performance history.
  • Volatility and leverage embedded in options strategy. BLOX's weekly call-writing against a volatile equity basket can magnify downside capture during crypto sell-offs while capping upside. The 3.11 beta suggests the fund amplifies market moves; combined with weekly rebalancing, this creates potential for unexpected drawdowns.
  • Bitcoin concentration and price volatility. BTCI's focus on bitcoin ETPs means performance hinges almost entirely on bitcoin price action. While bitcoin's lower equity correlation can provide diversification, its price swings remain substantial, and the 1.68 beta still reflects meaningful leverage relative to traditional equities.
  • Limited track record. BLOX was launched in June 2025 and BTCI in October 2024. Neither has lived through a full market cycle or stress period. Yield sustainability and NAV stability remain untested assumptions.
  • Options and derivatives expiration risk. Both funds rely on options or derivatives strategies. Rapid repricing, liquidity gaps, or extended market dislocations could impair the mechanical income-generation process BLOX depends on weekly.

Bottom line

If you prioritize maximum current income and accept high volatility across crypto equity exposure, BLOX's 38.15% weekly yield and equity basket appeal; if you want a more focused bitcoin position with a steadier monthly payout and lower beta, BTCI's 28.74% yield and bitcoin ETP foundation stand out. Both carry the risk that extreme yields rely on NAV decay rather than sustainable earnings—a concern amplified by their recent launches and lack of full-cycle performance data.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.