DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

MSTW vs MSTY: Weekly Leverage or MSTR Options Income?

MSTW targets 1.2 times MSTR's calendar-week total return before fees and expenses, alongside weekly distributions. MSTY seeks income through MSTR call spreads. One has a leveraged weekly return target; the other reshapes MSTR participation through an options-income strategy.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • MSTWInvestors who want amplified weekly MSTR exposure and accept leverage and compounding.
  • MSTYInvestors who want MSTR-linked option income and accept substantial single-stock losses.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

MSTW has lagged MSTY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -65.26% total return against -47.75%. Measured from Jul 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” MSTY has compounded at -51.97% a year versus -68.25% for MSTW. MSTY has been the steadier holding, though β€” annualized volatility of 69.7% against 96.7% for MSTW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Jul 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
MSTW-13.71%-65.26%-68.25%96.7%-1.14-1.62-84.6%
MSTY-3.71%-47.75%-51.97%69.7%-1.00-1.40-71.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. β€œSince Jul 2025” measures every fund from July 24, 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) β€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β€” shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricMSTWMSTY
Forward distribution rate99.21%100.79%
Trailing 12-month yield157.90%142.46%
30-day SEC yieldβ€”0.96%
Return of capital100.00%98.87%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on MSTW vs MSTR, MSTY vs MSTR.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricMSTWMSTY
Full nameRoundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETFYieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerRoundhill InvestmentsYieldMax
Last Close$4.90 as of September 30, 2026$16.05 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate99.21%100.79%
Trailing 12-month yield157.90%142.46%
30-day SEC yieldβ€”0.96%
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ 5058
Safety-Adjusted Yield 49.60%58.46%
Expense ratio1.00%1.03%
AUM$85.3M$1.13B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Underlying indexStrategy (MSTR)Strategy (MSTR)
ObjectiveMSTW targets weekly payouts and 120% of the weekly total return of Strategy before fees.Actively managed fund that seeks current income while maintaining indirect exposure to the share price of MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR), subject to a limit on potential investment gains.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/24/202502/21/2024
Beta3.65652.5604
Last dividend$0.093484$0.3111 declared, pays 10/02/2026
Ex-dividend date09/28/202610/01/2026 upcoming

Bottom lineChoose MSTW if you want amplified weekly MSTR exposure and accept leverage and compounding. Choose MSTY if you want MSTR-linked option income and accept substantial single-stock losses. That is not its target. The multiplier applies to a calendar week, before fees and expenses; compounding across weeks can produce a different longer-term result. MSTY has a different options mandate. Neither fund diversifies away MSTR risk, and weekly cash payments do not guarantee positive total returns.

MSTW vs MSTY: Weekly Leverage or MSTR Options Income?

MSTW targets 1.2 times MSTR's calendar-week total return before fees and expenses, alongside weekly distributions. MSTY seeks income through MSTR call spreads. One has a leveraged weekly return target; the other reshapes MSTR participation through an options-income strategy.

MSTWMSTY
ApproachLeveraged calendar-week MSTR targetMSTR-linked call-spread income
Risk reviewSingle-stock losses, leverage and compoundingSingle-stock losses and limited upside participation
Expense ratio1.00%1.03%
Portfolio fitReview combined holdings and weightsReview combined holdings and weights

How the risk works

  • Weekly leverage target. MSTW targets amplified calendar-week MSTR returns, not a daily index multiple. Longer holding periods introduce compounding effects.
  • Single-company exposure. Both funds depend on MSTR, whose bitcoin-related business adds risk. Neither fund is direct ownership of bitcoin.
  • Options trade-off. MSTY's call spreads change upside participation while leaving substantial downside exposure. Distributions do not protect principal.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs56
Total AUM$39.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTW.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSTY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

MSTW targets 1.2 times MSTR's calendar-week total return before fees and expenses, alongside weekly distributions. MSTY seeks income through MSTR call spreads. One has a leveraged weekly return target; the other reshapes MSTR participation through an options-income strategy.

That is not its target. The multiplier applies to a calendar week, before fees and expenses; compounding across weeks can produce a different longer-term result. MSTY has a different options mandate. Neither fund diversifies away MSTR risk, and weekly cash payments do not guarantee positive total returns.

Deep dive

Match the holding period to the mandate

A leveraged weekly target should not be read as a promised annual multiple. Compare an actual same-date investment path with distributions reinvested, and consider the effect of alternating gains and losses. A payment schedule does not change that compounding arithmetic.

Continue the comparison

MSTR vs MSTY Β· MSTY vs QQQI

Strategy sources checked September 27, 2026: MSTW issuer material Β· MSTY issuer material.

Current metrics use the dated snapshot above. Distributions can vary and may include return of capital; a distribution rate is not an expected total return.

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Will MSTW return 1.2 times MSTR over a year?

That is not its target. The multiplier applies to a calendar week, before fees and expenses; compounding across weeks can produce a different longer-term result. MSTY has a different options mandate. Neither fund diversifies away MSTR risk, and weekly cash payments do not guarantee positive total returns.

How should I compare risk and ownership costs?

Use matching dates and definitions for returns, distributions, and fees. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection. Check current bid-ask spreads and premiums or discounts; AUM alone does not determine the price available for your order.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.