ETF Comparison

BTCI vs IBIT: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

NEOS

ETFs19

Total AUM$24.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BTCI.

See all NEOS ETFs

iShares

ETFs481

Total AUM$4451B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IBIT.

See all iShares ETFs

Side-by-side snapshot

	BTCI	IBIT
Full name	NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
Issuer	NEOS	iShares
Last Close	$27.90 as of July 4, 2026	$34.87 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield	28.09%	0.00%
Distribution Safety Score	46	—
Expense ratio	0.98%	0.12%
AUM	$1.09B	$48.6B
Distribution frequency	Monthly	None
Underlying index	Bitcoin ETPs	Bitcoin
Objective	Seeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through bitcoin exposure.	Provide exposure to bitcoin price performance through a physically backed trust structure.
Asset class	Equity	Equity
Inception date	10/16/2024	01/11/2024
Beta	1.6764	1.8887
Last dividend	$0.6530	—
Ex-dividend date	01/21/2026	—

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Build a sample portfolio Forecast income

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BTCI has outpaced IBIT over the trailing twelve months, posting a -37.67% total return against -41.73%. Measured from Oct 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — BTCI has compounded at -4.83% a year versus -4.99% for IBIT. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Symbol	YTD	1Y	Since Oct 2024	Volatility	Sharpe	Sortino	Max drawdown
BTCI	-28.96%	-37.67%	-4.83%	40.2%	-1.29	-1.67	-48.4%
IBIT	-31.55%	-41.73%	-4.99%	44.8%	-1.31	-1.72	-53.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2024” measures every fund from October 17, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BTCI currently shows a 28.09% distribution yield. IBIT has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

IBIT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.12% compared to 0.98%.

They track different benchmarks: BTCI is linked to Bitcoin ETPs while IBIT tracks Bitcoin, which means their performance drivers differ.

IBIT is the larger fund by assets ($48.6B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BTCI would generate roughly $234.08/month, while IBIT has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

BTCI yield28.09%

IBIT yield0.00%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BTCI would cost approximately $980 in fees vs $120 for IBIT (simplified, not compounded). The $860.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BTCI ER0.98%

IBIT ER0.12%

Strategy & risk

BTCI tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach, while IBIT tracks Bitcoin with a crypto approach. Beta is 1.6764 for BTCI and 1.8887 for IBIT, indicating BTCI is less volatile relative to the market.

BTCI beta1.6764

IBIT beta1.8887

Fund details

BTCI is managed by NEOS (launched 10/16/2024) with $1.09B in assets. IBIT is managed by iShares (launched 01/11/2024) with $48.6B in assets.

BTCI AUM$1.09B

IBIT AUM$48.6B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Which of BTCI or IBIT pays more dividend income?

BTCI currently reports a distribution yield, while IBIT has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between BTCI and IBIT?

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) tracks Bitcoin ETPs with a crypto approach, while IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) tracks Bitcoin with a crypto approach. They are issued by NEOS and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both BTCI and IBIT?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BTCI or IBIT?

BTCI has an expense ratio of 0.98% while IBIT charges 0.12%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BTCI vs IBIT generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BTCI would generate roughly $234.08 per month ($2,809.00 annually). IBIT has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, BTCI or IBIT?

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BTCI with

People also compare IBIT with

Popular comparisons

BTCI vs IBIT — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BTCI and IBIT both offer bitcoin exposure through an ETF wrapper, but they pursue fundamentally different strategies. IBIT is a straightforward spot bitcoin trust focused on price appreciation with minimal fees. BTCI overlays options income strategies on bitcoin holdings, targeting 28.09% annualized distributions through monthly payouts. The key distinction: IBIT is passive price exposure; BTCI is an active income-generation vehicle.

How they differ

The biggest difference is strategy. IBIT holds bitcoin directly and distributes nothing—it's designed to track bitcoin's price movement. BTCI holds bitcoin ETPs and systematically sells options against them to generate monthly income, targeting a 28.09% distribution rate. That income strategy carries costs: BTCI's expense ratio is 0.98% versus IBIT's 0.12%, and BTCI's distributions are paid monthly while IBIT pays none. BTCI also trades at a lower price ($27.90 versus $34.87), and has a slightly lower beta (1.6764 versus 1.8887), suggesting its options overlay dampens volatility somewhat. Scale differs too—IBIT holds $48.6B in AUM compared to BTCI's $1.09B, which matters for trading liquidity and fund stability.

Who each is best for

BTCI: Fits investors seeking monthly cash distributions and who believe bitcoin's near-term volatility will sustain a consistent income stream; those comfortable with options-based synthetic income mechanics and willing to accept NAV erosion as the cost of high yield.

IBIT: Fits investors wanting pure bitcoin price exposure without active management or distribution mechanics; those who prefer minimal fees, large fund size, and simplicity, whether they plan to hold long-term or trade tactically.

Key risks to know

NAV erosion at extreme yields. BTCI's 28.09% annualized distribution rate is far above historical bitcoin appreciation—the fund is likely returning capital and eroding NAV over time to sustain those monthly payouts. Investors may receive distributions that include return of principal, shrinking the fund's value per share.

Options and volatility timing risk. BTCI's income depends on selling call options and managing covered-call mechanics. If bitcoin rallies sharply, the options strategy caps upside; if it crashes, the strategy may not protect principal. The timing of option sales relative to volatility spikes directly affects actual yields realized.

Concentration and regulatory risk. Both funds are entirely dependent on bitcoin's regulatory treatment and market structure. A material change in SEC or Treasury stance on digital assets could affect both, but BTCI's options overlay introduces additional complexity to how derivatives regulators view the fund.

Liquidity and tracking differences. BTCI's smaller AUM ($1.09B) and newer inception (October 2024) mean less trading history and potential wider bid-ask spreads. IBIT's $48.6B scale and January 2024 start provide deeper liquidity and longer performance data.

Bottom line

If you want simple bitcoin exposure with minimal friction and fees, IBIT's straightforward spot-bitcoin structure and 0.12% expense ratio stand out. If you prioritize monthly income and believe options overlay can sustainably generate 28.09% yields, BTCI may appeal—but that payout rate warrants scrutiny of how much is capital return versus earnings. Past performance doesn't predict future results; bitcoin's price and volatility are unpredictable, and BTCI's synthetic-income approach has minimal track record.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.