DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BTCI vs MSTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF and YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs19
Total AUM$25.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for specializing in income-focused ETFs that employ option strategies and enhanced yield mechanisms across equities, fixed income, and alternative assets. The firm operates 19 funds organized around themes including covered call strategies (such as QQQH, SPYH, and QQQI), high-income equity products, hedged equity income, and enhanced fixed income solutions, with notable tickers covering broad market indices and technology-heavy benchmarks. NEOS distinguishes itself through a niche focus on yield enhancement and income generation across diverse asset classes, catering to investors seeking above-market distributions through systematic option writing and alternative income strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BTCI.

ETFs62
Total AUM$9.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax specializes in options-based and income-focused ETFs, leveraging covered call and short option strategies to generate high distribution yields for investors seeking regular income. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 61 ETFs organized across nine fund families, including prominent strategies like 0DTE (zero days-to-expiration) options, covered calls, and target distribution approaches, alongside more traditional performance and portfolio-based offerings. YieldMax's holdings span major technology and financial names—including tickers like AMZY, APLY, BRKC, and FBY—and the firm targets both individual investors and those seeking enhanced yield through systematic options strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY.

Side-by-side snapshot

BTCIMSTY
Full nameNEOS Bitcoin High Income ETFYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerNEOSYieldMax
Last Close$36.07 as of May 20, 2026$23.81 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield26.25%115.42%
Expense ratio0.98%1.03%
AUM$834M$1.2B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
Underlying indexBitcoin ETPsStrategy (MSTR)
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through bitcoin exposure.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/16/202407/18/2023
Last dividend$0.80$0.54
Ex-dividend date04/22/202605/14/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 115.42% vs 26.25% for BTCI. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BTCI is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.98% compared to 1.03%.

They track different benchmarks: BTCI is linked to Bitcoin ETPs while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR), which means their performance drivers differ.

MSTY is the larger fund by assets ($1.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BTCI would generate roughly $218.75/month, while MSTY would produce $961.83/month, at current distribution rates.

BTCI yield26.25%
MSTY yield115.42%
Monthly diff on $10K$743.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BTCI would cost approximately $980 in fees vs $1,030 for MSTY (simplified, not compounded). The $50.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BTCI ER0.98%
MSTY ER1.03%

Strategy & risk

BTCI tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach, while MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR) using a covered call strategy.

Fund details

BTCI is managed by NEOS (launched 10/16/2024) with $834M in assets. MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/18/2023) with $1.2B in assets.

BTCI AUM$834M
MSTY AUM$1.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BTCI or MSTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BTCI and MSTY?

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto strategy, while MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach. They are issued by NEOS and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both BTCI and MSTY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BTCI or MSTY?

BTCI has an expense ratio of 0.98% while MSTY charges 1.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BTCI vs MSTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BTCI would generate roughly $218.75 per month ($2,625.00 annually). The same in MSTY would produce about $961.83 per month ($11,542.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

BTCI vs MSTY — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BTCI and MSTY are both cryptocurrency-linked income ETFs launched within the past two years, but they pursue dramatically different strategies. BTCI holds bitcoin ETPs and generates income through options overlays, targeting a 27.8% distribution rate with monthly payouts. MSTY runs a covered-call strategy exclusively on MicroStrategy (MSTR) stock, a bitcoin-proxy play, and distributes 70.5% of assets annually via weekly payments. The key distinction: BTCI is diversified across the bitcoin market itself; MSTY is a single-stock bet wrapped in an income wrapper.

How they differ

The biggest difference is concentration. MSTY holds only MicroStrategy, a publicly traded bitcoin holding company; BTCI holds a basket of bitcoin ETPs. That alone creates vastly different risk profiles: MSTY's beta is listed as 0.0, which reflects its covered-call overlay but also signals that the fund's price movement is decoupled from traditional market indices—it's tethered entirely to MSTR volatility. BTCI spreads its bitcoin exposure across multiple ETP vehicles.

Second, distribution mechanics differ sharply. MSTY's 70.51% distribution rate is almost 2.5 times BTCI's 27.8%, paid weekly instead of monthly. The SEC 30-day yield on BTCI is only 2.59%, a red flag that the headline 27.8% rate likely includes return-of-capital components or relies heavily on options premium realization. MSTY's much higher stated rate suggests even more aggressive capital return.

Third, both use options but in opposite directions. BTCI writes options on bitcoin holdings to fund income. MSTY sells covered calls on MSTR stock, capping upside if the stock rallies hard. BTCI's 0.98% expense ratio is slightly lower than MSTY's 1.03%, but both are reasonable for active-income strategies.

Who each is best for

BTCI: Investors seeking monthly income with direct bitcoin price exposure, willing to accept potential NAV erosion and tax complexity, and comfortable holding in taxable accounts despite the monthly distributions creating frequent taxable events.

MSTY: Traders and income-focused investors who view MicroStrategy specifically as a bitcoin proxy and prefer weekly cash flow; best suited for those who don't expect MSTR to rally sharply and can tolerate single-stock concentration risk.

Key risks to know

* NAV erosion in both funds. The gap between distribution rate and SEC yield on BTCI (27.8% vs. 2.59%) strongly suggests distributions include return of capital, which erodes share price over time. MSTY's 70.51% rate carries the same structural risk at an even steeper angle.

* Single-stock risk in MSTY. MicroStrategy is a volatile bitcoin-proxy play; a sharp decline in either MSTR or bitcoin will hit MSTY holders hard, with no diversification to cushion the blow.

* Covered-call cap in MSTY. If MicroStrategy rallies sharply, the covered calls will be called away, locking in gains but preventing full upside participation—and potentially creating tax surprises if shares are assigned mid-cycle.

* Recency bias. BTCI has operated for only 15 months; MSTY for less than three years. Neither track record is long enough to assess how these funds perform across a full market cycle or crypto regime change.

* Options liquidity and implied volatility. Both funds depend on the ability to sell options at favorable premiums. If implied volatility on bitcoin or MSTR contracts compresses, both funds' income generation capacity will decline.

Bottom line

BTCI offers bitcoin exposure with a diversified income overlay; MSTY offers concentrated MicroStrategy exposure with aggressive weekly income. If you want direct bitcoin participation and can tolerate monthly distributions, BTCI is more broadly indexed. If you're bullish specifically on MSTR and want weekly cash flow, MSTY could fit—but the 70.5% distribution rate and zero beta suggest significant NAV decay is already priced into the strategy. Neither is a "set and forget" holding; both require active monitoring and clear understanding that recent gains don't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.