ROKT
Caution
High confidence
ETF Comparison
ROKT vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
No track record yet. XSPC launched within the last six months. The forward distribution rate is left blank until a payout is published.
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
XSPC
Not rated
No published distribution safety rating is available.
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  ROKT |  XSPC |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF |
| Issuer | State Street | VegaShares |
| Last Close | $96.55 as of November 6, 2026 | $16.79 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 0.21% | — |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.22% | — |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 55 | — |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 0.12% | — |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| AUM | $150M | $1.75M |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | None |
| Underlying index | S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index | — |
| Objective | Tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, providing exposure to companies driving innovation in deep space and deep sea frontiers. | Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 10/19/2018 | 06/15/2026 |
| Beta | 1.49 | — |
| Last dividend | $0.051 | — |
| Ex-dividend date | 09/21/2026 | — |
— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
ROKT has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a 9.76% total return against -39.49%. ROKT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 26.5% against 53.4% for XSPC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | Since Jun 2026 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROKT | 9.76% | -20.40% | 26.5% | -2.35 | -2.82 | -24.0% |
| XSPC | -39.49% | -39.49% | 53.4% | -2.50 | -3.13 | -39.5% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jun 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jun 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Not a distribution payer
XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. XSPC is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineWe won't call this one: XSPC launched June 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — ROKT charges 0.45% against 0.75% for XSPC, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs186
Total AUM$2.15T
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROKT.
ETFs7
Total AUM$79.0M
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.
Quick verdict
ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.
ROKT currently shows a 0.21% distribution yield. XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.
ROKT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.45% compared to 0.75%.
ROKT has $150M in assets vs $1.75M for XSPC, but XSPC only launched June 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
0 shared positions
ROKT 0.0% of its top-10 weight
XSPC 0.0% of its top-10 weight
No overlap among the top-10 disclosed holdings of ROKT, XSPC. These funds draw from largely different positions at the top of their books.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, ROKT would pay about $21.00 a year (about $5.25 per quarterly distribution), while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available.
ROKT yield0.21%
XSPC yield—
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, ROKT would cost approximately $450 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). The $300.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
ROKT ER0.45%
XSPC ER0.75%
Strategy & risk
ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while XSPC is an ETF built around a thematic strategy.
ROKT beta1.49
XSPC beta—
Fund details
ROKT is managed by State Street (launched 10/19/2018) with $150M in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $1.75M in assets.
ROKT AUM$150M
XSPC AUM$1.75M
Frequently asked questions
Which of ROKT or XSPC pays more dividend income?
ROKT currently reports a distribution yield, while XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.
What is the difference between ROKT and XSPC?
ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF built around a thematic strategy. They are issued by State Street and VegaShares respectively.
Can I hold both ROKT and XSPC?
Yes. Their disclosed top-10 holdings share no positions, so combining both spreads your money across different underlying names — see the holdings-overlap section above for the details. Overlap outside the disclosed top 10 can still exist.
Which has lower fees, ROKT or XSPC?
ROKT has an expense ratio of 0.45% while XSPC charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in ROKT vs XSPC generate?
At current distribution rates, $10,000 in ROKT would pay about $21.00 a year (about $5.25 per quarterly distribution). XSPC does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate.
Which has performed better historically, ROKT or XSPC?
ROKT has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a 9.76% total return against -39.49%. ROKT has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 26.5% against 53.4% for XSPC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare ROKT with
People also compare XSPC with
Popular comparisons
ROKT vs XSPC — at a glance
Generated October 31, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
ROKT and XSPC are both space-themed equity ETFs, but they operate at vastly different scales and with different structural philosophies. ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, a broad thematic index covering innovation in deep space and deep sea exploration. XSPC is a newer, smaller fund focused specifically on SpaceX and related companies operating in the broader space economy. The key distinction is scope: ROKT casts a wider net across frontier technologies, while XSPC concentrates on the SpaceX ecosystem and near-earth space infrastructure.
How they differ
ROKT's underlying index includes companies across deep space, deep sea, and frontier innovation — a diversified approach to exploration-driven themes. XSPC, by contrast, appears narrowly focused on SpaceX-adjacent holdings and the commercial space sector, suggesting higher concentration risk. ROKT's expense ratio is 0.45%, versus 0.75% for XSPC — a 30-basis-point gap favoring ROKT.
Who each is best for
ROKT: Fits investors seeking diversified exposure to frontier-technology themes with established index methodology, who can tolerate elevated beta (1.49) and expect the fund to grow large enough to trade with minimal tracking issues.
XSPC: Designed for investors with a concentrated thesis on SpaceX's commercial dominance and the narrow orbit of suppliers and launch partners, who accept micro-cap liquidity constraints and the risk of very high portfolio concentration.
Key risks to know
- NAV volatility and beta: ROKT has a 1.49 beta, meaning it amplifies broad market moves by roughly half again. Space and frontier-tech stocks are inherently volatile, and this magnification can drive sharp drawdowns during risk-off periods.
- Concentration and single-company exposure: XSPC's narrow focus on SpaceX and adjacent names creates acute single-company risk. A regulatory setback, launch failure, or competitive shift affecting SpaceX directly could crater the fund's holdings in one stroke. Trading costs and slippage can dwarf the fund's cost structure.
- Theme-dependent cash flows: Neither fund pays meaningful yield (ROKT's 0.21% is symbolic; XSPC pays nothing). Returns depend entirely on capital appreciation, which relies on space and frontier tech remaining investor-favored themes — a bet that can reverse quickly.
- Index composition risk: ROKT's underlying index includes deep-sea exploration alongside space — an unusual pairing that introduces non-space risks and makes the fund less of a pure-play space bet than its name suggests.
Bottom line
If you value diversification across frontier themes and a liquid, established fund structure, ROKT offers broader exposure and lower fees. If you're making a concentrated bet on SpaceX's dominance and can tolerate micro-cap trading friction, XSPC aligns with that thesis — but the extreme size gap and concentration risk mean XSPC is a specialized tool, not a general-purpose space-sector exposure. Past performance in hot thematic sectors does not predict future results, and theme popularity can shift dramatically.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.