DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

FDRXX vs SGOV: Which Cash Vehicle Fits Your Account?

A head-to-head comparison of Fidelity Government Cash Reserves and the iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF covering yield, state-tax treatment, and how each handles idle cash.

Data updated August 14, 2026

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricFDRXXSGOV
Full nameFidelity Government Cash ReservesiShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
IssuerFidelity InvestmentsiShares
Last Close$1.00 as of August 14, 2026$100.56 as of August 14, 2026
Distribution yield3.43%3.66%
Distribution Safety Score™ 73
Expense ratio0.09%
AUM$103B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index
ObjectiveSeeks as high a level of current income as is consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Invests at least 99.5% of total assets in cash, U.S. Government securities, and/or repurchase agreements collateralized fully by U.S. Government securities or cash. A common sweep-fund option for Fidelity retirement and brokerage accounts.Seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury obligations maturing in three months or less, investing at least 90% of assets in U.S. Treasury securities.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date05/01/197905/26/2020
Beta0.0069-0.0029
Last dividend$0.0029$0.3070
Ex-dividend date07/31/202608/03/2026

Bottom lineFDRXX and SGOV are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar government money market exposure with very similar cost and risk. Expense-ratio data isn't available for a clean cost comparison, so weigh yield, strategy, and track record instead.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

ETFs473
Total AUM$4718B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SGOV.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

FDRXX has lagged SGOV over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.62% total return against 3.87%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: SGOV has compounded at 3.69% a year, against 3.41% for FDRXX. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 1.2% for FDRXX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5YSince May 2020Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
FDRXX1.97%3.62%4.37%3.41%2.74%1.2%-0.18-0.770.0%
SGOV2.24%3.87%4.63%3.69%2.97%0.2%0.190.31-0.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 14, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2020” measures every fund from May 28, 2020 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

FDRXX (Fidelity Government Cash Reserves) is a money market fund, while SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

SGOV offers the higher yield at 3.66% vs 3.43% for FDRXX. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, FDRXX would generate roughly $28.58/month, while SGOV would produce $30.50/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

FDRXX yield3.43%
SGOV yield3.66%
Monthly diff on $10K$1.92

Cost & efficiency

SGOV charges a 0.09% expense ratio — roughly $90 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). FDRXX has not published an expense ratio, so a direct cost comparison isn't possible.

SGOV ER0.09%

Strategy & risk

FDRXX is a money market fund, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index with a bonds approach. Beta is 0.0069 for FDRXX and -0.0029 for SGOV, indicating SGOV is less volatile relative to the market.

FDRXX beta0.0069
SGOV beta-0.0029

Fund details

FDRXX is managed by Fidelity Investments (launched 05/01/1979). SGOV is managed by iShares (launched 05/26/2020) with $103B in assets.

SGOV AUM$103B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for FDRXX and SGOV?

FDRXX currently distributes 3.43% and SGOV 3.66%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is FDRXX or SGOV better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SGOV currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between FDRXX and SGOV?

FDRXX (Fidelity Government Cash Reserves) is a money market fund, while SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index with a bonds approach. They are issued by Fidelity Investments and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both FDRXX and SGOV?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, FDRXX or SGOV?

SGOV charges a 0.09% expense ratio. FDRXX has not published an expense ratio, so a direct fee comparison isn't possible.

How much income does $10,000 in FDRXX vs SGOV generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in FDRXX would generate roughly $28.58 per month ($343.00 annually). The same in SGOV would produce about $30.50 per month ($366.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, FDRXX or SGOV?

FDRXX has lagged SGOV over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.62% total return against 3.87%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: SGOV has compounded at 3.69% a year, against 3.41% for FDRXX. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 1.2% for FDRXX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

FDRXX vs SGOV — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

FDRXX and SGOV are both ultra-short-duration fixed-income vehicles offering liquidity and monthly income from U.S. government exposure. FDRXX is a money market fund that invests in government securities and repurchase agreements, while SGOV is an ETF tracking an index of Treasury bills maturing within three months. The key distinction: FDRXX targets maximum stability with a $1.00 NAV and monthly sweep utility for Fidelity account holders, whereas SGOV trades at market price and offers broader access to a similar yield with a transparent index methodology.

How they differ

FDRXX's structural advantage is its fixed $1.00 NAV and sweep-fund integration within Fidelity platforms, making it a default cash parking tool. SGOV, by contrast, trades like a regular ETF—its NAV floats with Treasury valuations (currently $100.56 per share), so it can experience small price appreciation or decline. The yield difference is modest: SGOV's 3.66% distribution rate slightly edges FDRXX's 3.43%, though SGOV charges a 0.07% expense ratio that reduces net income. SGOV's assets under management of $99.9B dwarf typical money market fund size, reflecting its accessibility to non-Fidelity investors and institutional cash managers. Both carry minimal interest-rate risk given their three-month or shorter maturity profiles, though SGOV will see larger NAV swings if Treasury yields shift sharply, while FDRXX's $1.00 peg isolates investors from mark-to-market moves.

Who each is best for

FDRXX: Fidelity account holders seeking a frictionless, stable-value sweep vehicle for cash allocations between stock and bond purchases, or investors prioritizing capital preservation and liquidity over yield optimization.

SGOV: Investors with brokerage accounts at any custodian who want transparent index-based Treasury exposure, are comfortable with floating NAV, and prefer lower counterparty risk versus repo-collateralized vehicles, or those using short-duration Treasuries as part of a deliberate laddered strategy.

Key risks to know

  • NAV volatility in SGOV: Unlike FDRXX's fixed $1.00 NAV, SGOV's price moves with Treasury valuations. A 25-basis-point rate rise would depresses its NAV by roughly 0.25%, a meaningful headwind if the position is sold near-term rather than held to maturity.
  • Opportunity cost of FDRXX's sweep function: FDRXX's $1.00 NAV stability comes at the cost of zero price appreciation and tighter repo yields during periods of inverted rate curves or Fed policy shifts, potentially leaving yield-conscious investors in a lower-income position than shorter-duration alternatives.
  • Concentration in Treasury supply: Both funds track government debt; a significant fiscal consolidation or Treasury issuance contraction could impair relative yields. This is not a credit risk, but a structural market risk both share.
  • Reinvestment timing in monthly distributions: Monthly payouts force reinvestment decisions; investors capturing higher yields during rate peaks must then reinvest at potentially lower rates in subsequent months.

Bottom line

FDRXX's strength lies in its simplicity and seamless Fidelity integration; SGOV's edge is accessibility, transparency, and a marginally higher yield without custodian lock-in. If stability and ease matter most, FDRXX delivers; if you prioritize index clarity and platform independence, SGOV offers similar yields with tradeable flexibility. Past performance in these ultra-short vehicles offers little insight into future Fed policy or Treasury supply dynamics.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.