DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

FBYY vs META: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF and Meta Platforms, Inc. covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 8, 2026

Best for

  • FBYYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 29.15%, generated by selling options premium.
  • METAInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

ETFs92
Total AUM$11.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on FBYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

FBYYMETA
Full nameGraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETFMeta Platforms, Inc.
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$11.01 as of August 8, 2026$592.10 as of August 8, 2026
Distribution yield29.15%0.36%
Distribution Safety Score™ 48100
Expense ratio1.07%
AUM$220,831
Distribution frequencyWeeklyQuarterly
Underlying indexMeta (META)
ObjectiveSeeks to provide weekly income through selling near-the-money put spreads on leveraged ETFs linked to Meta Platforms, with built-in risk control through the put spread collar structure.Operates social networking platforms including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger. Invests in augmented and virtual reality through Reality Labs division.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/21/2025N/A
Beta1.03551.243
Last dividend$0.0617$0.5250
Ex-dividend date08/07/202606/15/2026

Bottom lineChoose FBYY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 29.15%, generated by selling options premium. Choose META if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. There's no free lunch: FBYY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while META keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

FBYY has lagged META over the year to date, posting a -27.67% total return against -8.80%. FBYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 23.4% against 41.7% for META. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Oct 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
FBYY-27.67%-37.01%23.4%-2.69-3.02-41.0%
META-8.80%-19.04%41.7%-0.75-1.01-29.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2025” measures every fund from October 21, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Oct 2025. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Oct 2025) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

FBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF) is an ETF, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock — they take fundamentally different approaches.

FBYY offers the higher yield at 29.15% vs 0.36% for META. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, FBYY would generate roughly $242.92/month, while META would produce $3.00/month, at current distribution rates.

FBYY yield29.15%
META yield0.36%
Monthly diff on $10K$239.92

Cost & efficiency

FBYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio — roughly $1,070 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). META is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

FBYY ER1.07%

Strategy & risk

FBYY tracks Meta (META), while META is a stock. Beta is 1.0355 for FBYY and 1.243 for META, indicating FBYY is less volatile relative to the market.

FBYY beta1.0355
META beta1.243

Security details

FBYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 10/21/2025) with $220,831 in assets. META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock.

FBYY AUM$220,831

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for FBYY and META?

FBYY currently distributes 29.15% and META 0.36%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is FBYY or META better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. FBYY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between FBYY and META?

FBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF) tracks Meta (META), while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. They are issued by GraniteShares and — respectively.

Can I hold both FBYY and META?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, FBYY or META?

FBYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio. META is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in FBYY vs META generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in FBYY would generate roughly $242.92 per month ($2,915.00 annually). The same in META would produce about $3.00 per month ($36.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, FBYY or META?

FBYY has lagged META over the year to date, posting a -27.67% total return against -8.80%. FBYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 23.4% against 41.7% for META. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

FBYY vs META — at a glance

Generated August 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

FBYY is an options-income ETF that synthetically generates income by selling put spreads on leveraged META exposures, while META is the underlying stock itself. The key distinction: FBYY seeks weekly distributions of nearly 30% annually through derivatives strategies, whereas META is a direct equity holding that returns capital primarily through price appreciation with minimal dividends. They share the same underlying company but operate through entirely different mechanics.

How they differ

FBYY uses options collars to generate income weekly, targeting a 29.15% distribution rate, while META pays a quarterly dividend of just 0.36%. The expense ratio difference is stark—FBYY charges 1.07% annually to manage its options overlay, whereas owning META directly carries no fund fee. FBYY arrived in October 2025 with $220,831 in assets; META has been public since 2012 and operates as a fundamental business. The beta figures hint at the leverage embedded in FBYY's strategy: its 1.0355 beta suggests near-market correlation amplified by the put-spread mechanism, while META's 1.243 beta reflects the stock's own market sensitivity as a large-cap growth name.

Who each is best for

FBYY: Fits investors with short time horizons who prioritize weekly cash flow over capital preservation and can tolerate frequent NAV swings tied to options expiration cycles and implied volatility shifts.

META: Fits investors seeking long-term equity exposure to a dominant social-media and emerging-reality-tech business, with modest current dividend yield and return expectations driven primarily by earnings growth and reinvestment.

Key risks to know

  • Synthetic income and NAV erosion: FBYY's 29.15% distribution rate far exceeds plausible underlying returns from the META holding. This gap is likely closed through return-of-capital distributions and NAV decay, which may accelerate if implied volatility contracts or put spreads compress in value.
  • Options expiration and volatility risk: Weekly distributions depend on the premium captured from selling puts. Sharp rallies in META stock narrow the collar and reduce premium income; sharp declines test the short-put floor and can force assignment or force the fund into losing positions.
  • Limited track record and liquidity: FBYY's $220,831 in assets and October 2025 inception date mean the fund has operated through less than one full market cycle. Its narrow asset base and tight spreads may make large redemptions difficult without slippage.
  • META concentration: Both securities are tethered to a single stock. FBYY's leveraged put structure amplifies META's business risk—regulatory pressure on Meta's platforms, advertising-market weakness, or Reality Labs losses hit FBYY faster and harder than the stock alone.
  • Beta amplification: FBYY's beta of 1.0355 paired with options leverage suggests downside moves may exceed META's direct stock beta of 1.243, particularly if put spreads blow through the floor.

Bottom line

If you want weekly income from META exposure and accept NAV erosion as the price, FBYY offers a structured income vehicle; if you want to own META's business fundamentals with minimal fees and patience for long-term appreciation, the stock itself is the straightforward choice. FBYY's distribution rate is engineered income, not sustainable earnings yield—verify whether return-of-capital fits your tax situation and total-return expectations before committing.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.