ETF Comparison
MCD vs PEP: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of McDonald's Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Data updated May 20, 2026
Side-by-side snapshot
| MCD | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | McDonald's Corporation | PepsiCo, Inc. |
| Issuer | — | — |
| Last Close | $282.47 as of May 20, 2026 | $149.06 as of May 20, 2026 |
| Distribution yield | 2.57% | 3.82% |
| Expense ratio | — | — |
| AUM | — | — |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | — | — |
| Objective | Operates and franchises McDonald's restaurants serving a locally relevant menu of food and beverages in more than 100 countries worldwide. | Manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells beverages and convenient foods worldwide under brands including Pepsi, Lay's, Gatorade, and Quaker. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | — | — |
| Last dividend | $1.86 | $1.42 |
| Ex-dividend date | 03/03/2026 | 03/06/2026 |
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Quick verdict
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) and PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.
PEP offers the higher yield at 3.82% vs 2.57% for MCD. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, MCD would generate roughly $21.42/month, while PEP would produce $31.83/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, MCD would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $0 for PEP (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.
Strategy & risk
MCD tracks — with a dividend approach, while PEP tracks — using a dividend strategy.
Fund details
MCD is managed by — (launched —) with — in assets. PEP is managed by — (launched —) with — in assets.
Enjoyed this page?
Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.
Frequently asked questions
Is MCD or PEP better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. PEP currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between MCD and PEP?
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) tracks — with a dividend strategy, while PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) tracks — with a dividend approach. They are issued by — and — respectively.
Can I hold both MCD and PEP?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.
Which has lower fees, MCD or PEP?
MCD has an expense ratio of — while PEP charges —. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in MCD vs PEP generate?
At current rates, $10,000 in MCD would generate roughly $21.42 per month ($257.00 annually). The same in PEP would produce about $31.83 per month ($382.00 annually).
More comparisons to explore
People also compare PEP with
Popular comparisons
MCD vs PEP — at a glance
Generated April 2026 from current fund data.
Overview
McDonald's and PepsiCo are both mature, cash-generative consumer staples with strong dividend histories, but they operate in fundamentally different businesses. MCD is a restaurant franchisor and operator generating revenue primarily from franchise fees and company-operated store sales, while PEP manufactures and distributes branded beverages and snacks globally. The key distinction: MCD's model is real-estate and brand licensing; PEP's is consumer packaged goods manufacturing and distribution.
How they differ
MCD yields 2.37% on a $306 stock price, while PEP yields a notably higher 3.68% on a $155 stock price—a gap of 131 basis points. MCD's lower yield reflects its asset-light franchise model, which generates high returns on capital but requires less reinvestment; PEP's higher yield compensates for heavier capital intensity in manufacturing and distribution infrastructure. Both pay quarterly dividends, but PEP has outpaced MCD over the trailing 52 weeks, rising roughly 35% from its low versus MCD's 8% move, suggesting PEP has generated stronger price appreciation alongside its dividend. PEP's business is also more diversified across beverages (Pepsi, Gatorade) and snacks (Lay's, Quaker), whereas MCD's franchise dependency means earnings are more sensitive to real-estate lease economics and franchisee health.
Who each is best for
MCD: Income-focused investors in or near retirement who value steady, predictable cash flow and have already accumulated equity exposure; best held in taxable accounts where the modest 2.37% yield avoids creating tax drag and the stock's dividend-growth profile justifies a longer hold.
PEP: Dividend-growth investors seeking both yield and capital appreciation, with moderate-to-long time horizons; better suited to accounts where dividend reinvestment compounds, and attractive for those wanting exposure to packaged consumer goods rather than restaurant operations.
Key risks to know
- Franchise model dependency (MCD): McDonald's relies on franchisees' financial health and execution. Economic downturns or franchisee stress could pressure royalty flows and same-store sales.
- Commodity and input cost inflation (PEP): Manufacturing-heavy operations expose PEP to fluctuations in grain, sugar, oils, and transportation costs, which can compress margins if pricing power stalls.
- Consumer discretion pressure: Both face traffic and volume risk if discretionary spending weakens, though MCD's value positioning and PEP's snacking focus provide some resilience.
- Currency exposure (both): International revenue (MCD operates in 100+ countries; PEP derives significant sales abroad) introduces foreign-exchange headwinds that can reduce reported earnings and dividend growth.
Bottom line
If you want higher current yield with manufacturing diversification, PEP's 3.68% distribution and snack-and-beverage breadth fit that profile. If you prefer a capital-efficient, real-estate-anchored franchise model with a lower but dependable dividend, MCD's 2.37% yield and asset-light structure appeal to core dividend holders. Past performance, including PEP's recent outperformance, does not guarantee future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Model these ETFs in your own portfolio
Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.