Generated August 23, 2026.
Overview
DGRO and VOO are both large-cap U.S. equity ETFs with minimal costs, but they track fundamentally different indexes. DGRO targets companies with histories of growing dividends and low payout ratios, screening out the highest-yielding names. VOO tracks the full S&P 500 with no dividend filter, giving you the broad market at its current weighting. The key distinction: DGRO emphasizes dividend growth and capital discipline; VOO offers pure market-cap exposure.
How they differ
DGRO's biggest difference is its dividend-growth screen. The fund excludes companies in the top decile by yield and requires payout ratios below 75%, tilting its portfolio toward dividend growers rather than high-yield payers. VOO holds all 500 S&P constituents at their index weights, including high yielders, non-payers, and everything in between.
That screening shows in the yield: DGRO pays 1.66% versus VOO's 1.12%, a 54-basis-point spread. DGRO's beta of 0.67 versus VOO's 1.0 reflects this tilt—dividend growers historically move less than the broad market in down cycles, though they may underperform in strong rallies.
Cost and scale are nearly identical. DGRO charges 0.08% and holds $43.8B; VOO charges 0.03% and holds $1038B. Both pay quarterly and have been running for over a decade. The 5-basis-point expense difference is negligible in either direction.
Who each is best for
- DGRO: Fits investors who want higher current income from U.S. equities and prefer companies that reinvest profits rather than pay out most earnings, expecting dividend growth to outpace inflation over time.
- VOO: Fits investors who want pure S&P 500 exposure without tilting toward any style (growth, value, dividend), accepting whatever the current market weights as their equity core.
Key risks to know
- Lower market capture in rallies. DGRO's 0.67 beta means it typically trails VOO when the S&P 500 rallies sharply; if large-cap equities have an extended bull run, DGRO's underweight to momentum and low-yielders could be a relative drag.
- Dividend-screen concentration. DGRO's filter for dividend growers with low payouts naturally concentrates the fund in sectors and business models that fit that profile (mature, cash-generative industrials, utilities, financials). This may create hidden sector concentration risk that isn't obvious from the headline diversification.
- Yield sustainability depends on earnings growth. DGRO's appeal rests on the assumption that dividends will keep rising; if corporate earnings stall or payout discipline weakens, the fund's income may not grow as expected, and capital appreciation could lag.
- Market-cap weighting risk in VOO. VOO's adherence to S&P 500 weighting means it will track the index's concentration in the largest companies; in periods when mega-cap tech struggles, the fund moves with it.
Bottom line
If you want higher current income and prefer companies that grow dividends rather than churn earnings, DGRO's tilt and 1.66% yield stand out. If you want simple S&P 500 exposure at the lowest possible cost and accept whatever the market serves up, VOO's 0.03% expense ratio and $1038B scale are hard to beat. Past performance doesn't predict future results, and both funds' outcomes depend on whether dividend growth or broad market appreciation drives returns ahead.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.