DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

MSTY vs NVDY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs60
Total AUM$9.78B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY and NVDY.

Side-by-side snapshot

MSTYNVDY
Full nameYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETFYieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Last Close$13.58 as of July 4, 2026$12.12 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield59.35%42.05%
Distribution Safety Score3157
Expense ratio0.99%1.01%
AUM$1.01B$1.43B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Underlying indexStrategy (MSTR)NVIDIA (NVDA)
ObjectiveCovered CallCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date02/21/202405/09/2023
Beta2.56041.3
Last dividend$0.1550$0.0980
Ex-dividend date06/18/202606/18/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

MSTY has lagged NVDY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -69.58% total return against 23.64%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDY has compounded at 34.88% a year versus 6.04% for MSTY. NVDY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 28.5% against 64.9% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Feb 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
MSTY-35.18%-69.58%6.04%64.9%-1.90-2.46-77.7%
NVDY1.24%23.64%34.88%28.5%0.590.82-16.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Feb 2024” measures every fund from February 22, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

MSTY offers the higher yield at 59.35% vs 42.05% for NVDY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

MSTY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.99% compared to 1.01%.

They track different benchmarks: MSTY is linked to Strategy (MSTR) while NVDY tracks NVIDIA (NVDA), which means their performance drivers differ.

NVDY is the larger fund by assets ($1.43B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, MSTY would generate roughly $494.58/month, while NVDY would produce $350.42/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

MSTY yield59.35%
NVDY yield42.05%
Monthly diff on $10K$144.17

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, MSTY would cost approximately $990 in fees vs $1,010 for NVDY (simplified, not compounded). The $20.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

MSTY ER0.99%
NVDY ER1.01%

Strategy & risk

MSTY tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach, while NVDY tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach. Beta is 2.5604 for MSTY and 1.3 for NVDY, indicating NVDY is less volatile relative to the market.

MSTY beta2.5604
NVDY beta1.3

Fund details

MSTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 02/21/2024) with $1.01B in assets. NVDY is managed by YieldMax (launched 05/09/2023) with $1.43B in assets.

MSTY AUM$1.01B
NVDY AUM$1.43B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is MSTY or NVDY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between MSTY and NVDY?

MSTY (YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a covered call approach, while NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach. They are issued by YieldMax and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both MSTY and NVDY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, MSTY or NVDY?

MSTY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while NVDY charges 1.01%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in MSTY vs NVDY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in MSTY would generate roughly $494.58 per month ($5,935.00 annually). The same in NVDY would produce about $350.42 per month ($4,205.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, MSTY or NVDY?

MSTY has lagged NVDY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -69.58% total return against 23.64%. Measured from Feb 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDY has compounded at 34.88% a year versus 6.04% for MSTY. NVDY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 28.5% against 64.9% for MSTY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

MSTY vs NVDY — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

MSTY and NVDY are both weekly-distribution covered call ETFs from YieldMax that overlay options strategies on single large-cap stocks—but they target vastly different underlying assets and volatility profiles. MSTY writes calls against MicroStrategy (MSTR), a Bitcoin proxy with extreme price swings, while NVDY does the same against NVIDIA (NVDA), a large-cap semiconductor stock. The structural difference is immediate: MSTY distributes 81.47% annually versus NVDY's 42.94%, a gap driven almost entirely by MSTR's higher volatility and the call premium it generates.

How they differ

The biggest difference is the underlying stock's volatility and leverage exposure. MSTY carries a beta of 2.56, meaning it amplifies market moves by more than 2.5 times, because MicroStrategy itself is a leveraged play on Bitcoin. NVDY's beta of 1.3 reflects NVIDIA's more modest equity-market correlation. That volatility gap directly drives the yield gap: MSTY's 81.47% distribution rate comes from writing calls on a stock that can swing 10–20% in a week; NVDY's 42.94% reflects the more stable premium on NVIDIA call options.

The second difference is fund size and investor adoption. NVDY has been running since May 2023 and has accumulated $1.43B in AUM, while MSTY launched much more recently (February 2024) but has already grown to $1.01B—a sign of strong retail interest in leveraged income strategies, though still concentrated in a newer product. Expense ratios are nearly identical at 0.99% and 1.01%, so they're not a decision factor.

The third difference is risk of principal erosion. At an 81.47% annual distribution rate, MSTY is relying heavily on call premium capture; if MSTR's volatility collapses or the stock rallies sharply above strike prices repeatedly, the fund's NAV can deteriorate over time. NVDY's lower yield provides more cushion, though at 42.94% it's still above typical corporate equity dividend yields and exposes the fund to similar (albeit milder) NAV compression if NVIDIA enters a prolonged uptrend.

Who each is best for

  • MSTY: Fits investors with high risk tolerance who want leveraged exposure to Bitcoin price movements through a large-cap proxy and are willing to chase high weekly income in exchange for significant NAV volatility and the possibility of sharp drawdowns.
  • NVDY: Fits investors seeking moderate equity income above traditional dividend yields, who are comfortable holding a large-cap semiconductor position, and accept weekly distributions and call-writing discipline in place of price appreciation.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution rates. MSTY's 81.47% annual yield is well above the typical return of the underlying stock and creates pressure on net asset value if MicroStrategy's volatility subsides or the covered calls expire in-the-money repeatedly. Investors may see distributions partially or wholly financed by return of capital rather than underlying gains.
  • Leveraged beta and drawdown risk. MSTY's beta of 2.56 means that a 10% decline in the broader market or Bitcoin ecosystem can translate to a 25%+ loss in the fund. Volatility clustering in crypto-linked assets can produce sharp, unexpected drops that erode capital between distributions.
  • Call-strike assignment and upside cap. Both funds write calls to generate yield; if the underlying stock rallies past the strike price consistently, holders forfeit all gains above that level, turning what looks like a 42–81% yield into negative total return if the stock itself declines or moves sideways.
  • Concentration risk in single-stock exposure. MSTY and NVDY each hold only one underlying company. Company-specific events—earnings misses, executive departures, regulatory action, or a shift in market sentiment toward crypto or semiconductors—can instantly devalue the entire fund. There is no diversification.
  • Dividend capture timing and tax inefficiency. Weekly distributions create 52 taxable events per year and encourage reinvestment at arbitrary prices. The turnover in call option positions is high, and in taxable accounts, the combination of short-term option gains and capital gains/losses can produce unexpected tax bills.

Bottom line

If you want leveraged Bitcoin-proxy income with a high risk appetite and a short time horizon, MSTY's 81.47% yield and 2.56 beta are the obvious draw. If you prefer moderate single-stock income with lower volatility and a larger established fund, NVDY's 42.94% yield and 1.3 beta offer a steadier alternative. Both funds sacrifice principal appreciation and diversification for weekly cash flow; neither is a buy-and-hold core holding. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.