DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DRAM vs SOXQ: Memory or Semiconductor Exposure?

DRAM actively selects global memory-related companies and can use derivatives for exposure. SOXQ tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. SOXQ spans more semiconductor businesses than a memory mandate, but remains a concentrated sector investment rather than a complete technology portfolio.

Data updated September 18, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings.

DRAM has outpaced SOXQ over the shared window since Apr 2026, posting a 114.73% total return against 52.35%. SOXQ has been the steadier holding, though β€” annualized volatility of 54.0% against 91.3% for DRAM. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Apr 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DRAM114.73%91.3%1.772.64-44.4%
SOXQ52.35%54.0%1.612.29-28.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. β€œSince Apr 2026” measures every fund from April 2, 2026 β€” the start of shared available history β€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Apr 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Apr 2026) β€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β€” shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricDRAMSOXQ
Full nameRoundhill Memory ETFInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
IssuerRoundhill InvestmentsInvesco
Last Close$59.61 as of September 18, 2026$93.86 as of September 18, 2026
Distribution rateβ€”0.33%
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ β€”89
Safety-Adjusted Yield β€”0.29%
Expense ratio0.65%0.19%
AUM$25.9B$2.89B
Distribution frequencyNoneQuarterly
Underlying indexβ€”PHLX SOX Semiconductor Sector Index
ObjectiveSeeks capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in the equity securities of memory companies, or in swaps and forward contracts that provide equivalent exposure.Tracks the PHLX SOX Semiconductor Sector Index of US-listed semiconductor companies.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/02/202606/11/2021
Betaβ€”2.27
Last dividendβ€”$0.077
Ex-dividend dateβ€”06/22/2026

β€” Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because DRAM launched April 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: DRAM launched April 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same β€” SOXQ charges 0.19% against 0.65% for DRAM, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

A memory mandate versus a semiconductor index

DRAM actively selects global memory-related companies and can use derivatives for exposure. SOXQ tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. SOXQ spans more semiconductor businesses than a memory mandate, but remains a concentrated sector investment rather than a complete technology portfolio.

DRAMSOXQ
ApproachActive global memory-related exposurePHLX semiconductor index
Risk reviewMemory-cycle, company, foreign-market, and derivative risksSemiconductor-cycle, index concentration, and equity risks
Expense ratio0.65%0.19%
Portfolio fitReview combined holdings and weightsReview combined holdings and weights

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs56
Total AUM$37.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DRAM.

ETFs246
Total AUM$980B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major ETF provider known for offering a comprehensive lineup spanning multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company specializes in income-focused products including dividend, covered call, and bond strategies, while also maintaining broad exposure across equity, factor-based, thematic, and ESG investing themes. Invesco's portfolio ranges from index-tracking funds to alternatives and specialized offerings like digital assets and BulletShares, making it one of the more expansive ETF families available to investors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SOXQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SOXQ currently shows a 0.33% distribution yield. DRAM has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

SOXQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.19% compared to 0.65%.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DRAM has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while SOXQ would produce $2.75/month, at current distribution rates.

DRAM yieldβ€”
SOXQ yield0.33%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DRAM would cost approximately $650 in fees vs $190 for SOXQ (simplified, not compounded). The $460.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DRAM ER0.65%
SOXQ ER0.19%

Strategy & risk

DRAM actively selects global memory-related companies and can use derivatives for exposure. SOXQ tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. SOXQ spans more semiconductor businesses than a memory mandate, but remains a concentrated sector investment rather than a complete technology portfolio. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection.

DRAM betaβ€”
SOXQ beta2.27

Fund details

DRAM is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 04/02/2026) with $25.9B in assets. SOXQ is managed by Invesco (launched 06/11/2021) with $2.89B in assets.

DRAM AUM$25.9B
SOXQ AUM$2.89B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Does DRAM's short distribution history mean it never pays income?

No. Roundhill lists an annual distribution frequency for DRAM. That does not promise a payment or establish a recurring yield. Review declared distributions and current holdings separately; neither fund's payout history determines how well it represents your intended semiconductor exposure.

How should I compare risk and ownership costs?

Use matching dates and definitions for returns, distributions, and fees. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection. Check current bid-ask spreads and premiums or discounts; AUM alone does not determine the price available for your order.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.