DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ROKT vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 4, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

ROKT has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a 23.03% total return against -17.28%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTDSince Jun 2026
ROKT23.03%-7.16%
XSPC-17.28%-17.28%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 4, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricROKTXSPC
Full nameSPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETFVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF
IssuerState StreetVegaShares
Last Close$108.82 as of September 4, 2026$20.82 as of September 4, 2026
Distribution rate0.18%—
Distribution Safety Score™ 73—
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.13%—
Expense ratio0.45%0.75%
AUM$195M$1.05M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyNone
Underlying indexS&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index—
ObjectiveTracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, providing exposure to companies driving innovation in deep space and deep sea frontiers.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/19/201806/15/2026
Beta1.48—
Last dividend$0.048—
Ex-dividend date06/22/2026—

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: XSPC launched June 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — ROKT charges 0.45% against 0.75% for XSPC, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

Model this comparison:
Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

State Street
ETFs179
Total AUM$2124B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROKT.

See all State Street ETFs
VegaShares
ETFs5
Total AUM$56.4M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.

See all VegaShares ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

ROKT currently shows a 0.18% distribution yield. XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

ROKT is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.45% compared to 0.75%.

ROKT has $195M in assets vs $1.05M for XSPC, but XSPC only launched June 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ROKT would generate roughly $1.50/month, while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

ROKT yield0.18%
XSPC yield—

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ROKT would cost approximately $450 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). The $300.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ROKT ER0.45%
XSPC ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while XSPC is an ETF built around a thematic strategy.

ROKT beta1.48
XSPC beta—

Fund details

ROKT is managed by State Street (launched 10/19/2018) with $195M in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $1.05M in assets.

ROKT AUM$195M
XSPC AUM$1.05M
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of ROKT or XSPC pays more dividend income?

ROKT currently reports a distribution yield, while XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between ROKT and XSPC?

ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF built around a thematic strategy. They are issued by State Street and VegaShares respectively.

Can I hold both ROKT and XSPC?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, ROKT or XSPC?

ROKT has an expense ratio of 0.45% while XSPC charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ROKT vs XSPC generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in ROKT would generate roughly $1.50 per month ($18.00 annually). XSPC has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, ROKT or XSPC?

ROKT has outpaced XSPC over the year to date, posting a 23.03% total return against -17.28%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ROKT vs XSPC — at a glance

Generated September 5, 2026.

Overview

ROKT and XSPC are both equity ETFs focused on space and frontier technology, but they differ fundamentally in scope and maturity. ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, which covers companies advancing innovation in deep space and deep sea exploration. XSPC is a newer, thematic ETF launched in 2026 focused on space exploration and related technologies, but operates at a much smaller scale.

How they differ

ROKT is a broad-based index fund tracking a multi-frontier innovation strategy (space and deep sea), while XSPC appears narrowly focused on space exposure alone. ROKT has $195M in assets under management versus $1.05M for XSPC, a vast difference in scale that affects trading liquidity and fund viability. ROKT exhibits a 1.48 beta, reflecting higher sensitivity to market swings. ROKT has been operating since 10/19/2018, whereas XSPC is a very new fund launched 06/15/2026.

Who each is best for

ROKT: Fits investors seeking diversified exposure to multiple frontier innovation themes (space and ocean technology) through an established, liquid index vehicle with modest income and lower fees.

XSPC: Fits investors with a specific conviction in space technology who can accept illiquidity, higher fees, minimal assets under management, and the operational risks of a brand-new fund.

Key risks to know

  • Thematic concentration. Both funds bet heavily on the space and frontier-tech narrative; if investor enthusiasm for these themes cools, both may face significant outflows and valuation pressure. Their holdings likely overlap substantially, compounding this risk if you hold both.
  • Extreme illiquidity in XSPC. With only $1.05M in assets, XSPC faces severe liquidity challenges—wide bid-ask spreads are likely, and the fund may struggle to survive if assets decline further or redemptions accelerate.
  • ROKT's market sensitivity. At a 1.48 beta, ROKT amplifies market moves. Downturns in growth and innovation stocks will hit harder than the broader market, and the space/deep-sea sector is cyclical and speculative.
  • XSPC fund-closure risk. As a newly launched fund with minimal AUM, XSPC faces realistic potential for liquidation if it fails to attract meaningful capital. Closure would force investors to redeploy at market prices, potentially locking in losses.
  • Limited earnings in early-stage companies. Many space and frontier-tech firms are pre-revenue or unprofitable. Both funds carry the risk that holdings fail to commercialize their innovations, eroding capital over time.

Bottom line

If you want established index-based exposure to frontier innovation themes with reasonable scale and modest income, ROKT offers a far more practical structure. If you have conviction in space technology specifically and can tolerate micro-cap fund risk, XSPC's narrow focus may appeal—but its illiquidity and early-stage status present real challenges. Past performance in the space sector does not predict future returns, and thematic enthusiasm can reverse sharply.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

How to read a fund's stats How expense ratios eat returns Correlation between two funds

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener