DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BTCI vs IAUI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF and NEOS Gold High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • BTCIInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 26.27%, generated by selling options premium.
  • IAUIInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BTCI has lagged IAUI over the trailing twelve months, posting a -38.84% total return against 19.40%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — IAUI has compounded at 16.56% a year versus -25.77% for BTCI. IAUI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.4% against 40.0% for BTCI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BTCI-23.30%-38.84%-25.77%40.0%-1.34-1.74-48.4%
IAUI-0.54%19.40%16.56%22.4%0.590.79-22.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 5, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricBTCIIAUI
Full nameNEOS Bitcoin High Income ETFNEOS Gold High Income ETF
IssuerNEOSNEOS
Last Close$28.73 as of August 19, 2026$51.43 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield26.27%12.09%
Distribution Safety Score™ 4679
Expense ratio0.98%0.79%
AUM$1.10B$549M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexBitcoin ETPsGold ETPs
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through bitcoin exposure.Seeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through exposure to gold ETPs.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/16/202406/05/2025
Beta1.6764—
Last dividend$0.6289$0.5182
Ex-dividend date08/19/202608/19/2026

Bottom lineChoose BTCI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 26.27%, generated by selling options premium. Choose IAUI if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. There's no free lunch: BTCI's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while IAUI keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. BTCI and IAUI generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.
  • Crypto volatility. BTCI sits on top of crypto-asset prices, which routinely swing far more than equities. A single drawdown can exceed a year of distributions, so income projections deserve extra skepticism here.

Learn the mechanics: Return of capital, explained · NAV erosion, explained

Model this comparison:
Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

NEOS
ETFs19
Total AUM$32.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BTCI and IAUI.

See all NEOS ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BTCI offers the higher yield at 26.27% vs 12.09% for IAUI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

IAUI is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.79% compared to 0.98%.

They track different benchmarks: BTCI is linked to Bitcoin ETPs while IAUI tracks Gold ETPs, which means their performance drivers differ.

BTCI is the larger fund by assets ($1.10B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose BTCI

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — BTCI distributes roughly 26.27% from selling options premium, vs 12.09% for IAUI.
  • Want crypto exposure that pays income rather than waiting on price alone.

Choose IAUI

NEOS Gold High Income ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.79% expense ratio vs 0.98% for BTCI.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BTCI would generate roughly $218.92/month, while IAUI would produce $100.75/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

BTCI yield26.27%
IAUI yield12.09%
Monthly diff on $10K$118.17

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BTCI would cost approximately $980 in fees vs $790 for IAUI (simplified, not compounded). The $190.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BTCI ER0.98%
IAUI ER0.79%

Strategy & risk

BTCI tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach, while IAUI tracks Gold ETPs with a metals approach.

BTCI beta1.6764
IAUI beta—

Fund details

BTCI is managed by NEOS (launched 10/16/2024) with $1.10B in assets. IAUI is managed by NEOS (launched 06/05/2025) with $549M in assets.

BTCI AUM$1.10B
IAUI AUM$549M
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for BTCI and IAUI?

BTCI currently distributes 26.27% and IAUI 12.09%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is BTCI or IAUI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. BTCI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BTCI and IAUI?

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach, while IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) tracks Gold ETPs with a metals approach. They are issued by NEOS and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both BTCI and IAUI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is BTCI or IAUI safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — IAUI scores 79, BTCI scores 46, so IAUI's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, BTCI or IAUI?

BTCI has an expense ratio of 0.98% while IAUI charges 0.79%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BTCI vs IAUI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BTCI would generate roughly $218.92 per month ($2,627.00 annually). The same in IAUI would produce about $100.75 per month ($1,209.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BTCI or IAUI?

BTCI has lagged IAUI over the trailing twelve months, posting a -38.84% total return against 19.40%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — IAUI has compounded at 16.56% a year versus -25.77% for BTCI. IAUI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.4% against 40.0% for BTCI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BTCI vs IAUI — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

BTCI and IAUI are both single-asset covered-call ETFs from NEOS designed to generate high monthly income from bitcoin and gold exposure, respectively. The key difference is their underlying commodity: BTCI writes calls against Bitcoin ETPs to target a 27.62% distribution rate, while IAUI does the same against Gold ETPs for an 11.29% yield. Both use options strategies to boost income but carry very different volatility profiles and risk structures.

How they differ

BTCI's bitcoin exposure means its distribution yield is more than double IAUI's gold yield—27.62% versus 11.29%—a gap that reflects bitcoin's far greater price swings and the premium income investors demand to own volatility. BTCI has a beta of 1.68, indicating it amplifies market moves roughly 70% more than the broad market; IAUI's gold exposure shows zero beta, meaning it moves independently of equities and offers portfolio ballast. On fees, IAUI edges BTCI slightly (0.79% versus 0.98%), though both are reasonable for options-managed strategies. BTCI opened in October 2024 with $1.10B in assets; IAUI is newer, launched in June 2025 with $539M, so BTCI has a longer track record for assessing how its income strategy performs through a full market cycle.

Who each is best for

BTCI: Fits investors seeking maximum current income from a single-commodity bet who can tolerate sharp price swings and understand that covered calls cap upside if bitcoin rallies sharply.

IAUI: Designed for income-focused investors who view gold as either a portfolio stabilizer or an inflation hedge and want monthly distributions without the equity-market correlation that BTCI brings.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yield levels. BTCI's 27.62% annual distribution is nearly three times its underlying commodity's typical annual return range. Over time, this math may require return-of-capital distributions, gradually shrinking NAV relative to the bitcoin price—a structural pressure inherent in yield-on-yield covered-call strategies on volatile assets.
  • Capped upside from call writing. Both funds write covered calls to generate income, meaning if bitcoin or gold rallies sharply, the fund's gains are limited by the strike prices of the calls sold. Investors give up significant appreciation potential in exchange for monthly checks.
  • Bitcoin volatility concentration. BTCI's high beta (1.68) and concentration in a single, notoriously volatile asset create periods of steep NAV drawdowns. A major bitcoin selloff will hit BTCI far harder than traditional equity holdings, even if the covered calls reduce some downside.
  • Gold price stagnation risk. IAUI's 11.29% yield assumes consistent option premium from gold's price action. If gold enters a long quiet period with low implied volatility, call premiums shrink and distributions may fall, leaving investors with neither price appreciation nor the expected income.

Bottom line

If you're chasing maximum monthly income and can weather bitcoin's swings, BTCI's 27.62% yield is hard to ignore; if you prefer income stability and a portfolio hedge that doesn't move with equities, IAUI's lower yield and zero-beta profile may suit you better. Both strategies depend on sustained options premium, so neither is a passive hold—track distributions quarterly to confirm the income source isn't leaning too heavily on NAV depletion. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

How covered-call funds work How to read a fund's stats The covered-call opportunity cost

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener