DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

IYRI vs O: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF and Realty Income Corporation covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • IYRIInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 10.80%, generated by selling options premium.
  • OInvestors who want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IYRI has lagged O over the trailing twelve months, posting a 10.52% total return against 14.27%. Measured from Jan 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — O has compounded at 17.11% a year versus 10.28% for IYRI. IYRI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 10.7% against 16.5% for O. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Jan 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IYRI8.34%10.52%10.28%10.7%0.510.72-7.5%
O12.73%14.27%17.11%16.5%0.540.75-11.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 2025” measures every fund from January 15, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIYRIO
Full nameNEOS Real Estate High Income ETFRealty Income Corporation
IssuerNEOSRealty Income
Last Close$49.58 as of August 19, 2026$62.21 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield10.80%5.21%
Distribution Safety Score™ 79100
Expense ratio0.68%
AUM$315M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexDow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income with the potential for equity appreciation.A real estate investment trust that invests in freestanding, single-tenant commercial properties subject to long-term net lease agreements. Known as "The Monthly Dividend Company," Realty Income has a long track record of monthly dividend payments and consistent dividend growth.
Asset classEquityReal Estate
Inception date01/14/2025N/A
Beta0.72
Last dividend$0.4461$0.2710
Ex-dividend date08/19/202607/31/2026

Bottom lineChoose IYRI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 10.80%, generated by selling options premium. Choose O if you want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity. There's no free lunch: IYRI's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while O keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. IYRI generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

ETFs19
Total AUM$32.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IYRI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) is an ETF, while O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust — they take fundamentally different approaches.

IYRI offers the higher yield at 10.80% vs 5.21% for O. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IYRI would generate roughly $90.00/month, while O would produce $43.42/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

IYRI yield10.80%
O yield5.21%
Monthly diff on $10K$46.58

Cost & efficiency

IYRI charges a 0.68% expense ratio — roughly $680 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). O is a real estate investment trust, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

IYRI ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

IYRI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index with an options approach, while O is a real estate investment trust built around net lease REIT exposure.

IYRI beta
O beta0.72

Security details

IYRI is managed by NEOS (launched 01/14/2025) with $315M in assets. O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust.

IYRI AUM$315M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for IYRI and O?

IYRI currently distributes 10.80% and O 5.21%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is IYRI or O better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. IYRI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IYRI and O?

IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index with an options approach, while O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust built around net lease REIT exposure. They are issued by NEOS and Realty Income respectively.

Can I hold both IYRI and O?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is IYRI or O safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — O scores 100, IYRI scores 79, so O's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, IYRI or O?

IYRI charges a 0.68% expense ratio. O is a real estate investment trust, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in IYRI vs O generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IYRI would generate roughly $90.00 per month ($1,080.00 annually). The same in O would produce about $43.42 per month ($521.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IYRI or O?

IYRI has lagged O over the trailing twelve months, posting a 10.52% total return against 14.27%. Measured from Jan 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — O has compounded at 17.11% a year versus 10.28% for IYRI. IYRI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 10.7% against 16.5% for O. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

IYRI vs O — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Overview

IYRI and O both distribute monthly income from real estate exposure, but they use fundamentally different mechanisms. IYRI is an ETF that overlays options strategies on a basket of REITs to amplify yield; O is an operating REIT that owns and manages a portfolio of single-tenant commercial properties and grows its dividend organically. The gap between their distribution rates—10.88% for IYRI versus 5.20% for O—reflects this structural difference.

How they differ

IYRI's strategy relies on selling covered calls and other options on the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index to generate income above the underlying real estate exposure. That overlay approach yields 10.88%, but it caps upside participation and introduces derivative risk. O, by contrast, is a traditional operating REIT with 30 years of history; it distributes cash flow from property rent and has grown its dividend every quarter since inception, yielding 5.20% with potential for further growth.

The second major difference is principal risk. IYRI's beta of 0.0 signals that the options overlay dampens equity volatility, which can seem appealing but typically comes at the cost of capped capital appreciation. O's beta of 0.72 indicates it will move with real estate and equity markets, exposing holders to property value and interest-rate risk—the traditional tradeoff for owning operating assets.

AUM and maturity tell a third story: IYRI launched on January 14, 2025, with $306 million in assets and no track record beyond its first few weeks; O has been operating since October 1994 and has survived multiple real estate cycles and interest-rate regimes. O's dividend growth history and rate-sensitive business make it a bet on sustained property economics; IYRI's yield is tied to how much premium options buyers are willing to pay for REIT call protection.

Who each is best for

IYRI: Fits investors seeking maximum current monthly income from real estate who are willing to sacrifice capital appreciation for a structured, yield-focused approach with reduced volatility. Most relevant for those who want high distribution frequency and view the real estate exposure as secondary to the income stream.

O: Designed for investors building a long-term real estate holding with monthly income and dividend growth potential, who are comfortable with equity-like volatility in exchange for exposure to an operating business with a three-decade track record of raising distributions.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion from yield level. IYRI's 10.88% distribution yield is roughly 2.1x O's. Options overlay funds often distribute a mix of option premiums and return of capital; if call premiums dry up or underlying REIT values decline, distributions may rely increasingly on capital, eroding net asset value over time.
  • Capped upside and roll-down risk. By selling covered calls to boost yield, IYRI forgoes participation in real estate price appreciation above the strike price. In a rising rate environment or property value recovery, this drag becomes a meaningful opportunity cost relative to O's uncapped exposure.
  • Early track record for IYRI. Launched less than a month ago, IYRI has no history through market stress, rising or falling rates, or options volatility cycles. Its beta of 0.0 is reported based on an index overlay model, not observed returns—real-world behavior may differ once options traders reprice or the underlying REIT index moves sharply.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity for O. As a net-lease REIT, O's property values and tenant creditworthiness are sensitive to changes in discount rates and economic activity. Rising rates compress REIT valuations, and economic weakness can trigger tenant defaults or rent reductions at lease renewal.
  • Options pricing and volatility decay. IYRI's monthly income depends on the premium options buyers are willing to pay for REIT call protection. In low-volatility environments or during periods of crowded options-writing strategies, those premiums may compress, reducing the overlay's contribution to yield.

Bottom line

IYRI targets investors who prioritize maximum current income with volatility dampening; O serves those seeking real estate ownership with organic dividend growth and the ability to participate in property value appreciation. IYRI's 10.88% yield comes with a very short track record and meaningful capital appreciation cap; O's lower 5.20% yield reflects sustainable cash generation from an operating business refined over three decades. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and the appeal of each depends on whether you value the certainty of near-term income (IYRI) or the flexibility and growth potential of a traditional REIT (O).

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.