DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IYRI vs VNQ: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF and Vanguard Real Estate ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 4, 2026

Best for

  • IYRIInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 11.08%, generated by selling options premium.
  • VNQInvestors who want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IYRI has lagged VNQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 7.41% total return against 9.89%. Measured from Jan 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — VNQ has compounded at 9.37% a year versus 9.15% for IYRI. IYRI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 10.6% against 13.6% for VNQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Jan 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IYRI6.97%7.41%9.15%10.6%0.250.34-7.5%
VNQ10.60%9.89%9.37%13.6%0.360.51-8.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 4, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Jan 2025” measures every fund from January 15, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIYRIVNQ
Full nameNEOS Real Estate High Income ETFVanguard Real Estate ETF
IssuerNEOSVanguard
Underlying indexDow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped IndexMSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/50 Index
Last Close$48.32 as of September 4, 2026$96.02 as of September 4, 2026
Distribution rate11.08%3.56%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7992
Safety-Adjusted Yield 8.75%3.28%
Expense ratio0.68%0.13%
AUM$312M$38.0B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
ObjectiveSeeks to generate high monthly income with the potential for equity appreciation.Track the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date01/14/202509/23/2004
Beta0.98
Last dividend$0.4461$0.8554
Ex-dividend date08/19/202606/24/2026

Bottom lineChoose IYRI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 11.08%, generated by selling options premium. Choose VNQ if you want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity. There's no free lunch: IYRI's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while VNQ keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. IYRI generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs19
Total AUM$32.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IYRI.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4654B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VNQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

IYRI offers the higher yield at 11.08% vs 3.56% for VNQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VNQ is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.13% compared to 0.68%.

They have different reference exposures: IYRI is linked to Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index while VNQ is linked to MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/50 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VNQ is the larger fund by assets ($38.0B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose IYRI

NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — IYRI distributes roughly 11.08% from selling options premium, vs 3.56% for VNQ.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Choose VNQ

Vanguard Real Estate ETF

  • Want real-estate exposure for income and inflation sensitivity.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.13% expense ratio vs 0.68% for IYRI.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IYRI would generate roughly $92.33/month, while VNQ would produce $29.67/month, at current distribution rates.

IYRI yield11.08%
VNQ yield3.56%
Monthly diff on $10K$62.67

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IYRI would cost approximately $680 in fees vs $130 for VNQ (simplified, not compounded). The $550.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

IYRI ER0.68%
VNQ ER0.13%

Strategy & risk

IYRI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index with an options approach, while VNQ tracks MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/50 Index with a dividend approach.

IYRI beta
VNQ beta0.98

Fund details

IYRI is managed by NEOS (launched 01/14/2025) with $312M in assets. VNQ is managed by Vanguard (launched 09/23/2004) with $38.0B in assets.

IYRI AUM$312M
VNQ AUM$38.0B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for IYRI and VNQ?

IYRI currently distributes 11.08% and VNQ 3.56%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is IYRI or VNQ better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. IYRI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IYRI and VNQ?

IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index with an options approach, while VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) tracks MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/50 Index with a dividend approach. They are issued by NEOS and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both IYRI and VNQ?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is IYRI or VNQ safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — VNQ scores 92, IYRI scores 79, so VNQ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, IYRI or VNQ?

IYRI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VNQ charges 0.13%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in IYRI vs VNQ generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IYRI would generate roughly $92.33 per month ($1,108.00 annually). The same in VNQ would produce about $29.67 per month ($356.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IYRI or VNQ?

IYRI has lagged VNQ over the trailing twelve months, posting a 7.41% total return against 9.89%. Measured from Jan 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — VNQ has compounded at 9.37% a year versus 9.15% for IYRI. IYRI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 10.6% against 13.6% for VNQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

IYRI vs VNQ — at a glance

Generated September 5, 2026.

Overview

IYRI and VNQ both track U.S. real estate through index-based strategies, but they pursue fundamentally different income models. VNQ is a traditional broad REIT index fund that captures dividends paid by diversified real estate companies. IYRI, launched in January 2025, overlays options strategies on a capped real estate index to generate much higher monthly distributions. The choice between them hinges on income expectations versus risk tolerance and time horizon.

How they differ

The core difference is strategy: VNQ holds REITs and collects their underlying dividends (3.56%), while IYRI uses derivatives to synthesize income, targeting 11.08%. That 7.5 percentage-point yield gap comes from options overlay—IYRI sells call spreads or similar structures to generate premium income on top of the index. IYRI's ultra-high yield suggests distributions will likely include significant return-of-capital, which means the fund's net asset value may erode over time if the underlying real estate index doesn't appreciate enough to offset payouts. VNQ, by contrast, is structured to preserve capital and let compounding do the work.

Who each is best for

IYRI: Fits investors seeking maximum current monthly cash flow from real estate exposure and comfortable with the probability of NAV decline if the underlying index stagnates or falls short of distribution levels.

VNQ: Designed for investors building long-term real estate allocation who prioritize capital preservation, low costs, and quarterly dividend income, and who are indifferent to the timing of distributions.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at ultra-high yields. IYRI's 11.08% distribution rate far exceeds typical REIT dividend yields. If the underlying Dow Jones Real Estate Capped Index does not appreciate sufficiently to cover distributions, share price will likely decline over time, offsetting or reversing income gains.
  • Options overlay complexity and tail risk. IYRI's derivative strategy is sensitive to implied volatility spikes, sudden price gaps, and early assignment. A sharp market reversal could limit upside capture or force defensive repositioning at unfavorable prices.
  • Fund age and capacity risk. IYRI is 1 year old with in assets. Early-stage funds with small asset bases face closure or merger risk if flows don't stabilize, and may experience wider bid-ask spreads.
  • Index concentration and overlap. Both funds hold the same asset class (U.S. real estate), so their performance will likely move together in a broad sector sell-off. Verify that the underlying indices—Dow Jones Capped versus MSCI IMI—don't create unexpected concentration in specific property types or geographies.
  • Distribution yield sustainability. VNQ's 3.56% yield is supported by genuine REIT earnings. IYRI's yield is constructed; it does not reflect underlying economic returns and may compress if volatility declines or if the fund's options-writing program must adjust to market conditions.

Bottom line

If you need maximum current income and accept the likelihood of NAV erosion, IYRI's monthly 11.08% yield and options overlay provide aggressive cash flow. If you value capital preservation, simplicity, and low cost to build a durable real estate holding, VNQ's 3.56% yield, 0.13% fee, and $38.0B scale offer a proven alternative. Past performance does not predict future results; the sustainability of IYRI's distributions depends on underlying index appreciation that has yet to be demonstrated.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.