ETF Comparison

BND vs LQD: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

Vanguard

ETFs115

Total AUM$4484B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that emphasize broad market exposure and long-term investing. The company operates 175 ETFs across diverse fund families including Index, Bond, Equity, Dividend, Income, International, Factor, and ESG strategies, serving investors with various goals from core portfolio building to specialized income generation. Notable for its scale and popular tickers like VB (total U.S. small-cap), BND (total bond market), and VBIAX (international bonds), Vanguard focuses on providing comprehensive, index-based investment solutions with an emphasis on cost efficiency and accessibility.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BND.

See all Vanguard ETFs

iShares

ETFs481

Total AUM$4451B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on LQD.

See all iShares ETFs

Side-by-side snapshot

	BND	LQD
Full name	Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
Last Close	$73.11 as of July 4, 2026	$108.64 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield	4.01%	4.21%
Distribution Safety Score	100	96
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.14%
AUM	$158B	$29.2B
Distribution frequency	Monthly	Monthly
Underlying index	Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index	Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Objective	Track the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index for broad U.S. bond exposure.	Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset class	Fixed Income	Fixed Income
Inception date	04/03/2007	07/22/2002
Beta	0.98	1.33
Last dividend	$0.2445	$0.3815
Ex-dividend date	07/01/2026	08/03/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Build a sample portfolio Forecast income

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BND has outpaced LQD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.34% total return against 3.17%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — LQD has compounded at 2.23% a year, ahead of BND at 1.41%. BND has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 5.3% against 7.3% for LQD. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Symbol	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y	10Y	Since Apr 2007	Volatility	Sharpe	Sortino	Max drawdown
BND	0.38%	3.34%	4.07%	-0.05%	1.41%	3.02%	5.3%	-0.09	-0.13	-5.9%
LQD	0.12%	3.17%	4.66%	-0.44%	2.23%	4.10%	7.3%	0.01	0.02	-8.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Apr 2007” measures every fund from April 10, 2007 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

LQD offers the higher yield at 4.21% vs 4.01% for BND. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BND is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.14%.

They track different benchmarks: BND is linked to Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index while LQD tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

BND is the larger fund by assets ($158B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BND would generate roughly $33.42/month, while LQD would produce $35.08/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

BND yield4.01%

LQD yield4.21%

Monthly diff on $10K$1.67

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BND would cost approximately $30 in fees vs $140 for LQD (simplified, not compounded). The $110.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BND ER0.03%

LQD ER0.14%

Strategy & risk

BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index with a bonds approach, while LQD tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index with a bonds approach. Beta is 0.98 for BND and 1.33 for LQD, indicating BND is less volatile relative to the market.

BND beta0.98

LQD beta1.33

Fund details

BND is managed by Vanguard (launched 04/03/2007) with $158B in assets. LQD is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $29.2B in assets.

BND AUM$158B

LQD AUM$29.2B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is BND or LQD better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. LQD currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BND and LQD?

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index with a bonds approach, while LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index with a bonds approach. They are issued by Vanguard and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both BND and LQD?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BND or LQD?

BND has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LQD charges 0.14%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BND vs LQD generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BND would generate roughly $33.42 per month ($401.00 annually). The same in LQD would produce about $35.08 per month ($421.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BND or LQD?

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BND with

People also compare LQD with

Popular comparisons

BND vs LQD — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BND and LQD are both investment-grade bond ETFs tracking index strategies, but they differ fundamentally in scope. BND holds the full U.S. bond market—Treasuries, agencies, corporate bonds, and mortgage-backed securities—via the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. LQD focuses exclusively on investment-grade corporate bonds through the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index. That focus difference drives their yield, risk profile, and interest-rate sensitivity.

How they differ

The biggest distinction is breadth: BND is a total-market bond fund capturing everything from government securities to corporates, while LQD zeroes in on corporate bonds alone. This shows up in yield—LQD's 4.53% distribution rate reflects the higher coupons on corporates, versus BND's 4.03% blended across all bond types.

Interest-rate sensitivity differs sharply. LQD's beta of 1.33 means it swings harder than the broad bond market when rates move; BND's 0.98 beta tracks closer to the overall market. Expense ratios reflect scale: BND's 0.03% fee is nearly five times cheaper than LQD's 0.14%, partly owing to BND's $158B in assets versus LQD's $29.2B.

Credit risk is the third key difference. BND's Treasury and agency holdings act as a ballast; LQD carries pure corporate credit exposure, so widening credit spreads or a recession hitting corporate earnings directly pressures its NAV.

Who each is best for

BND: Fits investors seeking a simple, low-cost core bond holding with minimal credit risk and broad diversification across the U.S. fixed-income market—especially those who want to reduce sensitivity to corporate earnings cycles.

LQD: Designed for investors comfortable with corporate-credit exposure who want to capture the yield premium corporates offer over Treasuries and are willing to accept higher interest-rate volatility in exchange.

Key risks to know

Credit spread widening: LQD's pure corporate focus means wider spreads during market stress or economic slowdowns can erode NAV faster than BND, where government holdings provide a hedge. BND's Treasury component limits this downside.

Interest-rate duration risk: LQD's higher beta (1.33 vs. 0.98) signals greater price sensitivity to rate moves. In a rising-rate environment, LQD tends to decline more sharply; in a falling-rate environment, it rebounds harder. BND's lower beta reflects a shorter effective duration, reducing this swing.

Corporate earnings sensitivity: LQD's index concentrates in companies whose bond valuations hinge on operating performance and balance-sheet strength. A sector-wide earnings miss or recession can pressure corporate spreads across the portfolio simultaneously.

Reinvestment risk at low rates: Both funds distribute monthly, so in a low-rate environment, reinvested distributions may earn less than the original coupon, dragging long-term returns.

Bottom line

If you want broad bond-market exposure with minimal credit risk and rock-bottom costs, BND is the natural core holding. If you're comfortable with corporate credit and seeking extra yield, LQD offers a 50-basis-point pickup—but with higher interest-rate and spread volatility. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.