Stock Comparison
MCD vs PEP: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of McDonald's Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Data updated August 21, 2026
Best for
- MCDInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.
- PEPInvestors who want higher current income (3.99% vs 2.78% for MCD).
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Total returns
MCD has lagged PEP over the trailing twelve months, posting a -11.96% total return against -2.07%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — MCD has compounded at 11.49% a year, ahead of PEP at 5.98%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Since Jun 1972 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCD | -10.16% | -11.96% | 1.04% | 4.83% | 11.49% | 18.96% | 18.1% | -0.19 | -0.26 | -22.5% |
| PEP | 1.78% | -2.07% | -3.79% | 0.99% | 5.98% | 11.59% | 20.0% | -0.42 | -0.59 | -27.5% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 21, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 1972” measures every fund from June 1, 1972 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  MCD |  PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | McDonald's Corporation | PepsiCo, Inc. |
| Issuer | — | — |
| Last Close | $270.95 as of August 21, 2026 | $143.48 as of August 21, 2026 |
| Distribution yield | 2.78% | 3.99% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 100 | 99 |
| Expense ratio | — | — |
| AUM | — | — |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | — | — |
| Objective | Operates and franchises McDonald's restaurants serving a locally relevant menu of food and beverages in more than 100 countries worldwide. | Manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells beverages and convenient foods worldwide under brands including Pepsi, Lay's, Gatorade, and Quaker. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.419 | 0.361 |
| Last dividend | $1.8600 | $1.4800 |
| Ex-dividend date | 09/01/2026 | 09/04/2026 |
Bottom lineChoose MCD if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose PEP if you want higher current income (3.99% vs 2.78% for MCD).
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each stock at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these stocks to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.
Quick verdict
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) and PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) are both quarterly-pay dividend-paying stocks, but they take different approaches.
PEP offers the higher yield at 3.99% vs 2.78% for MCD. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
Still deciding? Track MCD & PEP for free
Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, MCD would generate roughly $23.17/month, while PEP would produce $33.25/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.
Strategy & risk
MCD is a stock built around quick-service restaurant exposure, while PEP is a stock built around beverages & snacks exposure. Beta is 0.419 for MCD and 0.361 for PEP, making PEP the less volatile of the two by this measure.
Security details
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock. PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) is a stock.
Enjoyed this page?
Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.
Frequently asked questions
What is the current distribution yield for MCD and PEP?
MCD currently distributes 2.78% and PEP 3.99%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
Is MCD or PEP better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. PEP currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between MCD and PEP?
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock built around quick-service restaurant exposure, while PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) is a stock built around beverages & snacks exposure. They are issued by — and — respectively.
Can I hold both MCD and PEP?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Is MCD or PEP safer?
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: MCD scores 100, PEP scores 99. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.
How much income does $10,000 in MCD vs PEP generate?
At current rates, $10,000 in MCD would generate roughly $23.17 per month ($278.00 annually). The same in PEP would produce about $33.25 per month ($399.00 annually).
Which has performed better historically, MCD or PEP?
MCD has lagged PEP over the trailing twelve months, posting a -11.96% total return against -2.07%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — MCD has compounded at 11.49% a year, ahead of PEP at 5.98%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare PEP with
Popular comparisons
MCD vs PEP — at a glance
Generated August 15, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
McDonald's and PepsiCo are both mature dividend-paying stocks in the consumer discretionary and staples space, but they operate in different business models and geographies. McDonald's is a quick-service restaurant operator and franchisor with exposure to real estate and franchise fees; PepsiCo manufactures and distributes beverages and snacks globally. The key distinction is that MCD generates roughly two-thirds of its profit from franchise royalties and rent, while PEP derives income from product sales and manufacturing margins.
How they differ
MCD's business model centers on real estate and franchise operations—it owns or leases restaurant properties and collects royalties on sales, making it capital-light and highly scalable. PEP, by contrast, manufactures and distributes its products directly, requiring significant capital investment in production facilities and supply chain infrastructure. PEP's distribution rate is 4.10% versus MCD's 2.70%, but that reflects PEP's higher current payout ratio relative to earnings, not a superior growth trajectory. MCD trades at $272.83 with a beta of 0.419, while PEP is priced at $140.79 with a beta of 0.361, meaning MCD has modestly higher volatility relative to the broader market.
Who each is best for
MCD: Fits investors seeking exposure to a capital-light, globally diversified franchise model with modest but steady dividend growth and lower beta sensitivity to market swings.
PEP: Fits investors comfortable with a higher current yield in exchange for exposure to commodity input costs and manufacturing leverage, and who value exposure to an integrated beverages-and-snacks conglomerate.
Key risks to know
- Real estate and lease dependency (MCD). A meaningful portion of MCD's profit comes from leasing properties to franchisees. Rising real estate values, property tax increases, or a slowdown in franchise expansion could pressure both revenue growth and capital returns.
- Commodity cost inflation (PEP). PepsiCo faces direct exposure to input costs—agricultural commodities, packaging, and energy—which can compress operating margins if pricing power lags. MCD's franchise model insulates it somewhat by shifting cost pressures to franchisees.
- Franchise concentration and franchisee credit risk (MCD). MCD's profitability depends on franchisees' ability to pay royalties and rent. Economic downturns that stress individual franchisees or regional economies can impair royalty streams and lease payments.
- Scale and market saturation (both). Both stocks operate in mature, highly penetrated markets in developed countries. Growth in developed markets is limited to pricing increases and modest unit expansion; both rely heavily on international markets for volume growth.
Bottom line
PEP's 4.10% yield appeals to income-focused investors, but it comes with exposure to manufacturing costs and commodity inflation. MCD's lower yield and lower beta suit investors prioritizing capital stability and real estate-backed cash flows over current income. Both trade near all-time highs; past performance does not guarantee future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio
See how each stock fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.