DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

MST vs MSTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Defiance Leveraged Long + Income MSTR ETF and YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs14
Total AUM$5.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Defiance ETFs is known for creating thematic and yield-focused investment products that target specific sectors and income strategies. The issuer operates a lineup of 18 funds concentrated primarily on income generation and leveraged income approaches, with holdings spanning commodities, technology, emerging markets, and specialized themes like ethical investing and covered call strategies. Notable tickers include QQQY (leveraged Nasdaq income), SPYT (S&P 500 yield), and GLDY (gold-focused), reflecting the firm's emphasis on combining growth exposure with dividend and options-based income enhancement.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MST.

ETFs62
Total AUM$9.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax specializes in options-based and income-focused ETFs, leveraging covered call and short option strategies to generate high distribution yields for investors seeking regular income. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 61 ETFs organized across nine fund families, including prominent strategies like 0DTE (zero days-to-expiration) options, covered calls, and target distribution approaches, alongside more traditional performance and portfolio-based offerings. YieldMax's holdings span major technology and financial names—including tickers like AMZY, APLY, BRKC, and FBY—and the firm targets both individual investors and those seeking enhanced yield through systematic options strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY.

Side-by-side snapshot

MSTMSTY
Full nameDefiance Leveraged Long + Income MSTR ETFYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerDefiance ETFsYieldMax
Last Close$28.95 as of May 20, 2026$23.81 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield51.29%115.42%
Expense ratio1.31%1.03%
AUM$30M$1.2B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Underlying indexStrategy (MSTR)Strategy (MSTR)
ObjectiveOption IncomeCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/18/202307/18/2023
Last dividend$0.32$0.54
Ex-dividend date05/13/202605/14/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

MST (Defiance Leveraged Long + Income MSTR ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 115.42% vs 51.29% for MST. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

MSTY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 1.03% compared to 1.31%.

MSTY is the larger fund by assets ($1.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, MST would generate roughly $427.42/month, while MSTY would produce $961.83/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

MST yield51.29%
MSTY yield115.42%
Monthly diff on $10K$534.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, MST would cost approximately $1,310 in fees vs $1,030 for MSTY (simplified, not compounded). The $280.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

MST ER1.31%
MSTY ER1.03%

Strategy & risk

Both MST and MSTY wrap Strategy (MSTR) with options-based income overlays (option income and covered call). The practical differences are yield target, fee structure, and issuer track record — not the underlying mechanic.

Fund details

MST is managed by Defiance ETFs (launched 07/18/2023) with $30M in assets. MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/18/2023) with $1.2B in assets.

MST AUM$30M
MSTY AUM$1.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is MST or MSTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between MST and MSTY?

Both MST (Defiance Leveraged Long + Income MSTR ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) track Strategy (MSTR) with options-based income strategies — the labels "option income" and "covered call" describe closely related mechanics (covered calls are a specific type of options strategy). The real differences show up in yield target (51.29% vs 115.42%), expense ratio (1.31% vs 1.03%), and issuer (Defiance ETFs vs YieldMax).

Can I hold both MST and MSTY?

You can, but expect significant overlap. Both funds use options-based income strategies on Strategy (MSTR), so holding them together gives you two wrappers around effectively the same exposure — not true diversification. Weigh issuer, fee, and yield differences rather than treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, MST or MSTY?

MST has an expense ratio of 1.31% while MSTY charges 1.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in MST vs MSTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in MST would generate roughly $427.42 per month ($5,129.00 annually). The same in MSTY would produce about $961.83 per month ($11,542.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

MST vs MSTY — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

MST and MSTY are both weekly-distributing ETFs that run covered call strategies on MicroStrategy (MSTR), the bitcoin-holding software company. MST is Defiance's option income vehicle; MSTY is YieldMax's covered call fund. Both launched the same day and harvest call premiums to generate income, but they differ substantially in scale, yield mechanics, and risk profile.

How they differ

The biggest difference is size: MSTY manages $1.05 billion in assets versus MST's $20 million. That scale matters for execution quality and fund stability. Second, MSTY reports a 70.51% distribution rate against a SEC 30-day yield of unknown composition, while MST's 85% distribution rate pairs with a negative SEC 30-day yield of -0.12%—a red flag suggesting distributions are drawing down principal rather than coming from earned income or call premiums. Third, MSTY's expense ratio is 1.03% versus MST's 1.31%, and MSTY's last dividend was $0.31 per share against MST's $0.18—meaning MSTY paid more cash despite a lower stated distribution rate. The 52-week price range tells a related story: MSTY traded between $19.17 and $126.50, while MST ranged from $16.59 to $678.44. MST's extreme volatility and inverted SEC yield suggest the fund has struggled to sustain distributions from option premium alone.

Who each is best for

  • MSTY: Investors seeking weekly income from MSTR exposure with a fund that has proven institutional backing, lower fees, positive SEC yield mechanics, and meaningful liquidity—ideally in taxable accounts where the weekly distribution frequency can be reinvested or harvested for tax-loss management.
  • MST: Speculative traders with high risk tolerance and a short time horizon who understand that negative SEC yields may signal return-of-capital distributions and are comfortable with the trade-off of higher distributions offset by potential NAV erosion in exchange for maximum income extraction.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at negative SEC yields. MST's -0.12% SEC 30-day yield indicates distributions are outpacing underlying income and premium collection, a pattern that often leads to per-share NAV decline over time.
  • Single-stock concentration. Both funds hold only MicroStrategy. If MSTR enters a prolonged decline, call premiums shrink and the fund has no diversification buffer; the 52-week low of $16.59 for MST shows how far these funds can compress.
  • Call cap risk. Covered call strategies cap upside. If MSTR rallies sharply, shares are called away at a strike price, and the fund locks in gains while missing further appreciation.
  • AUM fragility. MST's $20 million base is vulnerable to closure or forced liquidation if outflows accelerate; smaller funds often face delisting risk and wider bid-ask spreads, making exit costly.
  • Weekly distribution sustainability. Weekly payouts create a perception of high yield that may not reflect underlying returns, especially when SEC yield is negative or near zero.

Bottom line

If you prioritize scale, lower fees, positive yield economics, and fund stability, MSTY is the more durable choice for MSTR income. If you're comfortable accepting distribution-driven NAV decay and extreme volatility for maximum income extraction, MST offers higher stated yields—but understand you're likely getting return of capital, not earned income. Past performance doesn't predict future results; both funds' returns depend entirely on MSTR's price movement and implied volatility.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.