DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SGOV vs SHY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs481
Total AUM$4451B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SGOV and SHY.

Side-by-side snapshot

SGOVSHY
Full nameiShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETFiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
Last Close$100.44 as of July 4, 2026$81.94 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield3.54%3.49%
Distribution Safety Score7170
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
AUM$95.2B$25.3B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities IndexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index
ObjectiveTreasury BondTracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date05/26/202007/22/2002
Beta-0.00290.23
Last dividend$0.2960$0.2383
Ex-dividend date08/03/202608/03/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

SGOV has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.33% total return against 2.37%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: SGOV has compounded at 3.48% a year, against 1.68% for SHY. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.7% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3Y5YSince May 2020Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
SGOV1.20%3.33%4.48%3.48%2.86%0.3%-0.31-0.37-0.3%
SHY0.05%2.37%4.08%1.68%1.37%1.7%-0.28-0.40-1.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2020” measures every fund from May 28, 2020 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) and SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SGOV offers the higher yield at 3.54% vs 3.49% for SHY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SGOV is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.07% compared to 0.15%.

They track different benchmarks: SGOV is linked to ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SGOV is the larger fund by assets ($95.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, SGOV would generate roughly $29.50/month, while SHY would produce $29.08/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

SGOV yield3.54%
SHY yield3.49%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, SGOV would cost approximately $70 in fees vs $150 for SHY (simplified, not compounded). The $80.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

SGOV ER0.07%
SHY ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index with a treasury bond approach, while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index with a basket approach. Beta is -0.0029 for SGOV and 0.23 for SHY, indicating SGOV is less volatile relative to the market.

SGOV beta-0.0029
SHY beta0.23

Fund details

SGOV is managed by iShares (launched 05/26/2020) with $95.2B in assets. SHY is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $25.3B in assets.

SGOV AUM$95.2B
SHY AUM$25.3B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is SGOV or SHY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SGOV currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between SGOV and SHY?

SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index with a treasury bond approach, while SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index with a basket approach. They are issued by iShares and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both SGOV and SHY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, SGOV or SHY?

SGOV has an expense ratio of 0.07% while SHY charges 0.15%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in SGOV vs SHY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in SGOV would generate roughly $29.50 per month ($354.00 annually). The same in SHY would produce about $29.08 per month ($349.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, SGOV or SHY?

SGOV has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.33% total return against 2.37%. The lead holds up over 5 years too: SGOV has compounded at 3.48% a year, against 1.68% for SHY. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.7% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

SGOV vs SHY — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

SGOV and SHY are both iShares Treasury ETFs that track different segments of the U.S. Treasury yield curve. SGOV holds bills maturing in 0–3 months and yields 3.57%, while SHY extends that window to 1–3 year bonds at 3.55%. The core difference is maturity risk: SGOV sits near cash with minimal interest-rate sensitivity, whereas SHY carries modest duration exposure that rises and falls with longer-term Treasury moves.

How they differ

SGOV's 0–3 month maturity window makes it functionally a cash-equivalent holding—its beta of -0.0029 confirms near-zero price sensitivity to equity or rate swings. SHY, by contrast, has a beta of 0.23, meaning its price moves modestly when Treasury yields shift; a 1% rate rise will dent its NAV slightly more than SGOV's. On yield, both offer similar distribution rates (3.57% vs. 3.55%), so the real draw isn't extra income—it's the duration tradeoff. SGOV's expense ratio of 0.07% undercuts SHY's 0.15%, though the larger difference is AUM: SGOV's $95.2B dwarfs SHY's $25.3B, reflecting its appeal as a Treasury cash substitute. SHY has the longer track record (inception July 2002 vs. May 2020) but less institutional asset backing.

Who each is best for

SGOV: Fits investors treating Treasury exposure as a liquid holding place for cash reserves, especially those indifferent to capturing longer-dated Treasury yields and unwilling to accept even modest rate-induced price swings.

SHY: Designed for investors seeking a slightly higher yield than money-market funds or SGOV while accepting modest duration risk—useful for laddered bond portfolios or as a core short-duration holding in a fixed-income sleeve.

Key risks to know

  • Duration and rising-rate risk (SHY): A meaningful increase in 1–3 year Treasury yields will erode SHY's NAV; SGOV's near-zero beta means this risk barely applies to it. Investors holding SHY through a period of rising rates will see temporary principal losses.
  • Reinvestment-rate pressure on SGOV: Because SGOV rolls bills every few weeks, falling short-term rates will compress its yield faster than SHY's. If the Fed cuts, SGOV holders may see distribution rates drop sharply within months.
  • Liquidity and spread risk (SHY): Though liquid, SHY's smaller AUM means wider bid-ask spreads in fast markets; SGOV's $95.2B asset base gives it tighter execution costs.
  • Credit risk (minimal but present): Both hold only Treasury securities backed by the U.S. government, but SGOV's shorter maturity means less embedded credit-risk premium; SHY's 1–3 year bonds carry a hair more yield pickup for that reason.

Bottom line

If you need a parking place for cash that earns a government-backed yield with zero interest-rate risk, SGOV's scale and near-zero beta make it the natural default. If you're willing to tolerate modest NAV swings in exchange for a bit of extra yield and slightly longer maturity, SHY fits investors building a dedicated short-duration bond position. Both carry minimal credit risk; the choice hinges on how much rate sensitivity you'll tolerate and whether you prioritize ultra-low fees and liquidity over a fractionally longer maturit curve.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.