DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

UFO vs XSPC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Procure Space ETF and VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 18, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings.

UFO has outpaced XSPC over the shared window since Jun 2026, posting a -15.63% total return against -16.52%. UFO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 31.3% against 53.8% for XSPC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Jun 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
UFO-15.63%31.3%-2.25-3.12-16.5%
XSPC-16.52%53.8%-1.41-1.97-30.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Jun 2026” measures every fund from June 16, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jun 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jun 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricUFOXSPC
Full nameProcure Space ETFVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF
IssuerProcureVegaShares
Last Close$43.21 as of September 18, 2026$21.01 as of September 18, 2026
Distribution rate0.27%—
Distribution Safety Score™ 45—
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.12%—
Expense ratio0.75%0.75%
AUM$558M$2.12M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyNone
Underlying indexS-Network Space Index—
ObjectiveTracks the S-Network Space Index, providing exposure to companies that derive significant revenue from space-related business activities.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/10/201906/15/2026
Beta1.9—
Last dividend$0.058—
Ex-dividend date06/29/2026—

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because XSPC launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: XSPC launched June 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.

Model this comparison:
Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Procure
ETFs1
Total AUM$558M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Procure is known for offering thematic ETFs that target specific investment trends and sectors. The firm currently operates a focused lineup of one fund, the UFO ETF, which concentrates on a specialized thematic strategy. This niche approach allows investors seeking targeted exposure to particular market themes rather than broad-based diversification.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on UFO.

See all Procure ETFs
VegaShares
ETFs5
Total AUM$60.9M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XSPC.

See all VegaShares ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

UFO (Procure Space ETF) and XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

UFO currently shows a 0.27% distribution yield. XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

UFO has $558M in assets vs $2.12M for XSPC, but XSPC only launched June 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, UFO would generate roughly $2.25/month, while XSPC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

UFO yield0.27%
XSPC yield—

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, UFO would cost approximately $750 in fees vs $750 for XSPC (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

UFO ER0.75%
XSPC ER0.75%

Strategy & risk

UFO tracks S-Network Space Index, while XSPC is an ETF built around a thematic strategy.

UFO beta1.9
XSPC beta—

Fund details

UFO is managed by Procure (launched 04/10/2019) with $558M in assets. XSPC is managed by VegaShares (launched 06/15/2026) with $2.12M in assets.

UFO AUM$558M
XSPC AUM$2.12M
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of UFO or XSPC pays more dividend income?

UFO currently reports a distribution yield, while XSPC has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between UFO and XSPC?

UFO (Procure Space ETF) tracks S-Network Space Index, while XSPC (VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF) is an ETF built around a thematic strategy. They are issued by Procure and VegaShares respectively.

Can I hold both UFO and XSPC?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, UFO or XSPC?

UFO and XSPC both charge the same expense ratio of 0.75%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in UFO vs XSPC generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in UFO would generate roughly $2.25 per month ($27.00 annually). XSPC has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, UFO or XSPC?

UFO has outpaced XSPC over the shared window since Jun 2026, posting a -15.63% total return against -16.52%. UFO has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 31.3% against 53.8% for XSPC. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

UFO vs XSPC — at a glance

Generated September 19, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

UFO and XSPC are both equity ETFs focused on space-sector companies, but they differ significantly in scope, maturity, and income approach. The key distinction is that UFO targets a broad basket of space-revenue-generating companies through an established index methodology, whereas XSPC pursues a more specialized thematic strategy.

How they differ

UFO follows a published index (S-Network Space Index) with a defined, replicable methodology, whereas XSPC pursues a thematic strategy with less transparent underlying mechanics. Both carry a 0.75% expense ratio, but UFO's $558M in AUM substantially exceeds XSPC's $2.12M, suggesting UFO has achieved material investor adoption while XSPC remains in early-stage asset gathering. UFO's 1.9 beta signals meaningful sensitivity to market swings, which is typical for concentrated thematic equity exposure.

XSPC: Fits investors drawn to a specialized thematic approach in space technology who are comfortable with minimal trading volume, early-stage fund dynamics, and zero current distributions.

Key risks to know

  • Thematic concentration and definition risk. Both funds target a single industry theme, which concentrates portfolio risk. UFO's index methodology is published; XSPC's underlying holdings and selection criteria are less transparent, creating uncertainty about what "SpaceX & Beyond Earth" actually captures as the fund evolves.
  • Growth-stock volatility and market sensitivity. UFO's 1.9 beta indicates pronounced price swings during market stress, typical of early-stage aerospace and technology businesses. These companies are cyclical and capital-intensive, amplifying downside pressure in bear markets. Thin trading volume could widen bid-ask spreads and increase execution costs for entry and exit.
  • Space-sector regulatory and execution risk. Both funds depend on commercial space companies that face regulatory approval delays, launch failures, supply-chain disruptions, and long development cycles. Government budget cuts or shifts in space policy could impair multiple portfolio companies simultaneously. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

How to read a fund's stats How expense ratios eat returns Correlation between two funds

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener