DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BND vs SHY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • BNDInvestors who want higher current income (4.26% vs 3.57% for SHY).
  • SHYInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

BND has lagged SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.04% total return against 1.15%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SHY has compounded at 1.60% a year, against 1.10% for BND. SHY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 1.6% against 5.1% for BND. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Apr 2007Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BND-2.63%-2.04%4.29%-0.71%1.10%2.82%5.1%-0.06-0.08-4.7%
SHY0.15%1.15%3.89%1.68%1.60%1.80%1.6%-0.41-0.58-1.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Apr 2007” measures every fund from April 10, 2007 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricBNDSHY
Full nameVanguard Total Bond Market ETFiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
IssuerVanguardiShares
Underlying indexBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index
Last Close$69.94 as of October 2, 2026$81.05 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate4.26%3.57%
Trailing 12-month yield4.20%3.63%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10095
Safety-Adjusted Yield 4.26%3.39%
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
AUM$162B$26.2B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
ObjectiveTrack the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index for broad U.S. bond exposure.Tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date04/03/200707/22/2002
Beta0.980.22
Last dividend$0.2485 declared, pays 10/05/2026$0.241 declared, pays 10/06/2026
Ex-dividend date10/01/202610/01/2026

Bottom lineChoose BND if you want higher current income (4.26% vs 3.57% for SHY). Choose SHY if you want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4676B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BND.

ETFs466
Total AUM$4683B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SHY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BND offers the higher yield at 4.26% vs 3.57% for SHY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BND is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.15%.

They have different reference exposures: BND is linked to Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index while SHY is linked to ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

BND is the larger fund by assets ($162B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

  • Want higher current income — BND yields 4.26% vs 3.57% for SHY.
  • Want fixed-income ballast that cushions equity drawdowns.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.03% expense ratio vs 0.15% for SHY.

Choose SHY

iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF

  • Want fixed-income ballast that cushions equity drawdowns.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.2 vs 1.0 for BND.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BND would generate roughly $35.50 cash per distribution, while SHY would produce $29.75 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

BND yield4.26%
SHY yield3.57%
Cash diff on $10K$5.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BND would cost approximately $30 in fees vs $150 for SHY (simplified, not compounded). The $120.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BND ER0.03%
SHY ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index with a bonds approach, while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Beta is 0.98 for BND and 0.22 for SHY, making SHY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

BND beta0.98
SHY beta0.22

Fund details

BND is managed by Vanguard (launched 04/03/2007) with $162B in assets. SHY is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $26.2B in assets.

BND AUM$162B
SHY AUM$26.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for BND and SHY?

BND currently distributes 4.26% and SHY 3.57%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is BND or SHY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. BND currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BND and SHY?

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index with a bonds approach, while SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They are issued by Vanguard and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both BND and SHY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is BND or SHY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — BND scores 100, SHY scores 95, so BND's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. SHY has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.22 vs 0.98 for BND). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, BND or SHY?

BND has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SHY charges 0.15%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BND vs SHY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BND would generate roughly $35.50 cash per distribution ($426.00 annually). The same in SHY would produce about $29.75 cash per distribution ($357.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BND or SHY?

BND has lagged SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.04% total return against 1.15%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: SHY has compounded at 1.60% a year, against 1.10% for BND. SHY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 1.6% against 5.1% for BND. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BND vs SHY — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

BND and SHY are both broad-market fixed-income ETFs tracking U.S. government and investment-grade bonds, but they differ sharply in duration and credit composition. BND targets the full Bloomberg Aggregate Index—a mix of Treasuries, investment-grade corporates, and mortgage-backed securities—while SHY focuses exclusively on short-term Treasury securities maturing in one to three years. The difference in maturity profiles and credit risk creates distinct yield and interest-rate sensitivity profiles.

How they differ

The biggest difference is maturity and credit exposure. BND holds a barbell of bonds across all maturities and credit qualities within the investment-grade universe, while SHY is limited to Treasury debt in the one- to three-year bucket. That durational tightness explains why SHY's beta is 0.22, less than one-quarter of BND's 0.98—SHY moves far less when interest rates swing.

Yield follows naturally from that structure. BND offers 4.26%, partly supported by its corporate and MBS holdings, which carry credit spreads above Treasury yields. SHY yields 3.57%, constrained by short-term Treasury rates alone and zero credit risk. Both distribute monthly.

On costs, BND's 0.03% expense ratio undercuts SHY's 0.15% by a meaningful margin, a reflection of BND's much larger $162B asset base. SHY has $26.2B, still substantial but a fraction of BND's scale.

Who each is best for

BND: Fits investors seeking broad fixed-income diversification and willing to accept moderate interest-rate sensitivity in exchange for higher current yield. Works well for those holding bonds as a core ballast to equities and comfortable with exposure to corporate and mortgage credit.

SHY: Fits investors prioritizing capital stability and predictable returns over high income, particularly those who view bonds as a cash substitute or ultra-conservative portfolio anchor. Designed for holders who want to minimize duration risk and accept lower yields in exchange for minimal interest-rate swings.

Key risks to know

  • Interest-rate duration mismatch. BND's 0.98 beta means a 1% rise in rates can erode NAV by roughly 1%. SHY's 0.22 beta limits that loss to about 0.2%, but this tradeoff means BND holders absorb meaningfully more mark-to-market volatility if rates spike.
  • Credit spread compression or widening. BND's corporate and mortgage holdings are sensitive to shifts in risk appetite. A sudden widening of credit spreads—such as during a recession or credit event—can depress BND's price independently of Treasury yields, a risk SHY does not face.
  • Reinvestment timing on short bonds. SHY's one- to three-year maturity horizon means frequent principal paydowns. Rising or falling rates when those bonds mature will affect the yield on reinvested proceeds, creating income variability that longer-duration funds don't experience as acutely.

Bottom line

If you want diversified bond exposure and can tolerate moderate interest-rate swings, BND's broader credit mix and lower costs make it a core holding. If you prioritize stability and don't need high income—or want to keep powder dry for rising-rate environments—SHY's short duration and Treasury purity offer downside cushion. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.