DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

NASA vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Tema Space Innovators ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 31, 2026

ETFs12
Total AUM$3.61B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Tema ETFs specializes in thematic investing, focusing on innovative sectors and mega-trends rather than traditional asset classes. The firm's current lineup consists of a single actively managed fund, the NASA ETF (NASDAQ: NASA), which targets companies involved in space exploration, satellite technology, and related aerospace industries. This niche approach appeals to investors seeking concentrated exposure to emerging technology themes beyond conventional dividend or income strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on NASA.

ETFs3
Total AUM$24.7M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares operates a focused suite of two income-focused ETFs designed to generate regular distributions through options strategies and dividend investing. The firm's lineup includes ODTE and VAIE, both emphasizing yield generation for investors seeking regular cash flow. With a specialized niche in options-based and dividend income strategies, VegaShares targets investors prioritizing distributions over capital appreciation.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.

Side-by-side snapshot

NASAXSPC
Full nameTema Space Innovators ETFVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF
IssuerTema ETFsVegaShares
Last Close$21.62 as of July 31, 2026$18.62 as of July 31, 2026
Distribution yield
Distribution Safety Score™
Expense ratio0.75%0.75%
AUM$1.33B$1.85M
Distribution frequencyNoneNone
Underlying index
ObjectiveActively managed ETF investing in companies driving the space economy, including aerospace, satellite, and space-enabling technologies.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/31/202606/15/2026

— Distribution yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because NASA launched March 2026 and XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineNASA and XSPC are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar exposure with very similar cost and risk. Fees are effectively identical, so it comes down to which your broker offers commission-free and any share-price or tax-lot preference.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

NASA has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a -14.14% total return against -26.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Jun 2026
NASA-14.14%-32.40%
XSPC-26.01%-26.01%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 31, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window.

Quick verdict

NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, NASA has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

NASA yield
XSPC yield

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, NASA would cost approximately $750 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

NASA ER0.75%
XSPC ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

NASA is an ETF, while XSPC is an ETF.

Fund details

NASA is managed by Tema ETFs (launched 03/31/2026) with $1.33B in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $1.85M in assets.

NASA AUM$1.33B
XSPC AUM$1.85M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of NASA or XSPC pays more dividend income?

XSPC currently reports a distribution yield, while NASA has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between NASA and XSPC?

NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) is an ETF, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF. They are issued by Tema ETFs and VegaShares respectively.

Can I hold both NASA and XSPC?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, NASA or XSPC?

NASA and XSPC both charge the same expense ratio of 0.75%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in NASA vs XSPC generate?

At current rates, NASA has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. XSPC has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, NASA or XSPC?

NASA has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a -14.14% total return against -26.01%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.