DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IJR vs VB: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and Vanguard Small Cap ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Best for

  • IJRInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • VBInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIJRVB
Full nameiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETFVanguard Small Cap ETF
IssueriSharesVanguard
Last Close$149.04 as of August 13, 2026$307.12 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield1.16%1.16%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7095
Expense ratio0.06%0.05%
AUM$113B$82.5B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexS&P SmallCap 600 IndexCRSP US Small Cap Index
ObjectiveProvide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/22/200001/26/2004
Beta1.071.1
Last dividend$0.4330$0.8920
Ex-dividend date06/15/202606/26/2026

Bottom lineChoose IJR if you want broad equity exposure. Choose VB if you want broad equity exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs469
Total AUM$4661B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IJR.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4657B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VB.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IJR has outpaced VB over the trailing twelve months, posting a 36.25% total return against 29.99%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — VB has compounded at 11.33% a year, ahead of IJR at 10.94%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Jan 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IJR23.36%36.25%15.47%7.50%10.94%10.06%20.2%0.490.73-28.0%
VB18.22%29.99%16.68%8.05%11.33%10.05%18.9%0.580.84-25.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2004” measures every fund from January 30, 2004 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small Cap ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VB is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.05% compared to 0.06%.

They track different benchmarks: IJR is linked to S&P SmallCap 600 Index while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

IJR is the larger fund by assets ($113B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IJR would generate roughly $9.67/month, while VB would produce $9.67/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

IJR yield1.16%
VB yield1.16%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IJR would cost approximately $60 in fees vs $50 for VB (simplified, not compounded). The $10.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

IJR ER0.06%
VB ER0.05%

Strategy & risk

IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index with an index approach, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index with an index approach. Beta is 1.07 for IJR and 1.1 for VB, indicating IJR is less volatile relative to the market.

IJR beta1.07
VB beta1.1

Fund details

IJR is managed by iShares (launched 05/22/2000) with $113B in assets. VB is managed by Vanguard (launched 01/26/2004) with $82.5B in assets.

IJR AUM$113B
VB AUM$82.5B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for IJR and VB?

IJR currently distributes 1.16% and VB 1.16%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is IJR or VB better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. IJR currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IJR and VB?

IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index with an index approach, while VB (Vanguard Small Cap ETF) tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index with an index approach. They are issued by iShares and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both IJR and VB?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is IJR or VB safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — VB scores 95, IJR scores 70, so VB's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, IJR or VB?

IJR has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VB charges 0.05%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in IJR vs VB generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IJR would generate roughly $9.67 per month ($116.00 annually). The same in VB would produce about $9.67 per month ($116.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IJR or VB?

IJR has outpaced VB over the trailing twelve months, posting a 36.25% total return against 29.99%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — VB has compounded at 11.33% a year, ahead of IJR at 10.94%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare VB with

Popular comparisons

IJR vs VB — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

IJR and VB are both broad-market small-cap ETFs tracking different U.S. small-cap indexes. IJR follows the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VB tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Index. The key difference is their constituent selection: the S&P 600 is a fixed 600-stock list, while the CRSP small-cap universe is larger and more dynamic, making VB slightly broader in scope and potentially more inclusive of the smallest tradable stocks.

How they differ

The biggest difference is index construction. IJR's S&P SmallCap 600 is a fixed-count index that excludes smaller stocks below its floor, while VB's CRSP index is based on market-cap breakpoints and captures a wider range of small-cap names. That affects portfolio turnover and which exact small-cap exposures you get.

Both charge minimal fees—VB edges IJR at 0.05% versus 0.06% annually—and both distribute quarterly. Yields are nearly identical at 1.17% for VB and 1.16% for IJR. IJR is the larger fund by AUM ($113B vs. $82.5B) and has a slightly longer track record, having launched in 2000 versus VB's 2004 inception. Beta is similarly tight: IJR at 1.08 and VB at 1.10, both tracking small-cap market movements closely.

Who each is best for

IJR: Fits investors who prefer the simplicity and predictability of a fixed 600-stock index and want the option of the largest small-cap ETF by assets under management.

VB: Fits investors who want exposure to a broader definition of the small-cap universe, including stocks below the S&P 600's floor, and slightly favor the lowest expense ratio available in this category.

Key risks to know

  • Index methodology overlap. Both indexes capture U.S. small-caps, but their constituent lists differ materially. An investor holding both would have meaningful overlap in holdings; verify the specific names to understand true diversification benefit.
  • Small-cap liquidity and volatility. Both funds hold stocks with lower trading volumes and market caps than large-cap peers, making them more susceptible to bid-ask spreads and price swings during market stress.
  • Beta and factor tilts. IJR and VB exhibit betas above 1.0 (1.08 and 1.10 respectively), meaning they amplify broad market moves. Small-cap indexes also carry embedded tilts toward value, profitability, and lower volatility factors relative to the overall market.
  • Sector and style drift. The S&P 600 and CRSP indexes rebalance differently, which can lead to divergent sector weightings and growth/value tilts over time, creating periods of outperformance and underperformance between the two.
  • Turnover and tax drag. The CRSP index has higher turnover due to its market-cap weighting methodology, which may create more taxable gains in VB; IJR's fixed 600-stock structure typically produces lower turnover.

Bottom line

If you prioritize the largest pool of assets and a locked, predictable constituent list, IJR offers a straightforward choice; if you want marginally lower costs and exposure to a broader small-cap universe, VB's CRSP methodology stands out. Either way, you're paying single-digit basis points for core small-cap exposure—the difference in fees and yields won't drive your decision. Verify the holdings overlap and consider your tax situation, since turnover differences may matter in taxable accounts. Past performance of either index does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.