DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

CHPY vs EGGY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF and NestYield Dynamic Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 4, 2026

Best for

  • CHPYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 39.73%, generated by selling options premium.
  • EGGYInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

CHPY has outpaced EGGY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 97.99% total return against 24.53%. Measured from Apr 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — CHPY has compounded at 97.04% a year versus 39.24% for EGGY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Apr 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
CHPY55.14%97.99%97.04%39.3%1.622.34-27.6%
EGGY21.14%24.53%39.24%43.5%0.400.54-33.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 4, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Apr 2025” measures every fund from April 3, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricCHPYEGGY
Full nameYieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETFNestYield Dynamic Income ETF
IssuerYieldMaxNestYield
Last Close$67.15 as of September 4, 2026$33.75 as of September 4, 2026
Distribution rate39.73%35.55%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7979
Safety-Adjusted Yield 31.39%28.08%
Expense ratio1.03%0.92%
AUM$1.17B$168M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyMonthly
Underlying indexBasket (Semiconductor companies)
ObjectiveSeeks weekly income by holding a portfolio of U.S.-listed semiconductor equities and generating premium through an options overlay written on those holdings and on semiconductor ETFs.Actively managed ETF that seeks monthly income by writing covered calls on a concentrated book of U.S. equities.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/02/202512/26/2024
Beta1.86131.6057
Last dividend$0.513$1.00
Ex-dividend date09/02/202608/28/2026

Bottom lineChoose CHPY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 39.73%, generated by selling options premium. Choose EGGY if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. CHPY and EGGY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs61
Total AUM$9.75B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CHPY.

ETFs3
Total AUM$311M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NestYield specializes in income-focused ETF strategies designed to generate regular distributions for investors seeking yield. The company operates a focused lineup of three funds—EGGQ, EGGS, and EGGY—all centered on income generation across different market segments or strategies. NestYield's niche approach emphasizes accessible dividend and yield-oriented portfolios for investors prioritizing cash flow over capital appreciation.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on EGGY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

CHPY offers the higher yield at 39.73% vs 35.55% for EGGY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

EGGY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.92% compared to 1.03%.

CHPY is the larger fund by assets ($1.17B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose CHPY

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — CHPY distributes roughly 39.73% from selling options premium, vs 35.55% for EGGY.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Choose EGGY

NestYield Dynamic Income ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.92% expense ratio vs 1.03% for CHPY.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.6 vs 1.9 for CHPY.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, CHPY would generate roughly $331.08/month, while EGGY would produce $296.25/month, at current distribution rates.

CHPY yield39.73%
EGGY yield35.55%
Monthly diff on $10K$34.83

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, CHPY would cost approximately $1,030 in fees vs $920 for EGGY (simplified, not compounded). The $110.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

CHPY ER1.03%
EGGY ER0.92%

Strategy & risk

CHPY tracks Basket (Semiconductor companies) with a covered call approach, while EGGY is an actively managed ETF built around a derivative overlay strategy. Beta is 1.8613 for CHPY and 1.6057 for EGGY, making EGGY the less volatile of the two by this measure.

CHPY beta1.8613
EGGY beta1.6057

Fund details

CHPY is managed by YieldMax (launched 04/02/2025) with $1.17B in assets. EGGY is managed by NestYield (launched 12/26/2024) with $168M in assets.

CHPY AUM$1.17B
EGGY AUM$168M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for CHPY and EGGY?

CHPY currently distributes 39.73% and EGGY 35.55%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is CHPY or EGGY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. CHPY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between CHPY and EGGY?

CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) tracks Basket (Semiconductor companies) with a covered call approach, while EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) is an actively managed ETF built around a derivative overlay strategy. They are issued by YieldMax and NestYield respectively.

Can I hold both CHPY and EGGY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is CHPY or EGGY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: CHPY scores 79, EGGY scores 79. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. EGGY has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.61 vs 1.86 for CHPY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, CHPY or EGGY?

CHPY has an expense ratio of 1.03% while EGGY charges 0.92%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in CHPY vs EGGY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in CHPY would generate roughly $331.08 per month ($3,973.00 annually). The same in EGGY would produce about $296.25 per month ($3,555.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, CHPY or EGGY?

CHPY has outpaced EGGY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 97.99% total return against 24.53%. Measured from Apr 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — CHPY has compounded at 97.04% a year versus 39.24% for EGGY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare CHPY with

People also compare EGGY with

Popular comparisons

CHPY vs EGGY — at a glance

Generated September 6, 2026.

Overview

CHPY and EGGY are both equity ETFs that generate income through options overlays on U.S. stock holdings, but they differ in underlying focus and distribution cadence. equities, distributing monthly. Both charge fees under 1.1% and target yields above 35%.

How they differ

The biggest difference is CHPY's narrow sector focus: it holds semiconductor equities and writes calls on semiconductor ETFs specifically, whereas EGGY employs active management across a broader equity book. This makes CHPY a thematic bet that amplifies semiconductor exposure — its beta of 1.86 reflects that concentration — while EGGY's beta of 1.61 suggests lower volatility relative to the broader market.

Second, distribution timing and mechanics diverge sharply.

Third, scale and maturity create operational risk. CHPY holds $1.17B in AUM and inception-dated 04/02/2025, while EGGY holds $168M with an inception date of 12/26/2024. Both are newly launched, but CHPY has achieved meaningful institutional adoption; EGGY remains a smaller, earlier-stage vehicle where fee compression or redemption pressures could emerge faster if performance falters.

Who each is best for

  • CHPY: Fits investors with high conviction in semiconductor strength who want concentrated sector exposure paired with consistent weekly income, and who can tolerate elevated volatility (beta 1.86) in exchange for a higher yield floor.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yields. Both funds distribute above 35% annualized; at those rates, NAV likely erodes unless underlying equities deliver offsetting capital gains. CHPY's semiconductor focus narrows the odds of consistent outperformance relative to distributions.
  • Weekly call-writing management risk (CHPY). Rolling short calls every week introduces more opportunities for execution slippage, gap risk at open, and behavioral drift than monthly management. Semiconductor volatility could force CHPY to roll calls at wider strikes or accept assignment frequently.
  • Concentrated portfolio risk (EGGY). Active management across a "concentrated book" means key holding decisions drive returns; EGGY's $168M AUM and 12/26/2024 inception date mean the manager's stock picks have had minimal track record for investors to evaluate.
  • Options expiration and assignment risk. Both ETFs hold equity and write calls, exposing them to assignment during sharp rallies. If held positions are called away, the funds must redeploy capital or hold cash, creating timing friction and potential yield drag.
  • Sector momentum dependency (CHPY). Semiconductors' cyclical nature means CHPY's income relative to NAV depends heavily on sector momentum. A prolonged slowdown in chip demand would compress multiples and call premiums simultaneously, compressing both yield and capital value. Both are young funds with untested track records — neither has weathered a full market cycle — so past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.