DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IVE vs VTV: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares S&P 500 Value ETF and Vanguard Value ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Best for

  • IVEInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • VTVInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIVEVTV
Full nameiShares S&P 500 Value ETFVanguard Value ETF
IssueriSharesVanguard
Last Close$236.60 as of August 13, 2026$226.29 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield1.52%1.91%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9997
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
AUM$49.8B$191B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexS&P 500 Value IndexCRSP US Large Cap Value Index
ObjectiveProvide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/22/200001/26/2004
Beta0.780.68
Last dividend$0.8990$1.0820
Ex-dividend date06/15/202606/26/2026

Bottom lineChoose IVE if you want broad equity exposure. Choose VTV if you want broad equity exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs469
Total AUM$4661B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IVE.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4657B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VTV.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IVE has lagged VTV over the trailing twelve months, posting a 21.27% total return against 30.05%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VTV has compounded at 12.70% a year, against 11.81% for IVE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Jan 2004Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IVE12.05%21.27%15.22%11.38%11.81%8.99%12.5%0.781.11-17.6%
VTV18.59%30.05%18.63%12.41%12.70%9.81%12.3%1.031.49-14.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2004” measures every fund from January 30, 2004 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

IVE (iShares S&P 500 Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VTV offers the higher yield at 1.91% vs 1.52% for IVE. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VTV is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.18%.

They track different benchmarks: IVE is linked to S&P 500 Value Index while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VTV is the larger fund by assets ($191B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IVE would generate roughly $12.67/month, while VTV would produce $15.92/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

IVE yield1.52%
VTV yield1.91%
Monthly diff on $10K$3.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IVE would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $30 for VTV (simplified, not compounded). The $150.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

IVE ER0.18%
VTV ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

IVE tracks S&P 500 Value Index with an index approach, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index with an index approach. Beta is 0.78 for IVE and 0.68 for VTV, indicating VTV is less volatile relative to the market.

IVE beta0.78
VTV beta0.68

Fund details

IVE is managed by iShares (launched 05/22/2000) with $49.8B in assets. VTV is managed by Vanguard (launched 01/26/2004) with $191B in assets.

IVE AUM$49.8B
VTV AUM$191B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for IVE and VTV?

IVE currently distributes 1.52% and VTV 1.91%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is IVE or VTV better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. VTV currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IVE and VTV?

IVE (iShares S&P 500 Value ETF) tracks S&P 500 Value Index with an index approach, while VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index with an index approach. They are issued by iShares and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both IVE and VTV?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is IVE or VTV safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: IVE scores 99, VTV scores 97. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, IVE or VTV?

IVE has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTV charges 0.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in IVE vs VTV generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IVE would generate roughly $12.67 per month ($152.00 annually). The same in VTV would produce about $15.92 per month ($191.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IVE or VTV?

IVE has lagged VTV over the trailing twelve months, posting a 21.27% total return against 30.05%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VTV has compounded at 12.70% a year, against 11.81% for IVE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare IVE with

People also compare VTV with

Popular comparisons

IVE vs VTV — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

IVE and VTV are both large-cap value ETFs tracking different underlying value indexes. The core difference: IVE follows the S&P 500 Value Index while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both offer quarterly distributions and low fees, but they differ in index construction, yield, and cost structure.

How they differ

VTV's index methodology is the biggest structural difference. The CRSP US Large Cap Value Index uses a broader definition of value and includes more constituents than the S&P 500 Value Index, which can affect concentration and sector tilt. VTV charges 0.03% while IVE costs 0.18%—a gap that compounds over decades. VTV yields 1.93% versus IVE's 1.53%, reflecting different valuation and dividend profiles in their respective indexes. VTV also holds $191B in assets compared to IVE's $49.8B, meaning tighter bid-ask spreads and deeper liquidity in VTV. IVE has a higher beta of 0.79 versus VTV's 0.69, suggesting IVE's holdings may move more with broad market swings.

Who each is best for

IVE: Fits investors who want exposure specifically to the S&P 500 Value Index and are comfortable with a slightly higher cost structure in exchange for a focused large-cap value holding.

VTV: Fits investors seeking broad large-cap value exposure at minimal cost and who value the largest possible asset base for execution efficiency and tight spreads.

Key risks to know

  • Index methodology mismatch. IVE and VTV track different value indexes with different constituent selections and weightings. Overlapping holdings may reduce diversification benefit if held together; verify the holdings overlap before combining them.
  • Value style concentration risk. Both funds concentrate in economically sensitive sectors and value-oriented companies, leaving them more vulnerable to growth-favoring market rotations or recession-driven selloffs in cyclical stocks.
  • Rising-rate sensitivity. Value stocks held in both funds benefit when interest rates climb but can underperform in falling-rate environments, particularly relative to growth-weighted alternatives.
  • Dividend sustainability in downturns. Both funds' yields depend on dividends from large-cap companies; in severe recessions, dividend cuts could compress distributions and trigger NAV declines simultaneously.

Bottom line

If you prioritize cost and maximum asset scale, VTV's 0.03% expense ratio and $191B in AUM stand out; if you're committed to S&P 500 Value Index exposure specifically, IVE delivers that focus despite higher fees. Both are liquid, low-cost ways to access large-cap value; the choice hinges on whether index purity or cost efficiency matters more to your plan. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.